Personal performance

2010 ◽  
pp. 137-153
Author(s):  
Deirdre Heddon
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Sri Wartini

<p><em>The purpose of this research </em><em>is </em><em>to explain influence</em><em> of</em><em> </em><em>conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy </em><em>on teamwork</em><em> performance</em><em>. This kind of</em><em> conflict can happen to everyone and</em><em> in any places disregarding</em><em> status, income and position. Someone who ca</em><em>n not</em><em> manage conflict</em><em>s</em><em> will </em><em>have a</em><em> threat</em><em> for his</em><em> personal performance</em><em>,</em><em> and </em><em>unfortunately, </em><em>company’s performance will </em><em>also gain</em><em> the effect. </em><em>Accordingly</em><em>, we need a strategy to manage  conflict</em><em>s</em><em> as a</em><em>n</em><em> effort to create a good performance </em><em>for</em><em> individual employee performance a</em><em>s well as tha</em><em> team performance. </em><em>The p</em><em>opulation af this research is</em><em> the</em><em> entire educational employee</em><em>s</em><em> in UNNES by taking some samples using propotional sampling </em><em>to </em><em>around 88 samples</em><em>. </em><em>The result of this research  prove</em><em>s</em><em> that hypothesis stat</em><em>ing</em><em> “conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy” influenced positively and significantly </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>teamwork performance</em><em> is accepted. This</em><em> explain</em><em>s that </em><em>conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy can give contribution to</em><em> the</em><em> teamwork performance through employee’s </em><em>ability</em><em> to accomodate ideas from partner</em><em>s</em><em> of work, avoid </em><em>disputes</em><em> by respect</em><em>ing</em><em> each other, </em><em>maintaining</em><em> communicati</em><em>on</em><em> and </em><em>conduct</em><em> colaboration </em><em>on</em><em> work</em><em>ing</em><em> method</em><em>s</em><em>. </em><em>It is s</em><em>uggest</em><em>ed</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> this research should improve strateg</em><em>ies</em><em> in managing conflict</em><em>s</em><em> such as strat</em><em>egies</em><em> to compete </em><em>at</em><em> work by giving chance to other partner to use theirs skill in making decision and finding solution to solve the job.</em></p><em>Keywords: conflict management strategy, teamwork’s performance, educational employee</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Karaki ◽  
Rafic Younes ◽  
Francois Trochu ◽  
Pascal Lafon

A great amount of attention has been given to the evaluation of the permeability tensor and several methods have been implemented for this purpose: experimental methods, as well as numerical and analytical methods. Numerical simulation tools are being seriously developed to cover the evaluation of permeability. However, the results are still far from matching reality. On the other hand, many problems still intervene in the experimental measurement of permeability, since it depends on several parameters including personal performance, preparation of specimens, equipment accuracy, and measurement techniques. Errors encountered in these parameters may explain why inconsistent measurements are obtained which result in unreliable experimental evaluation of permeability. However, good progress was done in the second international Benchmark, wherein a method to measure the in-plane permeability was agreed on by 12 institutes and universities. Critical researchers’ work was done in the field of analytical methods, and thus different empirical and analytical models have emerged, but most of those models need to be improved. Some of which are based on Cozeny-Karman equation. Others depend on numerical simulation or experiment to predict the macroscopic permeability. Also, the modeling of permeability of unidirectional fiber beds have taken the greater load of concern, whereas that of fiber bundle permeability prediction remain limited. This paper presents a review on available methods for evaluating unidirectional fiber bundles and engineering fabric permeability. The progress of each method is shown in order to clear things up.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Dunlop ◽  
Daniel J. Beatty ◽  
Mark R. Beauchamp

This research examined the relative effects of other-efficacy and self-efficacy beliefs in relation to individual performance within a cooperative dyadic setting. Pairs of female participants (Mage = 20.08, SD = 1.93) performed three practice trials on a dyadic dance-based videogame. Other-efficacy and self-efficacy beliefs were then manipulated through the provision of bogus feedback regarding each pair member's coordination abilities. Following the administration of this feedback, pairs performed a final trial on this dance-based task. The results revealed a main effect for other-efficacy, such that participants in the enhanced other-efficacy conditions outperformed those in the inhibited other-efficacy conditions on this task. A main effect for self-efficacy was not observed. Furthermore, there was no evidence of an interaction between other-efficacy and self-efficacy. The results of this study suggest that other-efficacy may supersede the effects of self-efficacy in supporting personal performance within cooperative relational contexts.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Naser Jamal Khdour ◽  
Omar Durrah ◽  
Martin Harris

<p>This study seeks to shed light on the phenomenon of job burnout, and its prevalence amongst the staff and seeks to address the issue of the level of job satisfaction in Jordanian universities, together with the examination of the effect of job burnout on job satisfaction. The study adopted a descriptive analytical approach through a comparative study between public universities and private universities, and used the questionnaire as basic tool for data collection, which was distributed to a sample of (200) members of the administrative staff in Jordanian public and private universities. The study found that the degree of job burnout experienced by the administrative staff in the university sector was more than average, Showed that low personal performance dimension has ranked the first as the most persistent job burnout dimension then physical and emotional exhaustion then negative attitude towards relationships. It observed that the degree of job burnout in public universities was greater than in the private universities. The level of staff job satisfaction in the public universities was less than that observed in private universities. The study showed that no dimension of job morally affects on employees satisfaction in public universities. while only one dimension (low personal achievement) affects employees satisfaction in private universities.</p>


1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Moreland ◽  
Paul D. Sweeney
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Hill ◽  
Joachim Stoeber ◽  
Anna Brown ◽  
Paul R. Appleton

Perfectionism is a personality characteristic that has been found to predict sports performance in athletes. To date, however, research has exclusively examined this relationship at an individual level (i.e., athletes’ perfectionism predicting their personal performance). The current study extends this research to team sports by examining whether, when manifested at the team level, perfectionism predicts team performance. A sample of 231 competitive rowers from 36 boats completed measures of self-oriented, team-oriented, and team-prescribed perfectionism before competing against one another in a 4-day rowing competition. Strong within-boat similarities in the levels of team members’ team-oriented perfectionism supported the existence of collective team-oriented perfectionism at the boat level. Two-level latent growth curve modeling of day-by-day boat performance showed that team-oriented perfectionism positively predicted the position of the boat in midcompetition and the linear improvement in position. The findings suggest that imposing perfectionistic standards on team members may drive teams to greater levels of performance.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-721
Author(s):  
Dudley G. Letbetter

A ten-step approach for developing a comprehensive but concise, design-oriented handbook of human performance is proposed, with emphasis on the first two steps. The ten steps are: 1. Identify and define classes and subclasses of human performance. 2. Develop a concise format for abstracting information for each lowest level subclass. 3. Establish the need for a handbook. 4. Prepare an abstract for each literature source covering a lowest level subclass. 5. Develop a concise format, including design recommendations, for summarizing each lowest level subclass. 6. Prepare a summary, including design recommendations, for each lowest level subclass. 7. Collate summaries and abstracts. 8. Prepare table of contents and index. 9. Publish handbook. 10. Distribute handbook. For Step 1, a functional rather than traditional approach is presented. Classes of human performance are identified and defined in terms of basic functions suitable for all applications. Five major functions are identified, subdivided and defined. The five major functions are: R. Receiving information: Receiving all information, except receiving communicated information, which is a subclass of communicating, the second major function. Receiving information includes perception of all natural-environmental and artificially-displayed information (other than perception of directly - or indirectly - communicated information), and input loading and interacting, which also are considerations in communicating. C. Communicating: All exchanging of information between humans by a system or systems of symbols, signs and/or behavior. Communicating consists of emitting and receiving communicated information: oral or non-oral, direct or indirect, unaided or aided, and voluntary or involuntary. P. Processing information: Operating on and treating received information; basic handling of perceived information. Processing information includes storing and retrieving information (recognizing, recalling, reproducing), acquiring and using concepts (acquiring, symbolizing, defining), altering information (calculating and computing, logical and mathematical transforming, encoding and decoding), reasoning (intuiting, inductive and deductive explicit reasoning), imagining (anticipatory, creative, fanciful). M. Managing personal performance: Guiding and directing one's own performance. The “executive” function, which is concerned with carrying into effect and integrating the four other major functions. Managing personal performance includes valuing, making decisions, and initiating and sustaining personal performance. A. Acting: Carrying into effect; changing system physical states. The fifth major function covers producing physical effects. The means is exerting force within oneself and/or on other objects; the direct or indirect result or output is work. Acting includes direct acting (e.g., manually lifting an object) and indirect acting (e.g., operating the controls of an overhead crane lifting an object).


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Karr-Wisniewski ◽  
Ying Lu

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe White

Performance management is tied to external forces and stakeholders whose assessment of performance is more focused on societal outcomes than purely financial outcomes. Government, corporate, and even personal performance measurement should take into account societal indicators that link these disparate yet intertwined spheres of influence. New initiatives in both government and commercial sectors are bringing greater understanding of how societal indicators can measure performance. This paper highlights how societal indicators are used to measure performance in corporate and government sectors. Corporate societal indicators are explored primarily though literary research. Government societal indicators are explored through an examination of the EPA and Superfund program. The paper demonstrates that there is synergy between corporate, government, and personal government performance measures and how business intelligence tools are making these relationships more transparent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document