scholarly journals Satellite Derived Geospatial Irrigation Performance Indicators for Benchmarking Studies of Irrigation Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Suresh Babu ◽  
M. Shanker ◽  
V. Venkateshwar Rao
Author(s):  
Zulhadi Lalu

Irrigation facilities is one of the key factors in farming, especially for food crop farming, including rice. A smallscale irrigation system has an area of less than 500 hectares, and it is the backbone of family food security which in turn will lead to national food security. Damage irrigation system networks will threaten food production increase. In the future, irrigation infrastructure must be better managed so that agricultural sector can realize agricultural diversification, conserve wider irrigation system and maintain local wisdom and social capital in irrigation management. The objective of the paper is to analyze performance, problems and solutions of small irrigation systems in Indonesia, including small irrigation concepts and understanding, small irrigation performance and development, small irrigation development policies, factors affecting smallscale irrigation development, investments, and prospects. The paper also compares various performances, problems and solutions of small irrigation systems in other countries. Small scale irrigation performance is often better than large-scale irrigation, in the sense of water availability throughout the year and equitable water distribution for all service areas


Author(s):  
Edgar Muhoyi ◽  
Josue Mbonigaba

Small-scale irrigation schemes (SSIS) in developing countries have been crucial, but the evidence about their performance has not been sufficiently analyzed. This chapter documents such evidence by reviewing and classifying the performance indicators. It also assesses literature on whether there are discernible trends in the efficiency of SSIS, identifies and classifies SSIS constraints, and characterizes various channels through which SSIS might affect poverty. Objectives are achieved via a systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2017. Results indicate a lack of standardization of irrigation performance indicators, and there is evidence that irrigation has boosted agricultural performance. Even though SSIS were associated with higher productivity than rain-fed agriculture, they performed below their full potential due to undervaluation of irrigation water by irrigation authorities, farmer characteristics, costs, institutional setups, the policy environment, and design, cultural, community, and environmental issues. SSIS are important tools for poverty reduction, and relevant policy implications are outlined.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 2949
Author(s):  
Megan Blatchford ◽  
Chris M. Mannaerts ◽  
Yijian Zeng ◽  
Hamideh Nouri ◽  
Poolad Karimi

This paper analyses the effect of the spatial assessment scale on irrigation performance indicators in small and medium-scale agriculture. Three performance indicators—adequacy (i.e., sufficiency of water use to meet the crop water requirement), equity (i.e., fairness of irrigation distribution), and productivity (i.e., unit of physical crop production/yield per unit water consumption)—are evaluated in five irrigation schemes for three spatial resolutions—250 m, 100 m, and 30 m. Each scheme has varying plot sizes and distributions, with average plot sizes ranging from 0.2 ha to 13 ha. The datasets are derived from the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) water productivity through open access of remotely sensed–derived data (the Water Productivity Open Access Portal—WaPOR) database. Irrigation indicators performed differently in different aspects; for adequacy, all three resolutions show similar spatial trends for relative evapotranspiration (ET) across levels for all years. However, the estimation of relative ET is often higher at higher resolution. In terms of equity, all resolutions show similar inter-annual trends in the coefficient of variation (CV); higher resolutions usually have a higher CV of the annual evapotranspiration and interception (ETIa) while capturing more spatial variability. For productivity, higher resolutions show lower crop water productivity (CWP) due to higher aboveground biomass productivity (AGBP) estimations in lower resolutions; they always have a higher CV of CWP. We find all resolutions of 250 m, 100 m, and 30 m suitable for inter-annual and inter-scheme assessments regardless of plot size. While each resolution shows consistent temporal trends, the magnitude of the trend in both space and time is smoothed by the 100 m and 250 m resolution datasets. This frequently results in substantial differences in the irrigation performance assessment criteria for inter-plot comparisons; therefore, 250 m and 100 m are not recommended for inter-plot comparison for all plot sizes, particularly small plots (<2 ha). Our findings highlight the importance of selecting the spatial resolution appropriate to scheme characteristics when undertaking irrigation performance assessment using remote sensing.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Rowshon ◽  
M. S. M. Amin ◽  
S. M. H. Hassan ◽  
A. R. M. Shariff ◽  
T. S. Lee

2011 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Salvador ◽  
A. Martínez-Cob ◽  
J. Cavero ◽  
E. Playán

Author(s):  
Francisco de Oliveira Mesquita ◽  
Rafael Oliveira Batista ◽  
Daniela Costa Leite Coelho ◽  
Ketson Bruno da Silva ◽  
Antonio Gustavo de Luna Souto ◽  
...  

The landfill percolate (LP) has appreciable amounts of nutrients that can be used in the production of biomass for energy purposes and serves as parameters to study the performance of irrigation systems. The objective of this work is to analyze the drip performance indicators applying diluted landfill percolate, well as the main obstruction factors and the percolate quality. The experiment was assembled up in split-plot scheme with kind drippers (G1 - non-pressure compensated; G2 - pressure compensated; G3 - pressure compensated; and G4 - pressure compensated) in the plot and operating times (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 h) in subplots, with four replications. The flow rates tested in the main and secondary plots in this work were: main plots - types of drippers (G1 - 1,6 L h-1; G2 - 2,0 L h-1, G3 - 4,0 L h-1 e G4 - 8,0 L h-1) and in the subplots the operating times (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140 e 160 h), with four replications. The suspended solid and dissolved solids attributes present a severe risk of dripper obstruction for the diluted landfill percolate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document