scholarly journals Metastatic Bone Disease in Patients with Solid Tumors–-Burden of Bone Disease and the Role of Zoledronic Acid

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. CMT.S1958
Author(s):  
Vera Hirsh

Bisphosphonates have become an integral component of the therapeutic repertoire for cancer patients at risk for skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fractures, bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy, the need for orthopedic surgery, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy because of bone metastases. Administered via monthly 15-minute infusion of up to 4 mg (depending on creatinine clearance rate), zoledronic acid (ZOL) has been approved for preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from any solid tumor or bone lesions from multiple myeloma. Although there have been limited head-to-head comparison trials between bisphosphonates, ZOL displayed benefits beyond pamidronate in a large-scale comparative trial in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Monitoring of serum creatinine levels and oral health is important to ensure safety and comfort during treatment. In addition to the established benefits of bisphosphonates in the advanced cancer setting, there is a strong preclinical rationale and emerging clinical evidence that ZOL has antitumor activities and can delay metastasis in patients with early breast cancer. Studies are underway in patients with other tumor types, and the role of bisphosphonates is likely to evolve.

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 457-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Campagnaro ◽  
Melissa A. Reimers ◽  
Angel Qin ◽  
Ajjai S. Alva ◽  
Bryan J. Schneider ◽  
...  

The management of bone lesions from advanced solid tumors and multiple myeloma typically includes use of a bone-modifying agent to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events. Recent data demonstrate that when using zoledronic acid to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events in metastatic breast cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma, the dosing interval of zoledronic acid may be extended from every 4 weeks to every 12 weeks. The ASCO guidelines on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer and multiple myeloma address zoledronic acid dosing intervals. Herein, we discuss how new data on dosing of bone-modifying agents influence our clinical practice.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8529-8529 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Shirina ◽  
R. E. Coleman ◽  
Y. M. Chen

8529 Background: It has been postulated that greater numbers of bone metastases and thus greater tumor burden may lead to increased skeletal morbidity. To assess the effect that the number of baseline bone metastases may have on the efficacy of zoledronic acid in patients with solid tumors, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 3 large, randomized, controlled trials. Methods: Data were evaluated from the intent-to-treat population with breast cancer (n = 739), prostate cancer (n = 397), or lung cancer and other solid tumors (n = 480) who were treated with zoledronic acid 4 mg, pamidronate 90 mg, or placebo and had information available on number of baseline bone lesions. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those with ≤ 3 bone lesions or > 3 lesions. Results: In general, patients with > 3 lesions had a higher skeletal morbidity rate (SMR) compared with patients with ≤ 3 lesions (Table 1), and zoledronic acid reduced SREs regardless of the number of bone lesions, but the benefit of zoledronic acid appeared greater in patients with > 3 lesions. In patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors who had > 3 bone lesions, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the mean SMR (P = .008) and significantly prolonged time to first SRE (median, 171 vs 84 day; P = .005) compared with placebo. In prostate cancer patients with > 3 bone lesions, zoledronic acid also significantly reduced the mean SMR compared with placebo (Table 1). In breast cancer patients with > 3 bone lesions, the mean SMRs were similar for zoledronic acid and pamidronate groups (Table 1). Conclusions: Patients with a greater number of bone lesions are at higher risk for skeletal complications and receive greater clinical benefit from treatment with zoledronic acid. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 3022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella D’Oronzo ◽  
Erica Silvestris ◽  
Angelo Paradiso ◽  
Mauro Cives ◽  
Marco Tucci

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide and leads, in more than 70% of patients with advanced disease, to skeleton colonization and formation of bone metastases (BM). This condition implies a severe disability and deterioration of the quality of life, with consequent additional social costs. In recent decades, several studies explored the role of agents acting within the bone microenvironment to counteract BM development, and several bone-targeting agents (BTAs) have been introduced in the clinical practice to manage bone lesions and reduce the risk of skeletal complications. However, long-term exposure to these agents is not free from potential toxicities and needs careful monitoring. In this context, the potential capability to prevent BM onset in selected BC patients, through the early administration of BTAs, has been explored by several researchers, with the belief that “prevention is better than cure” and that, ultimately, metastatic BC is an incurable condition. Here, we revised the mechanisms of BM development in BC as well as the strategies for selecting high-risk patients suitable for early BTA treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andra Piciu ◽  
Alexandru Mester ◽  
George Rusu ◽  
Doina Piciu

Background: Thyroid carcinoma represents a complex pathology that can still be considered a medical challenge, despite having a better prognosis and life expectancy than most other neoplasms, also the scenario of multiple malignancies involving thyroid cancer is nowadays a common reality. Materials and methods: We reviewed the literature regarding the aggressive presentation of synchronous thyroid and breast cancer. In the current paper we are reporting the case of a 59 years-old woman, diagnosed with invasive ductal breast carcinoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma, presenting a natural history of both aggressive synchronous tumors. At the moment of hospitalization, the diagnostic was breast carcinoma with multiple secondary lesions, suggestive for lung and bone metastases, and nodular goiter. Results: Searching the literature PUBMED with the terms “thyroid carcinoma and synchronous breast carcinoma we found 86 studies; introducing the term “aggressive” the result included 4 studies, among them none being relevant for aggressive and synchronous. A similar search was done in SCOPUS finding 92 documents and after introducing the term aggressive, the number of papers was 8, none being for the synchronous aggressive metastatic thyroid and breast carcinoma. The majority of imaging diagnostic tools were used in this particular medical case, in order to ensure the best potential outcome. The final diagnostic was papillary thyroid carcinoma with lung and unusual multiple bone metastases and synchronous invasive ductal breast carcinoma with subcutaneous metastases. Conclusion: The case illustrates the challenges in correct assessment of oncologic patients, despite the advances in medical imaging and technologies and underlines the essential role of nuclear medicine procedures in the diagnostic and therapy protocols.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Francini ◽  
S Gonnelli ◽  
R Petrioli ◽  
F Conti ◽  
P Paffetti ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (Cl2MDP) on osteolytic and osteoblastic bone lesions from a variety of tumoral primary sites and to investigate the in vivo mechanism underlying the action of this drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-six patients participated in the current study: 59 had predominantly osteolytic lesions and 17 osteoblastic metastases. Sixteen patients had hypercalcemia. All of the patients received 300 mg of Cl2MDP intravenously (IV) for 7 days and then 200 mg of Cl2MDP intramuscularly (IM) for 14 days. Biochemical parameters were measured in the patients before the start of treatment and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after beginning treatment. After the withdrawal of parenteral Cl2MDP, 59 patients with predominantly osteolytic lesions were then randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (group A, 29 cases) or chemotherapy plus Cl2MDP given at an oral dose of 1,200 mg/d (group B, 30 cases). RESULTS Serum calcium (Ca), urinary calcium (UCa) phosphate (UPO4), and hydroxyproline (HOP) excretion levels significantly decreased in all patients, whereas no significant changes occurred in serum alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh) and bone Gla-protein (BGP) levels. In 56 patients with painful bone lesions, a progressive analgesic effect was observed mainly between day 7 and day 14. In patients with predominantly osteoblastic metastases, the Cl2MDP treatment led to a more evident hypocalcemia and an increase in both AlkPh and BGP. However, in the majority of these patients the hypocalcemia was corrected by the concurrent use of effective cytotoxic treatments capable of reducing osteoblast stimulation. During 6 months of follow-up, two pathologic fractures occurred in patients of group A, and none occurred in patients of group B. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that Cl2MDP was effective in patients presenting bone metastases with and without hypercalcemia. Care should be taken particularly in those patients with mixed metastases when the sclerotic component is predominant, as the drug may enhance the possibility of hypocalcemia, which is generally corrected by effective cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, Cl2MDP can be considered a valuable support in the treatment of bone metastases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 906-911
Author(s):  
Jamal Zekri ◽  
Kamel Farag ◽  
Osama Yousof ◽  
Yazeed Zabani ◽  
Wael Mohamed ◽  
...  

Introduction Bone metastases are common in patients with breast cancer and can lead to pain and skeletal-related events. Bone modifying agents are licensed to be used for these patients. We report the treatment patterns and outcome of zoledronic acid and denosumab in routine practice. Methodology Women with bone metastases from breast cancer who have started denosumab or zoledronic acid between 2011 and 2016 were eligible. Those with history of bone modifying agent use prior to diagnosis of bone metastases or with switching treatment between zoledronic acid and denosumab were excluded. Details of patients, tumors, bone modifying agent treatment, selected bone modifying agent toxicity, time to skeletal-related event development, and overall survival were collected retrospectively. Results In total, 163 women were eligible and included in this analysis. Number of skeletal-related events prior to starting bone modifying agents was 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 91 (55.8%), 53 (32.5%), 13 (8%), and 6 (3.7%), respectively. Zoledronic acid was started for 107 (65.6%) and denosumab for 56 (34.4%) patients. The proportion of patients receiving denosumab increased from 23.1 to 54.3% in years 2011 and 2016, respectively. Dose delay, reduction, and discontinuation due to toxicity were reported more frequently in patients receiving zoledronic acid. Denosumab delayed time to first on-treatment skeletal-related event compared with zoledronic acid (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41–0.98; log rank P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in median survival (zoledronic acid: 62 and denosumab: 58 months; log rank P = 0.956). Conclusion Denosumab is superior to zoledronic acid in reducing risk of skeletal-related events and in tolerance profile. However, overall survival is similar with both treatments. Our findings mirror those reported in scrutinized environment of landmark clinical trials.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 846-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Theriault ◽  
Allan Lipton ◽  
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi ◽  
Richard Leff ◽  
Stefan Glück ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To assess whether pamidronate can reduce the frequency of skeletal morbidity in women with lytic bone metastases from breast cancer treated with hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-two women with breast cancer who had at least one lytic bone lesion and who were receiving hormonal therapy were randomized to receive 90 mg of pamidronate or placebo as a 2-hour intravenous infusion given in double-blind fashion every 4 weeks for 24 cycles. Patients were evaluated for skeletal complications: pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, irradiation of or surgery on bone, or hypercalcemia. The skeletal morbidity rate (the ratio of the number of skeletal complications to the time on trial) was the primary efficacy variable. Bone pain, use of analgesics, quality of life, performance status, bone tumor response, and biochemical parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients who received pamidronate and 189 who received placebo were assessable. The skeletal morbidity rate was significantly reduced at 12, 18, and 24 cycles in patients treated with 90 mg of pamidronate (P = .028, .023, and .008, respectively). At 24 cycles, the proportion of patients having had any skeletal complication was 56% in the pamidronate group and 67% in the placebo group (P = .027). The time to the first skeletal complication was longer for patients receiving pamidronate than for those given placebo (P = .049). There was no statistical difference in survival or in objective bone response rate. Pamidronate was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 90 mg of pamidronate as a 2-hour intravenous infusion every 4 weeks in addition to hormonal therapy significantly reduces skeletal morbidity from osteolytic metastases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document