Sex Differences in Emotional Reactivity to Daily Life Stress in Psychosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inez Myin-Germeys ◽  
L. Krabbendam ◽  
P. A. E. G. Delespaul ◽  
J. van Os
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S46-S46
Author(s):  
I. Myin-Germeys ◽  
G. Merge

BackgroundA recent study did not find clear-cut sex differences in psychotic symptoms. Studies investigating altered stress reactivity more consistently report differences between the sexes, although the results are contradicting in suggesting either men or women to be more stress-sensitive. We assessed self-reported experiences in the context of real-life to more fully understand the nature of sex differences in psychosis.MethodsWe employed the Experience Sampling Method, a structured diary technique, to investigate in real-life:– symptoms;– behavior in context;– underlying mechanisms in 283 healthy controls, 268 subjects at risk for psychosis and 232 patients with psychotic disorder.ResultsMultilevel regression analyses revealed no differences in symptom expression between the sexes. Similarly, men and women did not differ in their level of social interaction and overall activity. However, men at increased risk of psychosis were more often alone and were less involved in goal-directed activities compared to women. Finally, women reported more emotional reactivity to daily life stress then men but women also reported more positive affect when pleasant events had happened.DiscussionThe data thus suggest only minor differences between men and women in psychotic symptoms and actual behavior. However, whenever differences were apparent, they consistently pointed towards more severe symptoms and more deficiencies in men compared to women. In contrast, increased environmental reactivity in women (to both negative and positive environments) in addition to more social contacts may constitute a protective factor for the development of more severe psychopathology.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. MYIN-GERMEYS ◽  
L. KRABBENDAM ◽  
P. A. E. G. DELESPAUL ◽  
J. VAN OS

Background. Life events (LE) have consistently been found to influence course and outcome of psychotic disorders. However, the mechanism through which they operate is not known. The present study investigated whether LE have their effect by impacting on the emotional sensitivity for daily hassles.Method. Patients with clinically remitted psychotic illness (N=42) were studied with the Experience Sampling Method (a structured diary technique assessing current context and mood in daily life) to assess: (1) appraised subjective stress related to daily events and activities; and (2) emotional reactivity conceptualized as changes in both negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA). LE were assessed with the Brown & Harris Life Event and Difficulties Schedule.Results. Multilevel regression analyses showed that previous exposure to LE influenced the appraised stressfulness of neither daily events nor the activities in which the subjects were involved. However, a history of LE did modify the emotional reaction to daily life stress, both in models predicting NA and in models predicting PA.Conclusions. By their cumulative effect on emotional reactivity to daily activities and events, LE may render individuals more vulnerable to the onset or persistence of psychotic experiences.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde M. Husky ◽  
Carolyn M. Mazure ◽  
Paul K. Maciejewski ◽  
Joel D. Swendsen

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inez Myin-Germeys ◽  
Jim van Os ◽  
Joseph E. Schwartz ◽  
Arthur A. Stone ◽  
Philippe A. Delespaul

2003 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Myin-Germeys ◽  
F. Peeters ◽  
R. Havermans ◽  
N. A. Nicolson ◽  
M. W. DeVries ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e0194118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalia J. M. van Knippenberg ◽  
Marjolein E. de Vugt ◽  
Rudolf W. Ponds ◽  
Frans R. J. Verhey ◽  
Inez Myin-Germeys

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landhing M. Moran ◽  
William J. Kowalczyk ◽  
Karran A. Phillips ◽  
Massoud Vahabzadeh ◽  
Jia-Ling Lin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S20-S21
Author(s):  
A. Castro-Zavala ◽  
A. Martín-Sánchez ◽  
L. Montalvo-Martínez ◽  
A. Camacho-Morales ◽  
O. Valverde

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document