Optimal Tire Force Control & amp; Allocation for Longitudinal and Yaw Moment Control of HEV with eAWD Capabilities

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-233
Author(s):  
Jose Velazquez Alcantar ◽  
Francis Assadian ◽  
Ming Kuang
Author(s):  
Yaqi Dai ◽  
Jian Song ◽  
Liangyao Yu

By analyzing the key safety problems under the front-outside-tire burst steering condition, a vehicle stability control strategy is proposed in this paper, which is based on active front steering and differential braking systems. Taken both the handling stability and safety into account, we divided the whole control strategy into two layers, which are yaw moment control layer and the additional steering angle & tire force distribution layer. To solve the similar linear problem concisely, the LQR control is adopted in the yaw moment control layer. To achieve the goal of providing enough additional lateral force and yaw moment while keeping the burst tire in appropriate condition, the additional steering angle provided by active front steering system and the tire force distribution was adjusted step by step. To test the proposed control strategy performance, we modelling a basic front-outside-tire burst steering condition, in which the tire blows out once the vertical pressure reach the predefined critical value. Through simulation on different adhesion coefficient road, the control strategy proposed in this paper performance quite better compare with the uncontrolled one in aspect of movement, burst tire protection, handling stability.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008.17 (0) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shogo KANAGAWA ◽  
Takayoshi KAMADA ◽  
Masao NAGAI ◽  
Nobuo MASAKI ◽  
Haruo IWANO

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006.15 (0) ◽  
pp. 233-236
Author(s):  
Akiko TAIRA ◽  
Takayoshi KAMADA ◽  
Osamu NAGAI ◽  
Nobuo MASAKI ◽  
Haruo IWANO

Author(s):  
Avesta Goodarzi ◽  
Fereydoon Diba ◽  
Ebrahim Esmailzadeh

Basically, there are two main techniques to control the vehicle yaw moment. First method is the indirect yaw moment control, which works on the basis of active steering control (ASC). The second one being the direct yaw moment control (DYC), which is based on either the differential braking or the torque vectoring. An innovative idea for the direct yaw moment control is introduced by using an active controller system to supervise the lateral dynamics of vehicle and perform as an active yaw moment control system, denoted as the stabilizer pendulum system (SPS). This idea has further been developed, analyzed, and implemented in a standalone direct yaw moment control system, as well as, in an integrated vehicle dynamic control system with a differential braking yaw moment controller. The effectiveness of SPS has been evaluated by model simulation, which illustrates its superior performance especially on low friction roads.


Vehicles ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-144
Author(s):  
Andoni Medina ◽  
Guillermo Bistue ◽  
Angel Rubio

Direct Yaw Moment Control (DYC) is an effective way to alter the behaviour of electric cars with independent drives. Controlling the torque applied to each wheel can improve the handling performance of a vehicle making it safer and faster on a race track. The state-of-the-art literature covers the comparison of various controllers (PID, LPV, LQR, SMC, etc.) using ISO manoeuvres. However, a more advanced comparison of the important characteristics of the controllers’ performance is lacking, such as the robustness of the controllers under changes in the vehicle model, steering behaviour, use of the friction circle, and, ultimately, lap time on a track. In this study, we have compared the controllers according to some of the aforementioned parameters on a modelled race car. Interestingly, best lap times are not provided by perfect neutral or close-to-neutral behaviour of the vehicle, but rather by allowing certain deviations from the target yaw rate. In addition, a modified Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller showed that its performance is comparable to other more complex control techniques such as Model Predictive Control (MPC).


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 2428-2440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxu Zhang ◽  
Jing Li

This paper presents an integrated vehicle chassis control (IVCC) strategy to improve vehicle handling and stability by coordinating active front steering (AFS) and direct yaw moment control (DYC) in a hierarchical way. In high-level control, the corrective yaw moment is calculated by the fast terminal sliding mode control (FTSMC) method, which may improve the transient response of the system, and a non-linear disturbance observer (NDO) is used to estimate and compensate for the model uncertainty and external disturbance to suppress the chattering of FTSMC. In low-level control, the null-space-based control reallocation method and inverse tyre model are utilized to transform the corrective yaw moment to the desired longitudinal slips and the steer angle increment of front wheels by considering the constraints of actuators and friction ellipse of each wheel. Finally, the performance of the proposed control strategy is verified through simulations of various manoeuvres based on vehicle dynamic software CarSim.


Author(s):  
Wei Liang ◽  
Hai Yu ◽  
Ryan McGee ◽  
Ming Kuang ◽  
Jure Medanic

2016 ◽  
pp. 631-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kobayashi ◽  
H. Sugiura ◽  
E. Ono ◽  
E. Katsuyama ◽  
M. Yamamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document