Second primary malignancy: A retrospective analysis report from a tertiary cancer center of North India

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 595 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Sharma ◽  
G Singh ◽  
N Kakkar ◽  
S Raj
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa A Habib ◽  
Jasmine H Francis ◽  
Armida WM Fabius ◽  
Pierre Y Gobin ◽  
Ira J Dunkel ◽  
...  

Background/AimsSurvivors of retinoblastoma carry a lifetime risk of secondary malignancies. It is well established that external beam radiation increases this risk; however, the risk with ophthalmic artery chemosurgery (OAC) remains unknown. We report on 10 years of experience with OAC and the rate of second primary malignancy (SPM) development.MethodsThis is a single-centre retrospective review approved by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Institutional Review Board of all patients who received OAC over a 10-year period, from May 2006 to November 2016. The second tumour incidence and survival in patients with germline disease (bilateral and unilateral with family history or confirmed germline mutation) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients who received external beam radiotherapy were excluded from analyses.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-three patients with heritable retinoblastoma who received OAC were analysed. Nineteen patients were excluded for having received external beam radiation. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the likelihood for SPM development was 2.7% at 5 years (95% CI 0 to 25). All of the SPMs were pineoblastomas and all patients had bilateral disease in this cohort.ConclusionsIn our 10-year experience, we have found that SPM development in patients with germline retinoblastoma treated with OAC alone is comparable to previously published rates. In the first 10 years, OAC did not increase the known incidence of SPMs. This cohort will continue to be followed to establish the rate of development with extended follow-up.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Simeakis ◽  
Katerina Saltiki ◽  
Evangelia Zapanti ◽  
Evanthia Kassis ◽  
Maria Alevizaki

Head & Neck ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1042-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lin ◽  
Snehal G. Patel ◽  
Pen Yuan Chu ◽  
Jeannette M. S. Matsuo ◽  
Bhuvanesh Singh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Hong ◽  
Rongrong Wei ◽  
Chuang Nie ◽  
Anastasiia Leonteva ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598–0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638–0.650), respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document