scholarly journals Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zinat Ghanbari ◽  
Saloumeh Peivandi ◽  
Maryam Deldar Pasikhani ◽  
Foroohar Darabi
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification ◽  
Iranian Women ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Cross Sectional

BACKGROUND፡ Pelvic organ prolapse is a common pelvic disorder among women. A standard staging system is needed to carefully evaluate the extent and severity of the disease, and initiate appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods of standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse.METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted on all women with complaints of seeing or feeling a vaginal lump or bulge and/or a dragging sensation who were presented to a pelvic floor disorders clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from October 2018 to June 2019. All patients were evaluated in terms of pelvic organ prolapse severity and staging using both instruments. Also, length of time needed to complete the questionnaires were calculated. After data collection, the results of pelvic organ prolapse staging and degree of agreement between two examiners were evaluated.RESULTS: A total of 120 women with mean age of 50.92±13.12 years were evaluated. It was shown that there is an almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient > 0.8) between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in all the 3 compartments. Also, there was almost a twofold increase in the time needed to perform standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification (4.16±1.01 minutes) compared to performing simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (2.12±1.14 minutes) (p=0.03).CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, there is a substantial and almost perfect agreement between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. It seems that using simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system is more applicable in clinical practice for staging of pelvic organ prolapse, with high reliability coefficient. 

scholarly journals Elastin Expression in Sacrouterina Ligament is Weaker in the Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Hasnawati
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Uterosacral Ligaments ◽  
The Cross

Objective: The research aims at comparing the elastin immunolabeling in the uterosacral ligaments in women with pelvic organ prolapse and without pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: The research is done at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and education networking some hospitals the Obstetrics and Gynecological School of Medicine Hasanuddin University that began in January 2011 until April 2012. This research assessing expression of elastin on 35 women with a pop level III and IV and as control is 35 women without POP. Immunolabeling of elastin valued in staining checkings immunohistokimia uses antibodies elastin ( clone no. Ba-4 1:1600; Novacastra Laboratories Ltd, UK). The research was carried out by the cross sectional study. Mixed with chi-square. Level significance used is 0.05. Results: The results showed that the elastin immunolabeling in women with POP is decline on most sample expression with the intensity of elastin is weak (74.3%). The most control with the intensity of elastin immunolabeling is moderate (48.6%). Elastin immunolabeling seem significant in women with menopause and with BMI that overweight (all with p

scholarly journals Symptoms of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse and physical performance in middle-aged women from Northeast Brazil: a cross-sectional study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Carmem Apolinário Vieira ◽  
Saionara Maria Aires da Câmara ◽  
Mayle Andrade Moreira ◽  
Catherine McLean Pirkle ◽  
Afshin Vafaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Northeast Brazil ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Cross Sectional

Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Woodman ◽  
Steven E. Swift ◽  
Amy L. O’Boyle ◽  
Michael T. Valley ◽  
Deirdre R. Bland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Job Description

scholarly journals Perineal Body Length and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Menopausal Women

2019 ◽  
pp. 193-195
Author(s):  
Chairun Nisa ◽  
David Lotisna ◽  
Deviana Soraya Riu ◽  
St. Maisuri T Chalid
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Body Length ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Perineal Body ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Genital Hiatus ◽  
Vaginal Length ◽  
Menopausal Women ◽  
Total Vaginal Length

Abstract Objective: To determine the correlation between the perineal body length and the pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in menopausal women. Methods: The total vaginal length (TVL), genital hiatus (GH), and perineal body (PB) length as the POP-Q component were measured at 60 menopausal women enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Results: Menopausal women with POP have the shorter perineal body (63.3%; <3 cm) compared with menopausal women without POP (36.7%; ≥3 cm). The mean length of the perineal body in menopausal women who suffer POP 2.81 ± 0.26 cm while in women without POP is 3.23±0.17 cm. POP risk was 25 times in menopausal women with a perineal body length <3 cm compared with longer perineal body (p = 0.01; OR = 25.4; 95% CI 3.1-209.1).Conclusion: Perineal body length is a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse in menopausal women.Keywords: perineal body, prolapse, pelvic organ prolapsed Abstrak Tujuan: Menentukan korelasi panjang perineal body dengan kejadian prolaps organ panggul (POP) pada perempuan menopause. Metode: Pengukuran komponen POP-Q meliputi total vaginal length (TVL), genital hiatus (GH), dan panjang perineal body (PB) dilakukan pada 60 perempuan menopause yang dilibatkan dalam penelitian potong lintang. Hasil:    Perempuan menopause dengan POP memiliki perineal body yang lebih pendek (63,3%; <3 cm) dibandingkan dengan perempuan menopause tanpa POP (36,7%; ≥3 cm). Panjang rata-rata perineal body pada perempuan menopasue yang menderita POP 2,81 ± 0,26 cm sedangkan pada perempuan tanpa POP adalah 3,23 ± 0,17 cm. Risiko POP 25 kali pada perempuan menopause dengan panjang perineal body <3 cm dibandingkan dengan tubuh perineum yang lebih panjang (p = 0,01; OR = 25,4; 95% CI 3,1-209,1). Kesimpulan: Panjang perineal body merupakan faktor risiko prolaps organ panggul pada perempuan menopause. Kata kunci : perineal body, prolapsed, prolaps organ panggul

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document