Rules for the Rulemakers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Beck
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
The Way

Maximal flexibility of rules, or ease of reuse — choose one. The tighter the rules, the more consistent documents will be and the easier it will be to reuse them, but only if the rules are reasonable enough to be adopted. (If all the data creators ignore the rules, reuse doesn’t get easier.) JATS4R (JATS for Reuse) is a NISO working group devoted to optimizing the reusability of scholarly content by developing best-practice recommendations for tagging content in JATS XML. The group has devoted particular attention to the flexibility/reuse tradeoff for rules on attribute use and controlled values, and we eventually decided that we needed some rules for ourselves, on how to write rules for attributes in our recommendations. In the process of developing our guidance document for writing rules for attribute values in our recommendations, we learned (or at least articulated) some things along the way.

scholarly journals A CTSA One Health Alliance guidance on institutional review of veterinary clinical studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Moore ◽  
◽  
A. O’Kell ◽  
H. Borghese ◽  
R. Garabed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
One Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Regulatory Review ◽  
Protocol Review ◽  
Health Alliance

AbstractHarmonized institutional processes and reviewer training are vital to maintain integrity and ethical rigor of the veterinary clinical research pipeline and are a prerequisite to future work that might establish centralized or single-site ethical and regulatory review to ease initiation of multi-center studies. Funded by a CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA) pilot award, a diverse working group of veterinary clinicians and institutional representatives was convened in February 2020 to develop a guidance document detailing broadly agreed upon practices for ethical review and approval of veterinary clinical studies conducted in the United States.The working group defined key areas of need for consensus, developed a set of associated guidelines, and circulated these for review by COHA’s fifteen member institutions. Six focus areas were identified by the working group and included vital items of protocol review, composition of the review committee, post-approval monitoring and adverse event reporting, consideration of special circumstances such as satellite sites and the use of healthy veterinary subjects in research, and the informed consent process.This document outlines a broadly agreed-upon framework through which to approach vital items associated with veterinary clinical study protocol review and approval. These approaches represent current best practice in the review and approval of veterinary clinical studies, and can serve as a guidance for veterinary clinician-scientists and regulatory experts, to ensure robust and ethically conducted studies that can contribute to the advancement of both animal and human health.

scholarly journals Best Practice Guideline – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound – Part I – Examination technique, DEGUM ultrasound criteria, and documentation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Bader ◽  
Claudia Maria Vogel-Minea ◽  
Jens-Uwe Blohmer ◽  
Volker Duda ◽  
Christian Eichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Interdisciplinary Communication ◽  
German Society ◽  
Breast Ultrasound ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Expert Working Group ◽  
A Current

AbstractFor many years, breast ultrasound has been used in addition to mammography as an important method for clarifying breast findings. However, differences in the interpretation of findings continue to be problematic 1 2. These differences decrease the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound after detection of a finding and complicate interdisciplinary communication and the comparison of scientific studies 3. In 1999, the American College of Radiology (ACR) created a working group (International Expert Working Group) that developed a classification system for ultrasound examinations based on the established BI-RADS classification of mammographic findings under consideration of literature data 4. Due to differences in content, the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) published its own BI-RADS-analogue criteria catalog in 2006 3. In addition to the persistence of differences in content, there is also an issue with formal licensing with the current 5th edition of the ACR BI-RADS catalog, even though the content is recognized by the DEGUM as another system for describing and documenting findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guideline of the Breast Ultrasound Working Group of the DEGUM is to provide colleagues specialized in senology with a current catalog of ultrasound criteria and assessment categories as well as best practice recommendations for the various ultrasound modalities.

Best practice for chronic oedema in community settings: what can we learn?

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 610-614
Author(s):  
Garry Cooper-Stanton
Keyword(s):  
Service Provision ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Tissue Viability ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Specialist Nurses ◽  
The Uk

There are various opportunities and challenges in the delivery of care to those diagnosed with chronic oedema/lymphoedema. Service provision is not consistent within the UK, and non-specialist nurses and other health professionals may be called on to fill the gaps in this area. The latest best practice guidance on chronic oedema is directed at community services that care for people within their own homes in primary care. This guide was developed in order to increase awareness, knowledge and access to an evidence base. Those involved in its creation cross specialist fields (lymphoedema and tissue viability), resulting in the document covering a number of areas, including an explanation of chronic oedema, its assessment and management and the association between chronic oedema and wet legs. The document complements existing frameworks on the condition and its management and also increases the available tools within chronic oedema management in the community. The present article provides an overview of the guidance document and discusses its salient features.

Illuminating the decision-making strategies of anesthesia providers in challenging cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 653-657
Author(s):  
Joshua Biro ◽  
David M. Neyens ◽  
Candace Jaruzel ◽  
Catherine D. Tobin ◽  
Myrtede Alfred ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Medication Delivery ◽  
Anesthesia Providers ◽  
Healthcare Work ◽  
Realistic View

Medication errors and error-related scenarios in anesthesia remain an important area of research. Interventions and best practice recommendations in anesthesia are often based in the work-as-imagined healthcare system, remaining under-used due to a range of unforeseen complexities in healthcare work-as- done. In order to design adaptable anesthesia medication delivery systems, a better understanding of clinical cognition within the context of anesthesia work is needed. Fourteen interviews probing anesthesia providers’ decision making were performed. The results revealed three overarching themes: (1) anesthesia providers find cases challenging when they have incomplete information, (2) decision-making begins with information seeking, and (3) attributes such as expertise, experience, and work environment influence anesthesia providers’ information seeking and synthesis of tasks. These themes and the context within this data help create a more realistic view of work-as-done and generate insights into what potential medication error reducing interventions should look to avoid and what they could help facilitate.

scholarly journals Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Secondary Prevention of Stroke Update 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-69
Author(s):  
David J. Gladstone ◽  
M. Patrice Lindsay ◽  
James Douketis ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendations

Best Practice Recommendations for Optimizing Care in Structural Heart Programs: Planning Efficient and Resource Leveraging Systems (PEARLS)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Perpetua ◽  
Kimberly A. Guibone ◽  
Patricia A. Keegan ◽  
Roseanne Palmer ◽  
Martina K. Speight ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Resource Leveraging
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document