scholarly journals A Sustainable and Effective Mentorship Model for Graduate Medical Education Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Caruso ◽  
Tiffany Kung ◽  
Nancy Piro ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Laurence Katznelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Full Time Equivalent ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Mentor Relationships ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Background  Mentorship models rarely seek generalizability across training programs at the graduate medical education (GME) level. Objective  We examined the sustainability and effectiveness of an intervention to increase the number and usefulness of trainee mentorship. Methods  A 0.20 full-time equivalent GME faculty adviser position (MD, MEd) implemented mentorship programs in residencies and fellowships. In group 1, 6 GME programs implemented the mentorship strategies prior to 2014, which were used to measure whether the number of mentor relationships were longitudinally sustained. In group 2, 10 different GME programs implemented the mentorship strategies in 2016, which were used to measure whether the intervention immediately increased the number of mentor relationships. To measure mentorship usefulness, trainees rated mentors' ability to promote clinical skills and personal and professional development. The remaining programs were the comparison. Responses from the 2014 and 2016 annual institutional trainee survey were analyzed. Results  The incidence of group 1 reporting mentor relationships in 2014 compared to the incidence of group 1 in 2016 were 89% (41 of 46) and 95% (42 of 44), respectively, suggesting that the intervention was sustained for 2 years (P = .26). Group 2 showed a higher proportion of trainees reporting mentors in 2016 (88%, 149 of 170) compared to preintervention (66%, 71 of 108; P = .00001). Groups 1 and 2 reported significant increases in mentorship usefulness. Conclusions  A GME initiative to enhance mentoring across specialties in 16 GME training programs was self-sustaining and effective.

scholarly journals The “Zing Factor”—How Do Faculty Describe the Best Pediatrics Residents?

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Rosenbluth ◽  
Bridget O'Brien ◽  
Emily M. Asher ◽  
Christine S. Cho
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Knowledge Integration ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Trained Interviewer ◽  
And Behaviors ◽  
Assessment Strategies

Abstract Background Faculty in graduate medical education programs may not have uniform approaches to differentiating the quality of residents, and reviews of evaluations suggest that faculty use different standards when assessing residents. Standards for assessing residents also do not consistently map to items on evaluation forms. One way to improve assessment is to reach consensus on the traits and behaviors that are (or should be) present in the best residents. Methods A trained interviewer conducted semistructured interviews with faculty affiliated with 2 pediatrics residency programs until content saturation was achieved. Interviewees were asked to describe specific traits present in residents they identify as the best. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. We used an iterative, inductive approach to generate a coding scheme and identify common themes. Results From 23 interviews, we identified 7 thematic categories of traits and behaviors: personality, energy, professionalism, team behaviors, self-improvement behaviors, patient-interaction behaviors, and medical knowledge and clinical skills (including a subcategory, knowledge integration). Most faculty interviewees focused on traits like passion, enthusiasm, maturity, and reliability. Examination score or intelligence was mentioned less frequently than traits and behaviors categorized under personality and professionalism. Conclusions Faculty identified many traits and behaviors in the residents they define as the best. The thematic categories had incomplete overlap with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and CanMEDS competencies. This research highlights the ongoing need to review our assessment strategies, and may have implications for the ACGME Milestone Project.

A Survey of the Work Effort of Full-time Surgeons of the Southeastern Surgical Congress

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 674-681
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Gadacz ◽  
James J. Bason
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Work Effort ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Community Activities ◽  
Significant Difference

This is a survey research project to determine the work hours of practicing surgeons and compare those hours with hours that have been mandated for graduate medical education programs by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The survey conducted of the membership of the Southeastern Surgical Congress focused on the amount of time devoted to professional activity. Although several categories of membership were surveyed, those surgeons in full-time practice were used for this report. Five hundred ninety-two general surgeons and some surgical specialties from 17 states reported a total professional work effort of 65 hours per week averaged over a month. Twenty per cent reported working more than 80 hours per week. Statistically significant ( P < 0.05) factors that characterized these individuals included years in practice (1 to 10 years), more clinical hours per week, fewer administrative hours per week, fewer teaching hours per week, fewer continuing medical education (CME) hours per year, and an increase in recent clinical practice. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in CME over a 2- or 5-year period. Other factors such as type of practice did not have statistical significance. There was no difference between states and no difference in time commitment to political or community activities. This survey indicates that surgeons going into practice in the Southeast from general surgery graduate medical education programs can expect to have a mean work week of 65 hours, and 20 per cent can expect to exceed an 80-hour work week.

A challenging and rewarding time: The early days of graduate medical education in dermatology

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Margaret Maria Cocks
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Personal Reflections

Specialized residency training was still in its infancy in mid-20th century America. While specialty boards in various fields such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology had been established in the 1920s and 1930s, the details of training programs were still being fine-tuned and formal curricula were lacking. In dermatology, three prominent physicians including Harry L. Arnold Jr., J. Lamar Callaway and Walter B. Shelley trained during these experimental days of medical education. Each of them captured personal reflections of their own training experiences in brief memoirs published in scientific journals. A closer examination of these texts provides unique insights into how dermatology subspecialty training in particular and medical education more broadly evolved during this period.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of evidence evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals Quality and Safety Training in Primary Care: Making an Impact

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Byrne ◽  
Susan Hall ◽  
Sam Baz ◽  
Todd Kessler ◽  
Maher Roman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Knowledge Test ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Quality And Patient Safety

Abstract Purpose Preparing residents for future practice, knowledge, and skills in quality improvement and safety (QI/S) is a requisite element of graduate medical education. Despite many challenges, residency programs must consider new curricular innovations to meet the requirements. We report the effectiveness of a primary care QI/S curriculum and the role of the chief resident in quality and patient safety in facilitating it. Method Through the Veterans Administration Graduate Medical Education Enhancement Program, we added a position for a chief resident in quality and patient safety, and 4 full-time equivalent internal medicine residents, to develop the Primary Care Interprofessional Patient-Centered Quality Care Training Curriculum. The curriculum includes a first-or second-year, 1-month block rotation that serves as a foundational experience in QI/S and interprofessional care. The responsibilities of the chief resident in quality and patient safety included organizing and teaching the QI/S curriculum and mentoring resident projects. Evaluation included prerotation and postrotation surveys of self-assessed QI/S knowledge, abilities, skills, beliefs, and commitment (KASBC); an end-of-the-year KASBC; prerotation and postrotation knowledge test; and postrotation and faculty surveys. Results Comparisons of prerotation and postrotation KASBC indicated significant self-assessed improvements in 4 of 5 KASBC domains: knowledge (P &lt; .001), ability (P &lt; .001), skills (P &lt; .001), and belief (P &lt; .03), which were sustained on the end-of-the-year survey. The knowledge test demonstrated increased QI/S knowledge (P  =  .002). Results of the postrotation survey indicate strong satisfaction with the curriculum, with 76% (25 of 33) and 70% (23 of 33) of the residents rating the quality and safety curricula as always or usually educational. Most faculty members acknowledged that the chief resident in quality and patient safety enhanced both faculty and resident QI/S interest and participation in projects. Conclusions Our primary care QI/S curriculum was associated with improved and persistent resident self-perceived knowledge, abilities, and skills and increased knowledge-based scores of QI/S. The chief resident in quality and patient safety played an important role in overseeing the curriculum, teaching, and providing leadership.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background: With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods: Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results: 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions: Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals Social Accountability and Graduate Medical Education

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Kaufman ◽  
Mary Alice Scott ◽  
John Andazola ◽  
Danielle Fitzsimmons-Pattison ◽  
Laura Parajón
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Current System ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
Structural Determinants ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Incentive Structures ◽  
Training Physicians

Because graduate medical education (GME) is largely publicly funded, it should be judged on how well it addresses the public’s health needs. However, the current system distributes GME resources inequitably by specialty and geography, and neglects to focus on training physicians adequately in the care of populations while reducing health disparities. Instead, GME continues to concentrate training in hospital-based academic centers and in subspecialties, which often exacerbates disparities in health outcomes and access to care. GME can be more socially accountable by shifting incentive structures to support primary care, creating more equitable distribution of residency slots and funding, and promoting training programs that focus on social and structural determinants of health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document