scholarly journals Awareness and Perceptions of State Hospital Pharmacists on Dispensing Errors – Evidence from Three Hospitals in Sri Lanka

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
R. A. N. Dilsha ◽  
H. M. I. P. Kularathne ◽  
M. T. M. Mujammail ◽  
S. M. M. Irshad ◽  
N. R. Samaranayake
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. N. Dilsha ◽  
H. M. I. P. Kularathne ◽  
M. T. M. Mujammil ◽  
S. M. M. Irshad ◽  
N. R. Samaranayake

Abstract Background Dispensing errors, known to result in significant patient harm, are preventable if their nature is known and recognized. However, there is a scarcity of such data on dispensing errors particularly in resource poor settings, where healthcare is provided free-of-charge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the types, and prevalence of dispensing errors in a selected group of hospitals in Sri Lanka. Methods A prospective, cross sectional, multi-center study on dispensing errors was conducted, in a single tertiary care, and two secondary care hospitals, in a cohort of 420 patients attending medical, surgical, diabetic and pediatric clinics. The patients were selected according to the population size, through consecutive sampling. The prescription audit was conducted in terms of dispensing errors which were categorized as i) content, ii) labelling, iii) documentation, iv) concomitant, and v) other errors based on in-house developed definitions. Results A total of 420 prescriptions (1849 medicines) were analyzed (Hospital-I, 248 prescriptions-1010 medicines; Hospital-II, 84 prescriptions-400 medicines; Hospital-III, 88 prescriptions-439 medicines), and a cumulative total of 16,689 dispensing errors (at least one dispensing error in a prescription) were detected. Labelling errors were the most frequent dispensing error (63.1%; N = 10,523; Mostly missing information on the dispensing label), followed by concomitant prescribing and dispensing errors (20.5%; N = 3425; Missing prescribing information overlooked by the pharmacist), documentation errors (10.6%; N = 1772 Missing identification of pharmacist on dispensing label), clinically significant medication interactions overlooked by pharmacists (0.5%; N = 82), content errors (4.9%; N = 812; Discrepancies between medication dispensed and prescription order), medications dispensed in unsuitable packaging (0.4%; N = 74), and lastly medication dispensed to the wrong patient (0.01%; N = 1). Conclusions Dispensing errors are frequent in Sri Lankan hospitals which operate with limited resources and provide free healthcare to all citizenry. Over one half of the errors were labeling errors with minimal content errors. Awareness on common types of dispensing errors and emphasis on detecting them could improve medication safety in Sri Lankan hospitals.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A.N. Dilsha ◽  
H.M.I.P. Kularathne ◽  
M.T.M. Mujammil ◽  
S.M.M. Irshad ◽  
Nithushi Samaranayake

Abstract Background Dispensing errors may result in patient harm. Dispensing errors are preventable if we knew its nature, but only very little information is available on these errors that occur in limited resourced settings where healthcare is provided free of charge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the types and prevalence of dispensing errors in selected hospitals in Sri Lanka. Methods A prospective, cross sectional and multi-centered study (in one tertiary care and two secondary care hospitals) was conducted among 420 patients attending medical, surgical, diabetes and pediatric clinics of study hospitals, proportioned according to population size, and selected through a systematic random sampling. A prescription audit was conducted. Dispensing errors were categorized as content, labelling, documentation, concomitant, and other errors based on definitions developed in-house. The total number of dispensing errors identified was used as the denominator for calculating percentages. Results A total of 420 prescriptions (1849 medicines) were analyzed (Hospital-01, 248 prescriptions with 1010 medicines; Hospital-02, 84 prescriptions with 400 medicines; Hospital-03, 88 prescriptions with 439 medicines), where 16,689 dispensing errors were detected. However, most frequent were labelling errors (63.1%). There were 4.9% content errors, 21% concomitant errors, 10.6% documentation errors, and 0.4% of other errors. No omissions or deteriorated medicines were detected. Conclusions Dispensing errors happen in Sri Lankan hospitals that operate with limited resources and provide free healthcare to citizens. However, most were labeling errors with little chance of immediate harm. Content errors were minimal. More emphasis on error-proofing the dispensing process could improve medication safety in these hospitals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1560587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma A. Adams ◽  
Elisabeth Darj ◽  
Kumudu Wijewardene ◽  
Jennifer J. Infanti

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 114-115
Author(s):  
Kavinga Gunawardane ◽  
Noel Somasundaram ◽  
Neil Thalagala ◽  
Pubudu Chulasiri ◽  
Sudath Fernando

Crisis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudath Samaraweera ◽  
Athula Sumathipala ◽  
Sisira Siribaddana ◽  
S. Sivayogan ◽  
Dinesh Bhugra

Background: Suicidal ideation can often lead to suicide attempts and completed suicide. Studies have shown that Sri Lanka has one of the highest rates of suicide in the world but so far no studies have looked at prevalence of suicidal ideation in a general population in Sri Lanka. Aims: We wanted to determine the prevalence of suicidal ideation by randomly selecting six Divisional Secretariats (Dss) out of 17 in one district. This district is known to have higher than national average rates of suicide. Methods: 808 participants were interviewed using Sinhala versions of GHQ-30 and Beck’s Scale for Suicidal Ideation. Of these, 387 (48%) were males, and 421 (52%) were female. Results: On Beck’s Scale for Suicidal Ideation, 29 individuals (4%) had active suicidal ideation and 23 (3%) had passive suicidal ideation. The active suicidal ideators were young, physically ill and had higher levels of helplessness and hopelessness. Conclusions: The prevalence of suicidal ideation in Sri Lanka is lower than reported from the West and yet suicide rates are higher. Further work must explore cultural and religious factors.


Crisis ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murad M. Khan

Summary: The Indian subcontinent comprises eight countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Bhutan, and the Maldives) and a collective population of more than 1.3 billion people. 10% of the world's suicides (more than 100,000 people) take place in just three of these countries, viz. India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. There is very little information on suicides from the other four countries. Some differences from suicides in Western countries include the high use of organophosphate insecticides, larger numbers of married women, fewer elderly subjects, and interpersonal relationship problems and life events as important causative factors. There is need for more and better information regarding suicide in the countries of the Indian subcontinent. In particular, studies must address culture-specific risk factors associated with suicide in these countries. The prevention of this important public health problem in an area of the world with myriad socio-economic problems, meager resources, and stigmatization of mental illness poses a formidable challenge to mental health professionals, policy makers, and governments of these countries.


1998 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 771-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Rogers ◽  
Jonathan Spencer ◽  
Jayadeva Uyangoda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document