scholarly journals Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Experience at Aga Khan University Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-79
Author(s):  
Abdallah Abdulkarim ◽  
Brian Misoi ◽  
Daniel Gathege
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Hemorrhoidectomy

Background: Hemorrhoidal disease is the commonest benign anal condition diagnosed in the outpatient setup. Interventional treatment options range widely, from office-based procedures to hemorrhoidectomy. Laser technology increasingly is in use in the field of proctology. We present our index clinical outcomes following laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LHP). Methodology: Retrospective cross-sectional study of 21 consecutive patients who underwent LHP between 2015 and 2018 under a single surgeon. Their outcomes were compared with a group of patients who underwent the standard open hemorrhoidectomy over the same period of time. Results: Postoperatively, 85.7% of patients post-LHP had a better pain score (mild) compared with 66.7% in the open hemorrhoidectomy group. The mean operative time in minutes was shorter for LHP, 29.67±17.50 versus 39.20±20.77 in the open group. Duration of hospital stay in days between the two groups were similar; LHP group median=1(1–3), open group median =1(1–3). Rates of infection, recurrence and urinary complications were however higher in the laser group, 4.8%, 9.5% and 9.5% respectively compared with the open hemorrhoidectomy group that were 0%, 6.7% and 6.7 % respectively. Both groups had no reported cases of stool or flatus incontinence. Conclusion: Laser haemorrhoidoplasty is associated with reduced pain scores and shorter operative time than open hemorrhoidectomy. Duration of hospital stay was similar in both groups. The rate of complications was high in the study group. Keywords: Laser haemorrhoidoplasty, Pain score, Complications, Open hemorrhoidectomy

scholarly journals A Single Surgeon’s Experience of Total Extra Peritoneal Repair Vs Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair- A Prospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam ◽  
Koshy Mathew Panicker ◽  
Jeyakumar Sundaraj ◽  
Sidhu Rajasekhar ◽  
Pradeep Joshua Christopher
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
P Value ◽  
Tep Repair ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Tapp Repair ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Hernia surgery has evolved over a period of 2500 years from the Bassini-Shouldice era to conventional Lichenstein’s meshplasty to the laparoscopic era. Since, inception of the laparoscopic approach 25 years ago, there were several advancements in the techniques of inguinal hernia repairs. The two most commonly practiced laparoscopic approaches are the Total Extra Peritoneal (TEP) and Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Aim: To compare the outcomes for TEP and TAPP approaches in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in terms of operative time consumed, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, complications and recurrence rate when performed by a single surgeon. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional cohort study was carried out among 70 patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia. Patients were divided equally into two groups of 35 patients and underwent TAPP and TEP repairs depending on group randomisation. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Factors including operative time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, complications and recurrence were documented and compared for both the groups. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the mean between the two groups. The p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The mean operative time measured in minutes for TEP repair was 31.03 minutes and TAPP repair was 42.26 showing a difference of 11.23 minutes which was statistically significant (p-0.001). The mean Standard Deviation (SD) pain score at 24 hours for TEP repair was 2.43 (1.195) and TAPP repair was 3.43 (0.917). The mean (SD) pain score at 48 hours for TEP repair was 1.31 (1.051) and TAPP repair was 2.20 (0.901). The mean (SD) pain score at one week for TEP repair was 0.37 (0.690) and TAPP repair was 0.91 (0.781). The mean (SD) duration of hospital stay in TEP repair was 2.60 days (0.553) when compared to 3.49 days (0.658) in TAPP repair. All the results were statistically significant with a p-value of 0.001. Conclusion: TEP repair had superior outcomes in terms of reduction in operative time, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay than TAPP repair.

Laparoscopic or classic splenectomy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-137
Author(s):  
Aleš Zatloukal ◽  
Anton Pelikán ◽  
Peter Ihnát
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Splenectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Operation ◽  
Open Operation ◽  
Laparotomy Group ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Introduction: With current development of mini-invasive techniques, laparoscopic splenectomy also gained its place under the sun. The goal of this study is to compare the results of open and laparoscopic splenectomy performed at Clinic of Surgery of University Hospital Ostrava in the period 2010–2019. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study during the period 2010–2019 were counted: an operation time, a need of blood transfusions, weight, complications and duration of hospital stay. A group of patients with laparoscopic operation was compared to a group with an open operation, using the t-test. Results: During the period 2010–2019, we performed 23 laparoscopic splenectomies and 15 classic operations. Unfortunately, the comparison of both groups is difficult. The splenic weight differs in both groups statistically significantly (P = 0.0001). The patients in the classic laparotomy group had much bigger spleens and in four cases, the splenectomy was performed together with metastasectomy of the liver, diaphragmatic resection and resection of the tale of pancreas. Even then the operative time was significantly shorter than the operative time of laparoscopic operation – the operative times differ in both groups statistically significantly (P = 0.0001). The need of blood transfusion and operative complications appear to be comparable in both techniques. The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the patients with laparoscopic operation. Conclusion: Laparoscopic splenectomy off ers all the general benefi ts of mini-invasive operative techniques and is suitable method for patients undergoing elective splenectomy especially for spleens smaller than 20 cm in diameter. We consider portal hypertension and severe comorbidities of the patient to be a contraindication. It seems to us that the main problem of this method lies in a very small number of operated patients and thus in a limited possibility to obtain sufficient surgical erudition, which is probably the case of some complications and insufficient use of this method in practice. It is highly desirable to concentrate these services in the centers.

EVALUATION OF LONGO’S HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2012 ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Van Lieu Nguyen ◽  
Doan Van Phu Nguyen ◽  
Thanh Phuc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anal Pain ◽  
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Fourth Degree ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Good For

Introduction: Since Longo First described it in 1998, Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy has been emerging as the procedure of choice for symtomatic hemorrhoid. Several studies have shown it to be a safe, effective and relative complication free procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of (SH) as a day cas procedure at Hue University Hospital. Methods: From Decembre 2009 to April 2012, 384 patients with third- degree and fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy were included in this study. Parameters recorded included postoperative complications, analegic requirements, duration of hospital stay and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed at 1 month and 3 months post-operative. Results: Of the 384 patients that underwent a Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy 252 (65,7%) were male and 132 (34,3%) were female. The mean age was 47,5 years (range 17-76 years. Duration of hospital stay: The mean day was 2,82 ± 1,15 days (range 1-6 days). There were no perioperative complications. There was one case postoperative complication: hemorrhage; Follow-up after surgery: 286 (74,4%) patients had less anal pain, 78 (20,3%) patients had moderate anal pain, 3 (0,8%) patients had urinary retention; Follow-up after one month: good for 325 (84,6%) patients, average for 59 (15,4%) patients; Follow-up after three months: good for 362 (94,3%) patients, average for 22 (5,7%) patients. Conclusion: Our present study shows that Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy is a safe, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and a faster return to unrestricted daily activity

scholarly journals An assessment of the quality indicators of operative and non-operative times in a public university hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altair da Silva Costa Jr ◽  
Luiz Eduardo Villaça Leão ◽  
Maykon Anderson Pires de Novais ◽  
Paola Zucchi
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Public University ◽  
Major Effect ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Using Data

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the operative time indicators in a public university hospital. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using data from operating room database. The sample was obtained from January 2011 to January 2012. The operations performed in sequence in the same operating room, between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm, elective or emergency, were included. The procedures with incomplete data in the system were excluded, as well as the operations performed after 5:00 pm or on weekends or holidays. Results We measured the operative and non-operative time of 8,420 operations. The operative time (mean and standard deviation) of anesthesias and operations were 177.6±110 and 129.8±97.1 minutes, respectively. The total time of the patient in operative room (mean and standard deviation) was 196.8±113.2. The non-operative time, e.g., between the arrival of the patient and the onset of anesthesia was 14.3±17.3 minutes. The time to set the next patient in operating room was 119.8±79.6 minutes. Our total non-operative time was 155 minutes. Conclusion Delays frequently occurred in our operating room and had a major effect on patient flow and resource utilization. The non-operative time was longer than the operative time. It is possible to increase the operating room capacity by management and training of the professionals involved. The indicators provided a tool to improve operating room efficiency.

scholarly journals Differences in Surgical Outcome in Near Total Thyroidectomy for Benign Nodular Goiter: A Comparison of LigaSure Vessel Sealer versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Shiraz Shaikh ◽  
Champa Sushel ◽  
Ahsan Ali Laghari ◽  
Qamber Ali Laghari ◽  
Zameer Hussain Laghari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Calcium Level ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Nodular Goiter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Objective: To compare the efficacy of LigaSure Vessel Sealer in Near Total Thyroidectomy versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique in terms of bleeding, operative time and postoperative drainage. Methodology: This comparative cross sectional study was conducted at Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. Study duration was one year from November 2019 to October 2020. All patients of any age with benign multinodular goiter and either of gender were included. The study subjects were grouped into two categories by randomization (odd / even). The odd numbers were given to patients operated for ligasure and even numbers were given to patients operated with conventional clamp knot tie technique.  Outcomes were observed with respect to post-operative calcium level, intra-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain & post-operative hospital stay. All the data was recorded via study proforma. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20. Results: Total 55 patients were observed. Mean age was 33.25±10.60 years in clamp knot tie procedure group and 35.16±07.96 years in ligasure technique group; without significant difference (p-0.448). Pre and post-operative calcium levels were statistically insignificant among both groups (p-0.358 and 0.163), while loss of blood, hospital stay, post-operative pain and operative duration were significantly greater in clamp knot tie technique group in comparison to ligasure technique group (p-<0.001). Conclusion: LigaSure Vessel Sealer is a feasible and reliable surgical technique and significantly more effective as compared to conventional clamp knot tie technique in terms of post-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain and post-operative hospital stay. However, calcium level was statistically insignificant.

scholarly journals Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Epidemiology of Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopy

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 004695802110560
Author(s):  
Krystian Kazubski ◽  
Łukasz Tomczyk ◽  
Piotr Morasiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Orthopedic Patients ◽  
Male To Female

The purpose of our study was to comprehensively assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on knee and shoulder arthroscopy performed in an orthopedic department of a university hospital in Poland. This study compared the data on all shoulder and knee arthroscopy procedures performed in two different periods: The period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland (from March 4, 2020, to October 15, 2020) and the corresponding period prior to the pandemic (March 4, 2019, to October 15, 2019). The study evaluated epidemiological data, demographic data, and hospital stay duration. The total number of arthroscopy procedures conducted in the evaluated period in 2020 was approximately 8.6% higher than that in the corresponding 2019 period. The mean duration of hospital stay for orthopedic patients after their knee or shoulder arthroscopy was 3.1 days in 2020 and 2.8 days in 2019. Our study revealed the mean age of arthroscopy patients during the pandemic to be lower at 48.4 years than the 51.2 years recorded in 2019. The male-to-female ratio was shown to be lower at .85 during the pandemic, having decreased from 1.5 in 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic did not reduce the number of arthroscopy performed at our center, and the mean age of the patients did not change. However, the pandemic had a marked effect on the mean duration of hospital stay and male-to-female ratio.

scholarly journals Erratum to: Duration of Hospital Stay Following Orthognathic Surgery at the Jordan University Hospital

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Fadi Jarab ◽  
Esam Omar ◽  
Ahmed Bhayat ◽  
Samir Mansuri ◽  
Sami Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

scholarly journals Assessment of operative times of multiple surgical specialties in a public university hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altair da Silva Costa Jr
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Public University ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Operating Room Planning ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the indicators duration of anesthesia, operative time and time patients stay in the operating rooms of different surgical specialties at a public university hospital. Methods It was done by a descriptive cross-sectional study based on the operating room database. The following stages were measured: duration of anesthesia, procedure time and patient length of stay in the room of the various specialties. We included surgeries carried out in sequence in the same room, between 7:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., either elective or emergency. We calculated the 80th percentile of the stages, where 80% of procedures were below this value. Results The study measured 8,337 operations of 12 surgical specialties performed within one year. The overall mean duration of anesthesia of all specialties was 178.12±110.46 minutes, and the 80th percentile was 252 minutes. The mean operative time was 130.45±97.23 minutes, and the 80th percentile was 195 minutes. The mean total time of the patient in the operating room was 197.30±113.71 minutes, and the 80th percentile was 285 minutes. Thus, the variation of the overall mean compared to the 80th percentile was 41% for anesthesia, 49% for surgeries and 44% for operating room time. In average, anesthesia took up 88% of the operating room period, and surgery, 61%. Conclusion This study identified patterns in the duration of surgery stages. The mean values of the specialties can assist with operating room planning and reduce delays.

scholarly journals Duration of Hospital Stay Following Orthognathic Surgery at the Jordan University Hospital

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi Jarab ◽  
Esam Omar ◽  
Ahmed Bhayat ◽  
Samir Mansuri ◽  
Sami Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

scholarly journals Clinical outcome of appendectomy: laparoscopic vs open technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Jan M. Rather ◽  
Sobia Manzoor ◽  
Mubashir Shah
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Open Technique ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency. Appendectomy has been proven to be the standard care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcome and complication rates.Methods: This was a single centric, retrospective study conducted at SKIMS, Soura from May 2018 to April 2021. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy patients were compared in terms of operative times, conversion rate, complication rates and duration of hospital stay.Results: Total 120 patients were included in this study with 40 in laparoscopic group while 80 patients in the open group. Increased operative time in laparoscopic group (p=0.033) and longer duration of hospital stay (p=0.021) with open group while as comparable complication rate in both procedures were observed. Higher rates of intra-abdominal collection in laparoscopic group as compared to open groupConclusions: Both laparoscopic and open appendectomy procedures can be performed routinely for acute appendicitis without the additional risks of complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document