scholarly journals Awareness, attitudes and knowledge of evidence-based medicine: A cross-sectional baseline survey among academic healthcare practitioners in Namibia

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Abdulwadud ◽  
Sailas Nyareza ◽  
Peter Nyarango ◽  
Sylvester Moyo
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Attitudes And Knowledge ◽  
Based Medicine

scholarly journals Knowledge, attitude and practice of evidence-based medicine among primary care practitioners in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044372
Author(s):  
Mat Nawi Zanaridah ◽  
Mohd Noor Norhayati ◽  
Zakaria Rosnani
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Primary Care Practitioner ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners ◽  
Based Medicine

ObjectivesTo determine the level of knowledge and practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and the attitudes towards it and to identify the factors associated with its practice among primary care practitioners in Selangor, Malaysia.SettingThis cross-sectional study was conducted in randomly selected health clinics in Selangor. Data were collected from primary care physicians using self-administered questionnaires on knowledge, practice and attitudes regarding EBM.ParticipantsThe study included 225 respondents working in either government or private clinics. It excluded house officers and those working in public and private universities or who were retired from practice.ResultsA total of 32.9% had a high level of EBM knowledge, 12% had a positive attitude towards EBM and 0.4% had a good level of its practice. The factors significantly associated with EBM practice were ethnicity, attitude, length of work experience as a primary care practitioner and quick access to online reference applications on mobile phones.ConclusionsAlthough many physicians have suboptimal knowledge of EBM and low levels of practising it, majority of them have a neutral attitude towards EBM practice. Extensive experience as a primary care practitioner, quick access to online references on a mobile phone and good attitude towards EBM were associated with its practice.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Noor Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire: A cross-sectional study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0249660
Author(s):  
Mohd Noor Norhayati ◽  
Zanaridah Mat Nawi
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Based Medicine

Background Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a widely accepted scientific advancement in clinical settings that helps achieve better, safer, and more cost-effective healthcare. However, presently, validated instruments to evaluate healthcare professionals’ attitude and practices toward implementing EBM are not widely available. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of a newly developed knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire on EBM for use among healthcare professionals. Methods The Noor Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire was tested among physicians in a government hospital between July and August 2018. Exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability-based Cronbach’s alpha statistic were conducted. Results The questionnaire was distributed among 94 physicians, and 90 responded (response rate of 95.7%). The initial number of items in the KAP domains of the Noor Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire were 15, 17, and 13, respectively; however, two items in the practice domain with communalities <0.25 and factor loadings <0.4 were removed. The factor structure accounted for 52.33%, 66.29%, and 55.39% of data variance in the KAP domains, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.81, 0.81, and 0.84 for KAP domains, respectively, indicating high reliability. Conclusions This questionnaire can be used to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of healthcare professionals toward EBM. Future testing of this questionnaire among other medical personnel groups will help expand the scope of this tool.

scholarly journals Supporting general adult psychiatry higher trainees to develop research competencies: a training improvement project

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S131-S132
Author(s):  
Annalie Clark ◽  
John Stevens ◽  
Sarah Abd El Sayed
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
North West ◽  
The North ◽  
Research Competencies ◽  
Adult Psychiatry ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Training Opportunities ◽  
Research Studies

AimsEvidence shows that research-active trusts have better clinical patient outcomes. Psychiatric trainees are required to develop knowledge and skills in research techniques and critical appraisal to enable them to practice evidence-based medicine and be research-active clinicians. This project aimed to evaluate and improve the support for developing research competencies available to general adult psychiatry higher trainees (HT) in the North-West of England.MethodGeneral Adult HT in the North–West of England completed a baseline survey in November 2019 to ascertain trainee's experience of research training provision. The following interventions were implemented to address this feedback:A trainee research handbook was produced, containing exemplar activies for developing research competencies and available training opportunities, supervisors and active research studies.The trainee research representative circulated research and training opportunities between November 2019 – August 2020.Research representatives held a trainee Question and Answer session in September 2020.All General Adult HT were asked to complete an electronic survey in November 2020 to evaluate the effect of these interventions.Result18 General Adult HT completed the baseline survey in November 2019. 29.4% of trainees thought they received enough information on research competencies and 88.9% wanted more written guidance. 38.9% of trainees knew who to contact about research within their NHS Trust and 33.3% were aware of current research studies. Identified challenges for meeting research competencies included lack of time, difficulty identifying a mentor and topic and accessibility of projects.20 General Adult HT completed the repeat survey in November 2020. 50% of trainees wanted to be actively involved in research and 35% wanted to develop evidence-based medicine skills. A minority of trainees aimed to complete only the minimum ARCP requirements. All trainees thought the handbook was a useful resource for meeting research competencies and would recommend it to other trainees. In trainees who received the handbook, 94.7% thought they had received adequate support on meeting research competencies and 94.7% knew who to contact about research in their trust. 68.4% of trainees would like further written guidance on meeting research competencies. Trainees highlighted ongoing practical difficulties with engaging with research and concern about lacking required skills for research.ConclusionTrainees are motivated to engage with research on various different levels, not purely for ARCP purposes. Simple interventions can help trainees feel adequately supported with meeting research competencies. Further work to support trainee involvement in research and improve trainee confidence in engaging with research is required.

scholarly journals Awareness and use of evidence-based medicine information among patients in Croatia: a nation-wide cross-sectional study

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijel Nejašmić ◽  
Ivana Miošić ◽  
Davorka Vrdoljak ◽  
Snježana Permozer Hajdarović ◽  
Marion Tomičić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Medicine Information ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Wide Cross ◽  
Based Medicine

Evidence-based medicine use in pharmacy practice: a cross-sectional survey

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 786-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Abu Farha ◽  
Eman Alefishat ◽  
Maysa Suyagh ◽  
Eman Elayeh ◽  
Amal Mayyas
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Medicine Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Based Medicine

scholarly journals Awareness and the use of evidence-based medicine resources among physicians

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 4612-4614
Author(s):  
Amjad Alhelo ◽  
Bashar Samara
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Evidenced Based ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Based Medicine

Aim: to evaluate awareness and the use of evidence-based medicine resources among physicians in Jordan.  Method: A cross-sectional study by internet was performed among 517 doctors who were responsive from a total of 717 doctors, a total of 72.1% response rate. Doctors from all specialties were contacted from a Facebook group called doctors café in Jordan. A questionnaire was given to each one of them to measure their awareness and use of Evidence based database.   Result: From 517 physicians 377 they are using evidenced based resources frequently, and 91 using resources but not frequently and 49 not using evidence-based resources. The resource that was mostly used by the doctors was PubMed, followed by other resources such as Up to date, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Medscape, BMJ best practice, e-books and other online journals for published papers. The Cochrane Library was surprisingly not so familiar amongst physicians. Conclusion: There is good awareness about EBM among physicians in Jordan, and that benefits health care in Jordan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document