Measurement and Validity in the Context of Mathematics Coaches

Author(s):  
Kristin E. Harbour ◽  
Stefanie D. Livers ◽  
Margret A. Hjalmarson
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Harbour ◽  
Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides

To support continuous professional development model in the teaching and learning of mathematics, many districts and schools have begun hiring elementary mathematics coaches and/or specialists (MCSs). However, limited large-scale empirical research exists that determines how the use of MCSs affect student learning and achievement. Kristin E. Harbour and Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides begin to fill in this gap by using data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress to explore the relationship between the presence and responsibilities of elementary MCSs and 4th-grade student achievement in mathematics. Based on their findings, they share practical implications for districts and administrators to consider.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Baker ◽  
Melinda Knapp

More than ever, mathematics coaches are being called on to support teachers in developing effective classroom practices. Coaching that influences professional growth of teachers is best accomplished when mathematics coaches are supported to develop knowledge related to the work of coaching. This article details the implementation of the Decision-Making Protocol for Mathematics Coaching (DMPMC) across 3 cases. The DMPMC is a framework that brings together potentially productive coaching activities (Gibbons & Cobb, 2017) and the research-based Mathematics Teaching Practices (MTPs) in Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All (NCTM, 2014) and aims to support mathematics coaches to purposefully plan coaching interactions. The findings suggest the DMPMC supported mathematics coaches as they worked with classroom teachers while also providing much-needed professional development that enhanced their coaching practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-5
Author(s):  
Glendon W. Blume

Because JRME is a research journal, its value to those who conduct research in mathematics education is obvious. What may not be as obvious, however, is that JRME articles also have the potential to benefit another audience, namely, mathematics education practitioners. Research articles in JRME (and those in other mathematics education research journals, as well) can offer to practitioners helpful information and a variety of tools that have the potential to be useful in their work. The variety of “practitioners” who can benefit from research articles in JRME includes those who teach mathematics at the prekindergarten through collegiate levels, teacher educators who work with prospective mathematics teachers at any of those levels, mathematics coaches or supervisors who serve as school- or district-based leaders for groups of mathematics teachers, teacher educators who engage in-service mathematics teachers in professional development, and even researchers who teach others about mathematics education research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia F. Campbell ◽  
Nathaniel N. Malkus

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Maher ◽  
Elizabeth B. Uptegrove

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. em0640
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Harbour ◽  
Evthokia S. Saclarides ◽  
Jill L. Adelson ◽  
Karen S. Karp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document