Roof Strength Requirement for Vehicles Involved in Rollover Crash

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreekanta Das ◽  
Sudip Bhattacharjee ◽  
Pratanu Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Orlowski ◽  
R. Thomas Bundorf ◽  
Edward A. Moffatt

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (sup2) ◽  
pp. S209-S216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Kerrigan ◽  
Jacek Toczyski ◽  
Carolyn Roberts ◽  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Mark Clauser
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mark W. Arndt ◽  
Stephen M. Arndt ◽  
Donald Stevens

A study of numerous published rollover tests was conducted by reexamination of the original works, analysis of their data, and centralized compilation of their results. Instances were identified where the original reported results for trip speed were in error, requiring revision because the analysis technique employed extrapolation versus integration and lacked correction for offset errors that develop by placing the Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna away from the vehicle Center of Gravity (CG). An analysis was performed demonstrating revised results. In total, 81 dolly rollover crash tests, 24 naturally occurring rollover crash tests, and 102 reconstructed rollovers were identified. Of the 24 naturally occurring tests, 18 were steer-induced rollover tests. Distributions of the rollover drag factors are presented. The range of drag factors for all examined dolly rollovers was 0.38 g to 0.50 g with the upper and lower 15 percent statistically trimmed. The average drag factor for dolly rollovers was 0.44 g (standard deviation = 0.064) with a reported minimum of 0.31 g and a reported maximum of 0.61 g. After revisions, the range of drag factors for the set of naturally occurring rollovers was 0.39 g to 0.50 g with the upper and lower 15 percent statistically trimmed. The average drag factor for naturally occurring rollovers was 0.44 g (standard deviation = 0.063) with a reported minimum of 0.33 g and a reported maximum of 0.57 g. These results provide a more probable range of the drag factor for use in accident reconstruction compared to the often repeated assertion that rollover drag factors range between 0.4 g and 0.65 g.


2015 ◽  
Vol 798 ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Hong Yin Wang ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Xiong Long Tao

Lighter weight commercial vehicles facilitate faster transport, higher mobility and fuel conservation. Weight reduction and safety are mutually competing objectives. And the safety should not be compromised after weight reduction. Full size crash tests are expensive and time consuming to organize. Using a numerical simulation for predicting crash to the occupants’ safety can minimize the number of such trials. In this paper three virtual crash simulations for the three load cases: Front impact test, Roof strength test and Rear wall strength test are performed according to the European regulation ECE-R29. The explicit finite element program LS-DYNA is used for that purpose. The comparisons between simulation results and test data available in the literature are also presented in this paper.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 550-556
Author(s):  
M. S. Risby ◽  
Khalis Suhaimi ◽  
Tan Kean Sheng ◽  
Arif Syafiq M. S. ◽  
Mohd Hafizi N

Mass properties such as the centre of gravity location, moments of inertia, and total mass are of great importance for vehicle stability studies and deployment. Certain parameters are required when these vehicles need to be arranged inside an aircraft for the carrier to achieve proper mass balance and stability during a flight. These parameters are also important for the design and modelling process of vehicle rollover crash studies. In this study, the mass properties of a military armoured vehicle were estimated using hoisting and pendulum method. The gross total weight, longitudinal and vertical measurements were recorded by lifting the vehicle using a mobile crane and the data were used to estimate the centre of gravity. The frequency of vehicle oscillation was measured by applying swing motion with a small angle of the vehicle as it is suspended on air. The centre of gravity and mass moment of inertia were calculated using the vector mechanics approach. The outcomes and limitations of the approach as discussed in details.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document