In Australia, the period during grain filling for wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) is often associated with
increasing ambient temperatures and diminishing soil moisture conditions. This
can affect grain size and grain protein concentration. In this study, grain
filling and nitrogen accumulation were investigated by sampling every 7 days
during grain filling for 4 cultivars: Rosella, Hartog, Halberd, and Eradu. The
plants were grown in trials with and without irrigation in 1991 and 1992,
which were seasons with divergent temperatures and rainfall during this
period. A4-term logistic function, using both days after anthesis (DAA) and
growing degree days (GDD), was fitted to data to estimate maximum rate and
duration of grain filling. The logistic model proved to be, in most cases, an
accurate method to determine the rate and duration of grain filling and
nitrogen accumulation. Probably because of differences in availability of soil
moisture, the use of GDD did not improve on the estimates obtained from using
DAAas the independent variable.
In 1991, a relatively dry year, non-irrigated plants showed signs of wilting.
In that year, grain nitrogen contents on a per grain basis were similar in
both the irrigated and non-irrigated (dryland) environments, but grain weights
were much higher from the irrigated environment. The maximum rate and duration
of grain filling were lower in the dryland environment. In contrast, whereas
the duration of nitrogen accumulation was similarly shorter in the dryland
environment, the maximum rate of accumulation was substantially higher. In
1992, a cooler and wetter year, differences between irrigated and
non-irrigated environments were smaller, but the trends for rate and duration
were similar. We concluded that, under stress conditions, higher rates of
accumulation of grain nitrogen and lower rates of accumulation of
carbohydrate, rather than differences in duration of accumulation, were
primarily responsible for increased grain nitrogen concentrations.
In general, cultivars used in this study were ranked similarly for rate and
duration of grain filling across environments, with the exception of Hartog,
which had a significantly lower maximum rate in the dryland treatment in 1991.
This suggests that Hartog may be more sensitive to drier conditions than the
other cultivars. In almost all environments, Eradu had a higher maximum rate
of accumulation of grain nitrogen than other cultivars; however, the duration
was reduced, so that in the mature grain, grain nitrogen concentration was not
significantly different.