Faculty and Career Advising

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Vespia ◽  
Stephanie D. Freis ◽  
Rebecca M. Arrowood

Psychology prioritizes students’ professional or career development by including it as one of the five undergraduate learning goals. Faculty advisors are critical to that development but likely feel less prepared for the role. Departments face challenges assessing associated student learning outcomes. We introduce an instrument programs can use to evaluate outcomes and advisors can use to measure students’ advising needs, perceptions, and preferences. We share results from an undergraduate sample ( N = 91) to illustrate potential data and uses. For example, these students viewed faculty as knowledgeable career advisors and expressed confidence in their major selection but simultaneously reported feeling unprepared for postgraduation life and thought the major was not highly marketable. We offer specific recommendations for using such data to promote professional development.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 468
Author(s):  
Kamaluddin Kamaluddin ◽  
Bambang Soebali ◽  
Soeparman Kardi

This research intents on developing learning Package with 5E model on heat to improve student learning outcomes. The research was conducted in two phases. The first phase was developing learning instrument by adapting the model of Dick & Carey. It included analyzing the basic competencies, analyzing concepts, analyzing students, formulating learning goals, developing instruments, developing learning strategies, and compiling learning Package. The second phase was testing the instruments on 10 students of SMPN 1 Dukun Gresik. The draft of implementation in the classroom used pretest and posttest design and descriptive qualitative data analysis. Based on the result of data analysis, the research showed that learning instrument that was developed had average score of validation categorized as good. The description of the result on feasibility of lesson plans categorized as good overall. The outcomes of students’ cognitive after given 5E model of learning showed that all students competent, As well as students' motivation for followed 5E model of learning is high. In conclusion, the learning instrument of science with 5E model is decent used to improve student learning outcomes. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran dengan model 5E pada materi kalor untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Penelitian dilakukan dalam 2 tahap, yaitu tahap pertama mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran dengan mengadaptasi model Dick & Carey  antara lain menganalisis kompetensi dasar, menganalisis konsep, menganalisis siswa, merumuskan tujuan pembelajaran, mengembangkan instrumen, mengembangkan strategi pembelajaran, serta menyusun perangkat pembelajaran. Tahap kedua mengujicobakan perangkat pembelajaran pada 10 siswa SMPN 1 Dukun Gresik. Rancangan implementasi di kelas menggunakan desain pretest dan posttest serta analisis data secara deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran dan instrumen pembelajaran yang dikembangkan memiliki rata-rata skor validasi berkatagori baik. Deskripsi hasil penelitian keterlaksanaan RPP secara keseluruhan berkatagori baik. Hasil belajar kognitif siswa setelah diberikan pembelajaran dengan model 5E menunjukkan bahwa semua siswa tuntas. Serta motivasi belajar siswa selama mengikuti pembelajaran model 5E ditagorikan tinggi. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah perangkat pembelajaran dengan Model 5E layak digunakan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa.


Author(s):  
Anisa Farida ◽  
Nadia Rizky Harisuna ◽  
Septianna Nurida

The purpose of this writing is to provide innovation in learning in the classroom by using varied learning models. So that the quality of learning in the classroom increases and is more interesting. In addition, it can also improve student activity, foster a spirit of learning and completing tasks well. The problem of learning in Indonesia is a problem that must be taken seriously, especially by the teacher. Therefore, teachers must be able to inspire students to be actively involved in the learning process of selection and determination of learning strategies that are most appropriate to the characteristics of students. With the existence of this writing, the background of the difficulties in understanding the material is also the lack of enthusiasm of students in learning the material and completing the assignments given by the teacher which have an impact on student learning outcomes that are still low. The low student learning outcomes, of course, many factors that cause, for example the classic problem about the application of learning methods that are still teacher-centered, so students tend to passively listen to the teacher's explanation. So, the choice of methods and strategies in teaching and learning in class is very important because it can affect the results of teaching and learning in the classroom and obtain the desired learning goals. For this reason, the teacher can use the Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) learning method which is modified by the task strategy and force. The learning model of Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) is a method that is focused on providing direct and enjoyable learning experiences. Experience learning directly by learning to listen or listen (auditory), learn intellectually and learn with repetition. Meanwhile, the Task and Forces strategy is a learning strategy that has little effect on students to complete tasks until they are completed and on time. If it does not complete the assignment given by the teacher, then there is a penalty for students who do not do their duties according to the previous agreement. So that students will be motivated in listening, understanding the material conveyed by the teacher and doing the task on time. This strategy can also improve the quality of student learning to reduce the level of student laziness and provide good learning outcomes. By combining this method it is hoped that it can make students become more disciplined and responsible for the tasks given. Therefore, combining these models and strategies is needed in the learning process so that the learning process is interesting and the quality of learning increases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 1015-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita M. Schuchardt ◽  
Miray Tekkumru-Kisa ◽  
Christian D. Schunn ◽  
Mary Kay Stein ◽  
Birdy Reynolds

Biosfer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Diana Vivanti Sigit ◽  
I Made Putrawan ◽  
Claudia Sulfitania

Learning is closely associated in determining student learning outcomes. In the process of teaching and learning, teachers have an important role in the achievement of learning goals. One indicator of achievement learning goals can be seen from the results of student learning outcomes. Teachers belonging to the environmental conditions or climate. Student’s perceptions of classroom climate greatly affect student learning outcomes. The purpose of this research was to determine differences in biology of learning outcomes based on student’s perceptions of classroom climate (Classroom Environment Scale/CES). This research was held in 1 High School Jakarta on April-May 2016. This type of research was quantitative with ex post facto method through comparative studies. The subjects of research were students of class X IPA with a total sample of 54 students were selected by Simple Random Sampling. Data collection techniques by using achievement test biological and Classroom Environment Scale (CES). The analysis prerequisite test was used the test for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity test with F-test. Based on the calculations, data were normally distributed and homogeneous. Hypothesis testing was done through t-test. The results of the t-test for biology learning outcomes shows that there was differences between biology learning outcomes both positive and negative student’s perceptions of classroom climate (Classroom Environment Scale/CES).


Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Hidayat Hidayat ◽  
Harun Sitompul

This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 472
Author(s):  
Aslinda Aslinda

This study aims to describe learning outcomes through the application of PAKEM learning model. The subjects of the study were the students of grade IVb SD Negeri 013 Mekarsari. Improvement of learning outcomes in terms of four categories, namely the ability to absorb, the effectiveness of learning, mastery of student learning both mastery of individual and classical completeness and mastery of learning outcomes. Instruments used for data collection are oral tests and written tests in the form of LKS conducted after the learning process. The results showed that the percentage of student completeness increased from 19.40% to 55.40% categorized well, the effectiveness of learning is categorized very effective with an average of 88.46%. While the completeness of student learning outcomes expressed. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the application of PAKEM learning model can improve learning outcomes on the material of the students of class IV B grade SD Negeri 013 Mekarsari.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
Retno Ambarwati

The background of this study is the low grade science students learning outcomes VI C SDN 004 Tembilahan Kota, Of the 23 students, only 9 students (39.13%) were completed. Based on this the researchers conducted the study by applying image media to improve learning outcomes IPA. This research is a class act who performed a total of two cycles consisting of two meetings, the study was conducted with four phases, namely planning, implementation stage, the stage of observation and reflection stages. The study states that science learning outcomes of students has increased in each cycle, this is evidenced by the increasing average student learning outcomes, the preliminary data the average student learning outcomes at 66.00 has increased in the first cycle of up to 83.30, and increased up to 91.74. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the application of drawing media can improve learning outcomes VI grade science students SDN 004 Tembilahan Kota.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document