scholarly journals Production and characterization of niobium carbide coatings produced on tool steels by thermoreactive deposition/diffusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.E Castillejo ◽  
D.M Marulanda ◽  
J.J Olaya
Author(s):  
Andrej K. Kuleshov ◽  
Vladimir V. Uglov ◽  
V. M. Anishchik ◽  
V. A. Firago ◽  
D. P. Rusalski ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Heaney ◽  
Joseph T. Keeley ◽  
Albert H. Bremser ◽  
Mohamed S. El-Genk ◽  
Mark D. Hoover

Vacuum ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Soltani ◽  
Mahmoud Heydarzadeh Sohi ◽  
Mohammad Ansari ◽  
Ahmadreza Haghighi ◽  
Hamid M. Ghasemi ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 691-692
Author(s):  
K.C. Hsieh ◽  
E.A. Kenik

There has been increasing interest from industry to characterize the different precipitate distributions in ferrous materials to account for different mechanical properties that are observed. For this study, two different heat treatments were chosen for the experimental S5 tool steel, modified to have 0.24 wt% C. Alloy S5-1 received 1 hour of austenitizing at 970°C, was quenched at rate of 140°C/s and tempered for 1 hour at 200°C. Alloy S5-2 received 40 minutes of austenitizing at 940°C, was quenched at rate of 16°C/s and tempered for 1 hour at 200 °C. In this relatively low hardenability steel, both S5-1 and S5-2 show mixed microstructures of tempered martensite and bainite (Fig. 1, 2). Not surprisingly, the slower cooling rate for S5-2 created an alloy with inferior microstructure and mechanical properties. Even though these differences in precipitate distributions, could not directly account for differences in mechanical properties, it is of interest to study how the different heat treatments affected the precipitate distributions in S5-1 and S5-2.


1984 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Dua ◽  
V.C. George ◽  
R.P. Agarwala ◽  
R. Krishnan

2014 ◽  
Vol 802 ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Olimpio de Araújo Filho ◽  
Rodrigo Tecchio Antonello ◽  
Cezar Henrique Gonzalez ◽  
Severino Leopoldino Urtiga Filho ◽  
Francisco Ambrozio Filho

High speed steels processed by Powder Metallurgy (PM) techniques present better mechanical properties when compared with similar steels obtained by the conventional process of cast to ingot and hot working. PM techniques produce improved microstructures with smaller and better distribution of carbides. Liquid phase sintering high speed steel seems to be a cheaper processing route in the manufacturing of tool steels if compared to the well-known and expansive hot isostatic pressing high speed steels. The introduction of niobium as alloying element began with the object of replacing elements like vanadium (V) and tungsten (W). Phase liquid sintering consists in a manufacturing technique to process high speed steels by powder metallurgy. The aim of this work of research is to process and obtain AISI M2 and M3:2 with and without the addition of niobium carbide by high energy milling, cold uniaxial compaction and vacuum sintering in the presence of a liquid phase. The powders of the AISI M2 and M3:2 were processed by high energy milling adding a small quantity of niobium carbide (6% in mass), then the powders were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron Microscopy (SEM) plus energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS) in order to evaluate the milling process. The powders of the AISI M2 and M3:2 with the addition of niobium carbide (NbC) were uniaxially cold compacted and then submitted to vacuum sintering. The sintered samples had their microstructure, porosity and carbide distribution observed and evaluated by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and the mechanical property of hardness was investigated by means of Vickers hardness tests. At least five samples of each steel were investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document