Impact of Teacher Professional Development in Handwriting on Improved Student Learning Outcomes in Writing Quality

2012 ◽  
pp. 229-244
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teacher Professional Development ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Teacher Professional ◽  
Improved Student Learning

Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 642-680
Author(s):  
Gaowei Chen ◽  
Carol K. K. Chan ◽  
Kennedy K. H. Chan ◽  
Sherice N. Clarke ◽  
Lauren B. Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Teacher Professional Development ◽  
Classroom Discourse ◽  
Teacher Professional

Supporting Teacher Learning: Improving Mathematics Instruction through Classroom-Based Inquiry

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-186
Author(s):  
Caroline Brayer Ebby ◽  
Maria Palaitis Ottinger ◽  
Penny Silver
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Teacher Learning ◽  
Teacher Professional Development ◽  
Mathematics Instruction ◽  
Learning To Teach ◽  
Mathematical Content ◽  
Beliefs And Practice ◽  
Teacher Professional ◽  
Teacher's Knowledge

Research has shown that learning to teach mathematics for understanding is not simply a matter of learning new pedagogical techniques but rather requires substantial changes in a teacher's knowledge, beliefs, and practice (Putnam and Borko 2000). Preparing teachers to implement reform-oriented curricula requires positioning them as learners and inquirers of mathematical content, student learning, and instructional practice. Ball (1996) asserts that teacher professional development must embrace the uncertainty of practice and reflect a “stance of critique and inquiry—a stance of asking and debating, a discourse of conjecture and deliberation” (p. 506).

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAINTIFIK PADA KURIKULUM 2013 DAN KOMPETENSI PROFESIONAL GURU TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII DI MTSN 2 BOGOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-129
Author(s):  
Lisnamayanti Lisnamayanti ◽  
Imam Tholkhah ◽  
Amie Primarni
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Teacher Competence ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Teacher Professional ◽  
Scientific Learning

  ABSTRACT This study discusses "The Effect of the Scientific Learning Model on the 2013 Curriculum and Teacher Professional Competence on Student Learning Outcomes of Class VIII at MTsN Bogor. The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is a significant influence between the Scientific Learning Model in the 2013 curriculum and Teacher Competence Against Results Learning grade VIII students of MTsN 2 Bogor. This study uses a Quantitative Method in which the researcher processes the data with questionnaire distribution questionnaire technique with a Likert scale of variables X 1 (Scientific learning model in the 2013 curriculum) and X2 (Teacher Professional Competence) and Y (Student Learning Outcomes of Class VIII) given to students from the population of students in class VIII a total of 380, then a sample of 15% was taken in a total of 60 students. From the results of this study the significant value of the effect of X1 on Y is 0.996> 0.05 and the count-0.005 <ttable2.00247, so it can be stated that the scientific learning model in the 2013 curriculum (X1) can be accepted in other words there is the influence of the scientific learning model in the 2013 curriculum on the learning outcomes of students of class VIII at MTsN 2 Bogor. While the significant value of X2 against Y with a value of 0.162> 0.05 and the value of 1.415 <ttable2.00247, it can be concluded that X2 is accepted in other words there is no effect of teacher professional competence on student learning outcomes at MTsN 2 Bogor. That the significant value for the effect of X1 and X2 simultaneously on Y is 0.291 <0.05 and the value of Fcount is 1.263 <Ftable 3.16 so that it can be stated that X1 and X2 have no effect on Y. Significant value for the influence of X1 and X2 simultaneously to Y is 0.291> 0.05 and the value of Fcount is 1.263 <Ftable 3.16 so that it can be stated that X1 and X2 have an influence on Y. In the coefficient of determination the R square value of 0.42 this implies that the influence of variables X1 and X2 on Y by 42%. Keywords: learning model, curriculum, teacher competency, students

Faculty and Career Advising

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Vespia ◽  
Stephanie D. Freis ◽  
Rebecca M. Arrowood
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Career Development ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Major Selection ◽  
Faculty Advisors ◽  
Career Advising

Psychology prioritizes students’ professional or career development by including it as one of the five undergraduate learning goals. Faculty advisors are critical to that development but likely feel less prepared for the role. Departments face challenges assessing associated student learning outcomes. We introduce an instrument programs can use to evaluate outcomes and advisors can use to measure students’ advising needs, perceptions, and preferences. We share results from an undergraduate sample ( N = 91) to illustrate potential data and uses. For example, these students viewed faculty as knowledgeable career advisors and expressed confidence in their major selection but simultaneously reported feeling unprepared for postgraduation life and thought the major was not highly marketable. We offer specific recommendations for using such data to promote professional development.

scholarly journals The Effect of Various Learning Approaches on Mathematical Learning Outcomes based on the Multiple Intelligences of Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-228
Author(s):  
Yerizon Yerizon ◽  
Atus Amadi Putra
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Multiple Intelligences ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Team Games ◽  
Improved Student Learning

The aim of this paper is to describe the research results on multiple intelligences in mathematics learning, using a descriptive approach. It also ascertains the influence of various learning models on mathematics learning outcomes based on students’ multiple intelligences. Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Team Games Tournament (TGT) learning models improved learning outcomes for students possessing logical-mathematical, kinesthetic, and interpersonal intelligences. Furthermore, Group Investigation (GI) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models improved student learning outcomes with logical-mathematical intelligence. Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model with peer tutors improved student learning outcomes with linguistic, logical-mathematical, and interpersonal intelligences. Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and Jigsaw learning improved student learning outcomes with linguistic intelligence. Also, TSTS and NHT learning models improved student learning outcomes with logical-mathematical, and interpersonal intelligences. Keywords: compound intelligence, learning model, mathematics

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document