scholarly journals De Novo CD5-Positive Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Coexpressing MYC and BCL6: Towards a Proper Subset of Double-Hit, Triple-Hit and, Maybe, Quadruple-Hit B-Cell Lymphomas?

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Roncati
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 83-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazila Asmar ◽  
Christoffer Hother ◽  
Gorjan Kulosman ◽  
Marianne B. Treppendahl ◽  
Helene Myrtue Nielsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Disruption of miR34a, -b, and -c has been implicated in lymphomagenesis, and in CLL it has been suggested that miR34a expression is a surrogate marker for TP53 disruption associated with a poor prognosis. P53 is a transcription factor for the miR34s, and overexpression of miR34s in p53 deficient cells can reinstate p53 functions (Chang et al, Mol Cell 26, 2007, He et al, Nature 447, 2007). However, in cellular senescence miR34a may be activated independently of p53 (Christoffersen et al, Cell Death Differ17, 2010). A recent multicenter study shows that in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), TP53 disruption is still a negative prognostic factor for survival after the implementation of Rituximab (Xu-Monette et al, Blood 19, 2012). Information on the role of the miR34s in normal CD19+ B-cells (PBL-B), activated B-cells, and de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is limited. Aims Given that MIR34A and MIR34B/C locate to regions of allelic loss in DLBCL (1p36.23 and 11q23.1, respectively), and the importance of the miR34 targets in DLBCL pathogenesis, we investigated a large panel of newly diagnosed cases of DLBCLs for MIR34A and MIR34B/C promoter methylation, TP53 mutational status, clinical presentation patterns, and outcome. Methods MIR34A/B/C promotor methylation was performed by MsMCA and bisulfite sequencing. Histone modifcations at the MIR34A/B/C promotor was examined by ChIP RT-qPCR. Expression of miR34s was performed using miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT-qPCR. The coding sequences and splice sites of exons 5-9 of the TP53gene were scanned for mutations by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Differences in clinical characteristics using the one-way Anova, the Pearson chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. For assessment of independent predictors of survival a multivariate Cox regression hazard model with backward stepwise (likelihood ratio) entry was applied. Effects not meeting a p-value < 0.05 were removed from the model. Results We show that only miR34a-5p is expressed in PBL-B, and significantly induced in activated B-cells (P=0.017) and reactive lymph nodes (P<0.001). No significant induction of the other miR34s is observed. In PBL-B, the MIR34A and MIR34B/C promoters are unmethylated, but the latter show enrichment for the H3K4me3/H3K27me3 silencing mark. One hundred and twenty two (81%) of 150 de novo DLBCLs carried one or more of the following alterations: TP53 mutations: 24 (16%), MIR34A methylation: 42 (28%), and MIR34B/C methylation: 116 (77%). Nine cases (6%) carried combined TP53 mutation and methylation of MIR34A. MIR34B/C methylation, and either mutation of TP53 or methylation of MIR34A (+/- MIR34B/C methylation) did not influence survival. However, the 9 patients with concomitant mutation of TP53 and MIR34A methylation had a median survival of only 9.4 months (P<0.0001), and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TP53/MIR34A “double-hit” is an independent negative prognostic factor for survival (P=0.0002). Interestingly, none of the Rituximab treated patients with TP53 mutation only had died after >3 years, while all but one of those Rituximab treated patients with concommitant disruption of TP53 and MIR34A died within the first 13 months from diagnosis. In 2 DLBCL-cell lines with concomitant TP53 mutation and methylation of MIR34A,miR34a-5p was upregulated by 5-aza-2’deoxycytidine. Conclusion Studies of many different cancer cell types including the present study suggest that miR34s for the larger part are downregulated by promoter hypermethylation, and we show that miR34a-5p can be upregulated by a hypomethylating agent in DLBCL cells with a methylated MIR34A promoter in cells with and without TP53 mutations. Thus we believe, we have identified a novel rare, aggressive, but treatable “double-hit” DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Swerdlow

Abstract Identification of large B-cell lymphomas that are “extra-aggressive” and may require therapy other than that used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS), is of great interest. Large B-cell lymphomas with MYC plus BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, so-called ‘double hit’ (DHL) or ‘triple hit’ (THL) lymphomas, are one such group of cases often recognized using cytogenetic FISH studies. Whether features such as morphologic classification, BCL2 expression, or type of MYC translocation partner may mitigate the very adverse prognosis of DHL/THL is controversial. Classification of the DHL/THL is also controversial, with most either dividing them up between the DLBCL, NOS and B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma (BCLU) categories or classifying at least the majority as BCLU. The BCLU category itself has many features that overlap those of DHL/THL. Currently, there is growing interest in the use of MYC and other immunohistochemistry either to help screen for DHL/THL or to identify “double-expressor” (DE) large B-cell lymphomas, defined in most studies as having ≥40% MYC+ and ≥50%-70% BCL2+ cells. DE large B-cell lymphomas are generally aggressive, although not as aggressive as DHL/THL, are more common than DHL/THL, and are more likely to have a nongerminal center phenotype. Whether single MYC rearrangements or MYC expression alone is of clinical importance is controversial. The field of the DHL/THL and DE large B-cell lymphomas is becoming more complex, with many issues left to resolve; however, great interest remains in identifying these cases while more is learned about them.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Friedberg

Abstract The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for lymphoma has included a new category of lymphoma, separate from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, termed high-grade B-cell lymphoma with translocations involving myc and bcl-2 or bcl-6. These lymphomas, which occur in <10% of cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been referred to as double-hit lymphomas (or triple-hit lymphomas if all 3 rearrangements are present). It is important to differentiate these lymphomas from the larger group of double-expressor lymphomas, which have increased expression of MYC and BCL-2 and/or BCL-6 by immunohistochemistry, by using variable cutoff percentages to define positivity. Patients with double-hit lymphomas have a poor prognosis when treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy and have increased risk of central nervous system involvement and progression. Double-hit lymphomas may arise as a consequence of the transformation of the underlying indolent lymphoma. There are no published prospective trials in double-hit lymphoma, however retrospective studies strongly suggest that aggressive induction regimens may confer a superior outcome. In this article, I review my approach to the evaluation and treatment of double-hit lymphoma, with an eye toward future clinical trials incorporating rational targeted agents into the therapeutic armamentarium.


1999 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Toshiyuki Ohno ◽  
Kouji Oka ◽  
Masanori Taniguchi ◽  
Motohiro Ito ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (20) ◽  
pp. 33487-33500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Tsuyama ◽  
Daisuke Ennishi ◽  
Masahiro Yokoyama ◽  
Satoko Baba ◽  
Reimi Asaka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Rasha Haggag ◽  
Naglaa A. Mostafa ◽  
Marwa Nabil ◽  
Hala A. Shokralla ◽  
Neveen F. H. Sidhom

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.Patients and methods: This retrospective study was collected data from 64 de novo DLBCL patients, who received standardized R-CHOP therapy at two oncology centers. CXCR4 and mTOR expressions were assessed by immunohistochemistry.Results: Out of the 64 DLBCL patients, 40 patients were positive for CXCR4 (62.5%) and 35 patients for mTOR (54.7%) expressions. CXCR4 expression was positively correlated with mTOR expression (r = 0.7; p < .001). While mTOR expression was significantly associated with high lactate dehydrogenase level (p = .03) and number of extranodal sites one or more (p =.02), CXCR4 expression was significantly associated with high IPI score (p < .001) and ECOG PS (p = .005). Furthermore, theexpression levels of mTOR and CXCR4 were significantly associated with older ages and poor response to treatment (p = .04, <.001 and .04, .03, respectively). After a median Follow up of 22 months, mean ± SD overall survival (OS) was 65.391 ± 4.705. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients positive for mTOR and CXCR4 expression had shorter DFS (p = .01 & .02) and OS (p = .02 & .04). Multivariate analysis showed that CXCR4 and mTOR positivity is an independent prognostic factor for significantly poorer DFS (p = .03, and .02 respectively) but not for OS (p = .09 and .08 respectively) in the DLBCL pateints.Conclusion: Our results indicate that the expression of CXCR4 and mTOR may be poor prognostic biomarkers in DLBCL.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1742-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Greer ◽  
W R Macon ◽  
R E Lamar ◽  
S N Wolff ◽  
R S Stein ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Clinicopathologic features of 44 patients with well-documented T-cell-rich B-cell lymphomas (TCRBCLs) were reviewed to determine if there were distinguishing clinical characteristics and to evaluate the responsiveness to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients had de novo TCRBCL, while three patients had a prior diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Seventeen TCRBCLs were identified from a retrospective analysis of 176 lymphomas diagnosed before 1988 as peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCLs). The initial pathologic diagnosis was incorrect in 36 of 44 cases (82%), usually due to the absence of adequate immunophenotypic and/or genotypic studies at the initial study. RESULTS The median age of patients was 53 years (range, 17 to 92), and the male-to-female ratio was 1.4:1. B symptoms were present in 22 of 41 patients (54%); splenomegaly was detected in 11 patients (25%). Clinical stage at diagnosis was as follows: I (n = 8), II (n = 6), III (n = 15), IV (n = 14), and unstaged (n = 1). Although therapy was heterogeneous, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years for patients with de novo TCRBCL were 29% and 46%, respectively. A complete response (CR) to combination chemotherapy for intermediate-grade lymphomas was observed in 16 of 26 patients (62%); 11 of these patients (42%) had a continuous CR, compared with one of 14 patients (7%) who received radiation therapy or therapy for low-grade lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease (HD) (P < .05). However, there was no difference in OS between patients who received chemotherapy for intermediate-grade lymphoma versus other therapies (49% v 48%) due to a high response rate to salvage therapies, including seven patients without disease after marrow transplantation. CONCLUSION TCRBCLs are difficult to recognize without immunoperoxidase studies. Patients with TCRBCL have clinical features similar to patients with other large B-cell lymphomas, except they may have more splenomegaly and advanced-stage disease; they should receive combination chemotherapy directed at large-cell lymphomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document