scholarly journals Expression of E-cadherin, Ki-67, and p53 in urinary bladder cancer in relation to progression, survival, and recurrence

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Ziaran ◽  
Stefan Harsanyi ◽  
Katarina Bevizova ◽  
Zuzana Varchulova Novakova ◽  
Branislav Trebaticky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Urinary Bladder ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Urinary Bladder Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
E Cadherin

Although the incidence varies with age and gender, urothelial bladder cancer is a relatively frequently occurring malignancy with variable clinical behavior that often has high recurrence rates. In this study, we analyzed the tumor tissues of 224 patients with pTa, pT1, and pT2 urinary bladder cancer. We performed a histomorphologic analysis and immunohistochemistry for p53, Ki-67, and E-cadherin, which were selected as markers of the malignant process. For pTa and pT1, univariate analyses of cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test and Cox regression. Multivariate analysis was performed by a Cox regression analysis. Ki-67 (P<0.001) was significantly associated with CSS, but the highest association was shown for E-cadherin (P<0.001). For pT1 and pTa, the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed significantly worse PFS for patients with higher levels of Ki-67 (P<0.001) and lower levels of E-cadherin (P<0.001). Based on these obtained results, it can be clearly stated that Ki-67 and E-cadherin expression levels are associated with CSS, PFS and RFS. The clinical utility of these markers is valuable for pTa and pT1 urinary bladder cancer and should be further verified with prospective multi-center trials.

Survival Outcomes for Induction vs Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Maxillary Sinus

2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Kuo ◽  
Sina J. Torabi ◽  
Dennis Kraus ◽  
Benjamin L. Judson
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Objective In advanced maxillary sinus cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, poor local control rates and the potential for organ preservation have prompted interest in the use of systemic therapy. Our objective was to present outcomes for induction compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in the maxillary sinus. Study Design Secondary database analysis. Setting National Cancer Database (NCDB). Subjects and Methods In total, 218 cases of squamous cell maxillary sinus cancer treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the NCDB and stratified into induction chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy cohorts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were compared by log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression was performed to evaluate overall survival when adjusting for other prognostic factors. Propensity score matching was also used for further comparison. Results Twenty-three patients received induction chemotherapy (10.6%) and 195 adjuvant chemotherapy (89.4%). The log-rank test comparing induction to adjuvant chemotherapy was not significant ( P = .076). In multivariate Cox regression when adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidity, grade, insurance, and T/N stage, there was a significant mortality hazard ratio of 2.305 for adjuvant relative to induction chemotherapy (confidence interval, 1.076-4.937; P = .032). Conclusion Induction chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in comparison to adjuvant chemotherapy in a relatively small cohort of patients (in whom treatment choice cannot be characterized), suggesting that this question warrants further investigation in a controlled clinical trial before any recommendations are made.

Prognostic value of immunohistochemical phenotypes (IP) of 141 operable breast cancer patients (pts) included in phase III trials of adjuvant therapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21040-21040
Author(s):  
R. Trujillo ◽  
E. Gallego ◽  
A. Márquez ◽  
N. Ribelles ◽  
J. Trigo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Her 2

21040 Background: Gene expression arrays and IP studies classified breast cancer in three distinct subtypes: basal, HER2/neu and luminal that are associated with different clinical outcomes. Methods: In 141 pts with operable breast cancer, included in phase III trials of adjuvant therapy in our center, immunohistochemical staining was performed on 3μm sections of paraffin blocks, containing tissue-arrays of tumour tissue.A basal phenotype (BP) was defined by negative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and positive cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 or EGFR immunoreactivity. HER2/neu phenotype as positive c-erb B2 by HercepTest™ and luminal phenotype (LP) by positive ER, PR and CK 7/8 and negative HER-2. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences between survivals were estimated using the log rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate any independent prognostic effect of the variables on disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Complete clinical follow-up information was available for 141 pts. The median follow-up period was 52 months (range 1–103 months). During this period, 13.8% pts died from breast cancer and 27.7% pts relapsed. At the time of the primary diagnosis 10.4% of the pts had lymph node negative disease and 89.6% had positive lymph nodes. 50.8% pts received taxane chemotherapy, 7.7% Trastuzumab, 62.3% radiotherapy and 61% pts received hormonotherapy. Positivity for LP was 65.2%, BP 9.9% and Her-2 phenotype 8.5%. 16.3% didn't fit for any of the three subtypes. Median DFS for BP: 24 moths, for LP and Her-2 phenotypes median DFS was not reached. 5 years DFS were; BP: 19%, LP: 63% and Her-2: 56%. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that the presence of a detectable BP was highly significantly associated with a worse DFS compared with the presence of a LP, log rank test (p= 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses estimated that the prognostic effect of BP in relation to DFS was independent of lymph node, stage and tumor size, HR: 0.12 95% CI (0.05–0.2). Conclusions: We found that expression of BP was associated with poor prognostic in the context of randomized phase III trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting objective responses to chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18084-e18084
Author(s):  
Hongbing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Protective Factor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Serum Cea ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e18084 Background: Previous studies indicated the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) could predict the therapeutic objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS) of patients with cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role it could play in evaluating therapeutic responses and OS in patients with NSCLC requires further elucidation. Herein, we investigated the potential role of CEA in predicting OR and OS in patients with NSCLC. Methods: 689 patients with NSCLC were enrolled between January 2000 and August 2011. The correlations between the CEA levels and OR or OS were examined via statistical analyses including the chi-squared test, logistical regression, paired-samples t-test, receiver operator characteristic curve, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test and Cox regression model. Results: The calculated cut-off for predicting an OR to chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC was a reduction of 5.28% in serum CEA. This value demonstrated a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 62.4%. Serum CEA levels significantly decreased after two cycles of chemotherapy in NSCLC patients (t = 2.196, P = 0.031). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated no significant correlation between baseline CEA and OS (log rank test =0.079). However, according to the Cox regression analysis the number of distant metastatic organs (=1 and ≥2) was the independent risk factor of the OS (P = 0.026; P =0.003), and the cycle numbers of chemotherapy was the protective factor for OS in patients with NSCLC (P=0.011).More importantly, baseline serum CEA was significantly associated with lung adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous subtypes (P = 0.014; P = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: Our study shows that baseline serum CEA was significantly associated with lung adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous subtypes. While the baseline level of serum CEA was not a prognostic factor, the post-treatment reduction of serum CEA level can predict the OR in patients with NSCLC,. The number of chemotherapy cycles was the independent protective factor, while the numbers of distant metastatic organs was the independent risk factor for NSCLC patients’ OS.

scholarly journals The Relation Between Histological, Tumor-Biological and Clinical Parameters in Deep and Superficial Leiomyosarcoma and Leiomyoma

Sarcoma ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Pijpe ◽  
Gerben H. Torn Broers ◽  
Boudewijn E.Ch. Plaat ◽  
M. Hundeiker ◽  
F. Otto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Potential ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Biological Behaviour ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Proliferation Markers ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Size Grade ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

Purpose: Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) of deep and superficial tissues were examined to identify prognostic markers explaining their different biological behaviour and to define differences between cutaneous and subcutaneous LMS. LMS and leiomyomas (LM) of the skin were compared to and consistent differences that could aid in the (sometimes difficult) diagnosis.Patients: Material was obtained from 27 patients with a deep LMS, 14 with a superficial LMS, and 21 with a LM.Methods: Proliferation markers (mitotic and Ki-67 indices), DNA ploidy, size, grade, and the amount of apoptosis were studied. Statistical analysis was performed and survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.Results: Superficial LMS were smaller than deep LMS (p < 0.05), and the overall survival of patients with a superficial LMS was better than with a deep LMS (p < 0.05).Within the group of superficial LMS only entirely subcutaneous, and not cutaneous tumors metastasized.No differences were found in the other examined parameters. Proliferation and apoptotic indices were significantly higher in superficial LMS compared to superficial LM.Discussion: The difference in clinical outcome between patients with a superficial and deep LMS, seems to be related to site and size.The metastatic potential of subcutaneous LMS, however, seems to be related to location alone and not to size.The amount of apoptosis and proliferation can be used as additional criteria in the differentiation between superficial LMS and LM.

scholarly journals Comparison of Efficacy Between Triamcinolone Acetonide and Triamcinolone Hexacetonide for Intraarticular Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre De Ranieri ◽  
Angela Chun ◽  
Lutfiyya Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Regression Models ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Triamcinolone Hexacetonide ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Time To Relapse ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

Abstract Background There are many FDA-approved corticosteroid preparations available for intra-articular injection, however triamcinolone hexacetonide is not one of them. It was the intraarticular drug of choice among pediatric rheumatologists up until approximately a decade ago, when production of this medication ceased. It can be obtained in the United States and Canada via importation from Europe, but it is not FDA-approved at this time. We wish to compare the duration of remission of intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) with that of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) and demonstrate its safety in this population. Methods This retrospective chart review included 39 patients with JIA who received intraarticular corticosteroid injections (IACIs) from September 2018 to September 2019. These patients were reviewed and their life-time injections with either TH (41 joints) or TA (124 joints) was noted through May 30, 2021. Patients with concomitant systemic therapy initiation were excluded. The primary outcome was time to relapse. Relapse was defined by the presence of arthritis on physical examination by an attending rheumatologist. Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test were constructed to compare the probability of time to relapse between IACI injections. Additionally, mixed effects cox regression models were constructed to account for multiple injections per participant. Results Kaplan-Meier estimator of median relapse time in months was higher for TH. Based on the log-rank test, TA joints had a higher probability of experiencing a relapse during the study time (p-value < 0.001). The hazard of time to relapse was reduced when comparing TH to TA in both unadjusted and adjusted mixed effects cox regression models (unadjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.184 (0.089, 0.381); adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.189 (0.092, 0.386)). Conclusions TH has longer duration of action than TA and is associated with less systemic side effects. It should be considered the drug of choice for intraarticular corticosteroid injections in children with JIA.

scholarly journals Histopathological and Genomic Grading Provide Complementary Prognostic Information in Breast Cancer: A Study on Publicly Available Datasets

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilotpal Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Significant Prognostic Indicator

The genomic grade (GG) for breast cancer is thought to be the genomic counterpart of histopathological grade (HG). The motivation behind this study was to see whether HG retains its prognostic impact even when adjusted for GG, or whether it can be replaced by the latter. Four publicly available gene expression datasets were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test, and Cox regression were used to study recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). HG remained a significant prognostic indicator in low GG tumors (P = 0.003 for DMFS, P< 0.001 for RFS) but not in high GG tumors. HG grade 2 tumors differed significantly from HG grade 1 tumors, underlining the prognostic role of intermediate HG tumors. Additionally, GG could stratify HG 1 as well as HG 2 tumors into distinct prognostic groups. HG and GG add independent prognostic information to each other. However, the prognostic effects of both HG and GG are time varying, with the hazard ratios of high HG and GG tumors being markedly attenuated over time.

scholarly journals A comparison of the prognostic significance of changes in NT-proBNP levels in HFrEF and HFpEF.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishant Sahni ◽  
Umesh Sharma ◽  
Rashi Arora
Keyword(s):  
Regression Models ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Regional Health Care ◽  
Comorbidity Scores ◽  
Blood Pressures

Background: Rising NT-proBNP are associated with reduced survival patients with HFrEF. However, it remains to be conclusively and formally demonstrated that the temporal trend in NT-proBNP level carries prognostic significance in HFpEF. Objective: To determine whether there is an association between rising NT-proBNP levels and 6-month survival in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF. Methods: We examined a cohort of 5203 patients to 5 hospitals in a regional health care system — who had at least one admission to the hospital with diagnoses of heart failure over a 3-year period. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for patients with downtrending (>25% net decrease), stable or uptrending (>25% net increase) NT-proBNP levels in HF, HFpEF and HFrEF patients. The log-rank test was used to test for differences in 6-month survival amongst the groups. Multivariate extended Cox regression models were constructed for 6-month survival with NT-proBNP as a time-varying covariate. Age, albumin, sex, race, serum creatinine, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and Charlson comorbidity scores at baseline were used as covariates in the model. Separate analyses were done for HFpEF and HFrEF patients. Results: HFpEF and HFrEF patients with up-trending levels had significantly lower 6-month survival rates than patients with downtrending or stable NT-proBNP levels. A doubling of the NT-proBNP level in patients was significantly associated with reduced 6-month survival in patients with in both subgroups of HF, HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF-HR: 1.53(1.49-2.57), HFrEF HR: 1.45(1.43-1.48) after adjusting for covariates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document