scholarly journals Ticagrelor: A safe option as part of triple therapy?

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Umar Farooq
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Ischemic Events

Patients with atrial fibrillation who have concurrent coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention are subsequently prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation resulting in triple therapy (TT). Ticagrelor, a reversibly binding P2Y12 antiplatelet agent, has shown superiority to clopidogrel in prevention of ischemic events and death, but is also associated with a small increase in the incidence of intracranial bleeding. This bleeding risk may be enhanced in the setting of TT. The objective of this report is to describe a case of a 70-year-old male prescribed TT with ticagrelor and to review the current literature on the safety of ticagrelor as a part of TT.

scholarly journals The usefulness of total thrombus-formation analysis system for predicting high bleeding risk in coronary artery disease patients taking anticoagulants who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Nakanishi ◽  
K Kaikita ◽  
T Mitsuse ◽  
K Tsujita
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Although anticoagulants are widely used for prevention of cerebral infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), venous thrombosis, and valvular disease, it is possible that anticoagulants increase bleeding events in daily medical practices. Recently, we reported that the total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS) was useful for evaluating bleeding risk in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Aim We examined whether T-TAS was practical for predicting bleeding risk in CAD patients taking anticoagulants who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This study was the retrospective analysis of the 500 consecutive CAD patients who underwent PCI. Blood samples obtained on the day of PCI were used in T-TAS to compute the thrombus formation area under the curve (AUC) (AR10-AUC30, AUC for AR chip). We divided the total number of study patients into two groups according to the presence of anticoagulants; 53 CAD patients with triple therapy (TT) and 447 CAD patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We compared clinical characteristics and prognosis between the two groups. The primary endpoint was 1-year bleeding events that were defined by ISTH bleeding criteria. We excluded the CAD patients who underwent emergency PCI, and who were treated for hemodialysis. Results All patients took aspirin and clopidogrel, or aspirin and prasugrel at baseline. Compared to the patients with DAPT, the patients with TT had atrial fibrillation and history of stroke. The AR10-AUC30 levels were significantly lower in the patients with TT than the patients with DAPT (median [interquartile range] 1402.6 [1095.1–1609.8] vs. 1679.8 [1526.4–1783.3], p<0.001). Thirty-five patients (7%) had bleeding events during follow-up [11 cases (20.8%) in the patients with TT, 24 cases (5.4%) in the patients with DAPT]. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed a worse 1-year bleeding event-free survival rate in the patients with TT compared with the patients with DAPT (p<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that AR10-AUC30 levels significantly predicted bleeding events (AUC 0.653, 95% CI 0.555–0.751; p=0.003) and the cut-off point was 1586.4 by Youden index in the present study. In multivariate Cox hazards analysis, low AR10-AUC30 level (≤1586.4) (hazard ratio 2.99; 95% CI 1.46–6.11; p=0.003) and taking warfarin (hazard ratio 3.02; 95% CI 1.24–7.34; p=0.015) were significant predictors for 1-year bleeding events. Conclusions The present findings suggested that the AR10-AUC30 level determined by T-TAS could be a useful marker for predicting high bleeding risk in CAD patients taking anticoagulants who underwent PCI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Where Are We Now?

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 884-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan G. D’Angelo ◽  
Thaddeus McGiness ◽  
Laura H. Waite
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Objective: To synthesize the literature and provide guidance to practitioners regarding double therapy (DT) and triple therapy (TT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data Sources: PubMed and MEDLINE (January 2000 to February 2018) were searched using the following terms: atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, anticoagulation, dual-antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel, aspirin, ticagrelor, prasugrel, and triple therapy. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The results included randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. Each study was reported based on study design, population, intervention, comparator, and key cardiovascular (CV) and bleeding outcomes. Data Synthesis: A total of 15 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies evaluating DT and TT utilized clopidogrel and warfarin as components of the regimen, although there are emerging data with newer agents. Evidence purporting DT regimens to be equally effective in preventing CV events and improved safety profiles compared with TT regimens included populations with relatively low risk for recurrent CV events, and many of these studies were observational in nature. Overall, current evidence as well as American and European guidelines support the use of TT in patients with AF who require PCI for the least possible amount of time, depending on patient-specific factors involving bleeding and thrombosis. Conclusions: In the majority of patients with AF who require PCI, TT should be used for the shortest period of time possible. DT regimens may be used in patients requiring PCI who have low risk for thrombosis and/or high bleeding risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document