scholarly journals The effect of incomplete crown ferrules on fracture resistance and failure modes of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with quartz fiber post, composite core, and crowns

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boonrat Sattapan ◽  
Kewalin Thammasitboon ◽  
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon ◽  
Panorjit Muangamphan
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Maxillary Incisors

scholarly journals Influence of masticatory fatigue on the fracture resistance of the pulpless teeth restored with quartz-fiber post–core and crown

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Er-Min Nie ◽  
Xia-Yun Chen ◽  
Chun-Yuan Zhang ◽  
Li-Li Qi ◽  
Ying-He Huang
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Fiber Post

Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneel V Vadavadagi ◽  
Kiran M Dhananjaya ◽  
Rashmi P Yadahalli ◽  
M Lahari ◽  
Shilpa R Shetty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Post

ABSTRACT Introduction Endodontic restoration becomes a challenging task for the clinician because of severe loss of coronal tooth structure owing to trauma, caries, restorative, and endodontic procedures. The restoration of these teeth requires the use of a post and core as individual units or as abutment supports for fixed or removable restorations in a predictable long-term manner. Aim To compare and assess the compressive bond strength of glass, quartz, and carbon fiber posts restored with porcelainfused- to-metal (PFM) crown. Materials and methods A total of 45 upper central incisor teeth having straight root canals, similar anatomically root segments, and fully developed apices were selected. Teeth were divided into three groups of 15 teeth after endodontic treatment. Group I: Teeth inserted with the prefabricated glass fiber post. Group II: Teeth inserted with the quartz fiber post. Group III: Teeth inserted with carbon fiber post. The posts were placed and core was fabricated using composite restoration followed by PFM crown cementation using adhesive resin. Compressive load required to fracture the tooth was measured using a universal loading machine. The difference between the variables was assessed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Results The compressive strength exhibited by carbon fiber posts was highest with a mean of 668.33 ± 26.397, followed by quartz fiber post (635.80 ± 30.390). Least compressive strength was exhibited by glass fiber post (567.53 ± 26.632). An analysis of variance shows statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.005) among the posts used. Conclusion This study concluded that the carbon fiber posts had higher compressive strength than other quartz, glass fiber posts. Clinical significance Endodontic treatment results in loss of a significant part of the tooth structure. Posts restore these teeth and provide retention. How to cite this article Vadavadagi SV, Dhananjaya KM, Yadahalli RP, Lahari M, Shetty SR, Bhavana BL. Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(3):205-208.

scholarly journals Effect of Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Load-cycled Endodontically-treated Premolars Restored with Direct Composite Resin

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Majidinia ◽  
Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri ◽  
Hila Hajizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Namazikhah ◽  
Mohammad Javad Moghaddas
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance and failure mode of premolars restored with composite resin using various prefabricated posts. Methods and Materials Sixty sound maxillary premolars were divided into four equal sized groups. All but the control group received endodontic treatment followed by placement of mesiodistocclusal (MOD) composite restorations (Tetric Ceram) as follows: Group T = no post, Group DT = fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post (DT Light), Group FL = prefabricated metal post (Filpost). The control group (C) had no cavities prepared. After thermal and load cycling, static load was applied at a 30° angle until fracture. Failure modes were categorized as restorable and non-restorable. Data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan tests (α = 0.05). Results The mean values of fracture loads (N) for all groups were: C (880±258); T (691±239); DT (865±269); and FL (388±167). Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were observed for all groups except between groups C and DT. The Chi Square test showed failure modes in groups C and DT were mostly restorable. The most non-restorable fractures were observed in group FT. Conclusion Intact teeth and the teeth restored with composite and quartz fiber posts had a similar fracture resistance and the failure modes were mostly restorable. The lowest fracture resistance and the most nonrestorable failures were observed in conjunction with metal posts. Clinical Significance The results of this in vitro study suggest the use of a quartz fiber post used in conjunction with an MOD composite resin restoration improves fracture resistance in an endodontically treated premolar. Citation Hajizadeh H, Namazikhah MS, Moghaddas MJ, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S. Effect of Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Load-cycled Endodontically-treated Premolars Restored with Direct Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 May; (10)3:010-017.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Resin Fiber Post and Stainless Steel Post: An In Vitro Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 080-084
Author(s):  
Vijay Singh ◽  
Poonam Bogra ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Navneet Kukreja ◽  
Neha Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Compressive Force ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractFracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with post. Aims: This study aims to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin fiber and stainless steel post. Commercially available prefabricated resin fiber post(Dentsply Maillefer Easy Post), prefabricated stainless steel post(Coltene/Whaledent Parapost) were used. Methods and Material: Forty five maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 3 groups: Control Group (Group I) without any post (n = 15), Resin Fiber Post Group (Group II) (n = 15) and Stainless Steel Post Group (Group III) (n = 15). In all Groups except control group, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. All the specimens were subjected to compressive force under a universal testing machine until fracture. Statistical analysis used: The results were analyzed using the variable analysis test (ANOVA). Results: One-way analysis of variance revealed significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (925.2183 N), followed by the resin fiber post group (486.7265 N) and stainless steel post group (423.539N). Conclusions: Teeth restored with resin fiber post showed higher fracture resistance values than prefabricated stainless steel post.

A Simple 2-step Silane Treatment for Improved Bonding Durability of Resin Cement to Quartz Fiber Post

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1287-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Kyung Kim ◽  
Jun Sik Son ◽  
Kyo-Han Kim ◽  
Tae-Yub Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Resin Cement ◽  
Silane Treatment ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Bonding Durability

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments with Different Diameters

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 613-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safoura Ghodsi ◽  
Reza Shabanpour ◽  
Niloufar Mousavi ◽  
Marzieh Alikhasi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Modes Of Failure ◽  
Body Fracture ◽  
Mode Of Failure ◽  
Different Diameters ◽  
Abutment Screw

ABSTRACT Aim The purpose of the current study was to compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with different diameters. Materials and methods Fourteen groups of abutments including prefabricated zirconia, copy-milled zirconia and titanium abutments of an implant system (XiVE, Dentsply) were prepared in different diameters. An increasing vertical load was applied to each specimen until failure occurred. Fracture resistance was measured in each group using the universal testing machine. Moreover, the failure modes were studied and categorized as abutment screw fracture, connection area fracture, abutment body fracture, abutment body distortion, screw distortion and connection area distortion. Groups were statistically compared using univariate and post-hoc tests. The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. Results Fabrication method (p = 0.03) and diameter (p < 0.001) had significant effect on the fracture resistance of abutments. Fracture resistance of abutments with 5.5 mm diameter was higher than other diameters (p < 0.001). The observed modes of failure were dependent on the abutment material as well. All of the prefabricated titanium abutments fractured within the abutment screw. Abutment screw distortion, connection area fracture, and abutment body fracture were the common failure type in other groups. Conclusion Diameter had a significant effect on fracture resistance of implant abutments, as abutments with greater diameters were more resistant to static loads. Copy-milled abutments showed lower fracture resistance as compared to other experimental groups. Clinical significance Although zirconia abutments have received great popularity among clinicians and even patients selecting them for narrow implants should be with caution. How to cite this article Shabanpour R, Mousavi N, Ghodsi S, Alikhasi M. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments with Different Diameters. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(8):613-618.

scholarly journals Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth after apexification with calcium silicate-based materials

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evren Ok ◽  
Mustafa Altunsoy ◽  
Mehmet Tanriver ◽  
Ismail Davut Capar ◽  
Abdussamed Kalkan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Immature Teeth ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth filled with an apical barrier of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and Methods: Fifty-two single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were used. For standardization, the teeth were sectioned 6 mm above and 9 mm below the cementoenamel junction to simulate immature apex. Simulations of roots into immature apices were carried out using 1.5 mm diameter drills. The specimens were then randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 13) and one control group (n = 13). In experimental groups, MTA, Biodentine, and CEM were placed to apical 4 mm of the simulated immature roots. The samples were stored at 37°C and 100% humidity for 1 week. A load was applied on the crown of all teeth at 135° to their long axis until fracture. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post-hoc tests. Results: No statistically significant differences were found among MTA, CEM, and Biodentine (P > 0.05), and these groups demonstrated higher fracture resistance than control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Using any of the MTA, Biodentine, and CEM as an apical plug and restoring with fiber post and composite resin increases the fracture resistance of immature teeth.

scholarly journals Effect of Glass Fiber Post Adaptation on Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Lopes de Freitas ◽  
Rafael Pino Vitti ◽  
Milton Edson Miranda ◽  
William Cunha Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Glass Fiber Post ◽  
Push Out

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different glass fiber posts (GFPs) diameters on the push-out bond strength to dentin. Forty unirradicular human teeth were endodontically treated and used for cementation of GFPs (White Post DC, FGM) with different diameters (n=10): P1 - ø 1.6 mm coronal x 0.85 mm apical; P2 - ø 1.8 mm coronal x 1.05 mm apical; P5 - ø 1.4 mm coronal x 0.65 mm apical; and PC - customized post number 0.5 with composite resin (Tetric Ceram A2, Ivoclair Vivadent). All GFPs were cemented into the root canal using a dual-curing luting composite (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent). One slice (1.7 mm) of each root third of cemented GFP (cervical, middle, and apical) was submitted to push-out testing. Failure modes of all specimens were classified as: adhesive failure between resin cement and post; adhesive failure between dentin and resin cement; cohesive failure within resin cement, post or dentin; and mixed failure. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a=0.05). The highest bond strength values were presented for the P2 and PC groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the GFP thirds in each group. The groups P2, P5, and PC showed predominantly adhesive failure. For P1, the most prevalent type of failure was adhesive between resin cement and post. It may be concluded that a glass fiber post that is well adapted to the root canal presents higher bond strength values, regardless of GFP third.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document