The problem of the law governing the arbitration clause between national rules and transnational solutions

In matters that are subject to the CMR Convention, under the rule of Art. 33 of this Convention, the arbitration court is obliged, first, to apply the CMR Convention and it is not permissible to apply, in place of the scope of the CMR Convention, another legal order or extra-legal principles. Secondly, as far as it results from the CMR Convention, the arbitration court should apply the applicable national law. Thirdly, the arbitration court settles the dispute according to the law applicable to a given relationship, and when the parties have expressly authorized it – in compliance with general principles of law or principles of equity. Fourthly, the arbitral tribunal takes into consideration the provisions of the contract and the established habits applicable to the given legal relationship. The arbitration agreement regarding the dispute subject to the CMR Convention will therefore be of a complex nature due to the requirement of Art. 33 of the CMR Convention as to the indication that a uniform law applies in arbitration proceedings – the subject of inter-city agreement. The parties should indicate the following in the content of the arbitration clause: 1) obligatory CMR convention, as required by Art. 33 CMR Convention 2) optional national law to which the CMR Convention refers, and in the absence of such an indication, the arbitration court will apply the law applicable to a given legal relationship, and possibly another national law to which the CMR Convention does not refer, although such a solution would be a source of many complications or general legal principles or rules of equity. For practical reasons, it is worth taking into account other issues, such as the language of the proceedings, in the arbitration clause.

Download Full-text

Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak di Bidang Bisnis melalui Arbitrase

to-ra ◽

10.33541/tora.v2i1.1133 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 305

Author(s):

Nurdin Siregar ◽

Radisman Saragih

Keyword(s):

Everyday Life ◽

The Other ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

The Public ◽

The Core ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

Good For ◽

The Law ◽

Core Issues ◽

Made In

Arbitration is a way of solving civil disputes outside the public courts based the arbitration agreement made in writing by the parties to the dispute. The arbitration agreement is an agreement in the form of the arbitration clause contained in a written agreement made by the parties before a dispute arises or a separate arbitration agreement made by the parties after a dispute arises. In everyday life with various activities of members of today’s society, immense possibility of friction-friction in running business and trade that ended with disputes between members of the public and businesses. In efforts to completion, it would seem that this form of dispute diversity define the core issues then this diversity will be easy settlement with the provisions and rules of law that are sure to be able to look for the solution either arbitration or by mediation, consulting, negotiations, konsialiasi. The arbitration decision will be implemented after the verdict copy officially registered, but the arbitration ruling in accordance with the provisions of the law Arbitration can still be filed annulment if the decision is thought to contain elements, letters or documents are filed in the examination after the verdict recognized dinyataakan counterfeit or fake, after adjudication documents found prescriptive, which is hidden by the other party or the decision taken on the results of a ruse conducted by one of the parties in the dispute. That for legal certainty associated with the judiciary also good for the winning side and the decision is legally binding. Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis melalui arbitrase

Download Full-text

THE EXAMINATION OF COMPETENCE: COMPETENCE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

GÃªnero & Direito ◽

10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n3.47628 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Homayoun Mafi ◽

Mohammad Reza Khademi

Keyword(s):

Competent Authority ◽

Competency Assessment ◽

Arbitral Tribunal ◽

Legal Systems ◽

Commercial Arbitration ◽

International Commercial Arbitration ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

The Law

The arbitration clause implies the agreement of the parties' will to concede (assign) the existing or future dispute into arbitration, thus, in accordance with the law, the inevitable basis is to establish the referee's authority and jurisdiction and the influence of his/her verdict. Therefore, the formation of a court of arbitration and the issuance of a ruling requires that the existence and the validity of the contract of referral the matter to arbitration is acceptable to the parties. Although the parties may find a dispute (difference) in the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, it is also likely that one of the parties denies or invalidates the existence of the arbitration agreement. In such a hypothesis, the formation of an arbitration authority and its review will entail consideration of the dispute before it. For this reason, one of the important issues that may arise in arbitration is the determination of the competent authority dealing with a dispute that may arise between the parties as to the existence or validity of the arbitration convention or jurisdiction. The issue of competency assessment (Competence - Competence), which improves the efficiency of the arbitral institution, can be seen in the most legal systems. Whether the arbitral tribunal has the merit of deciding whether to qualify under the terms of the arbitral agreement is a question that has long been addressed in the arbitration law as the competence to determine jurisdiction

Download Full-text

UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8648 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Rahayu Hartini

Keyword(s):

Legal Issue ◽

Basic Rule ◽

Legal Basis ◽

Legal Argument ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Return Policies ◽

Legal Rules ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

The Law ◽

Legal Guidelines

AbstractThis study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy.Key Words: Bankruptcy, delay debt payment obligations(PKPU), Basis of pacta sunt servanda (PSS)AbstrakPenelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan.Kata kunci: Kepailitan, PKPU Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda (PSS)

Download Full-text

Undue Intrusion on Parties’ Autonomy Finally Amended: An Observation of Article 51 of the Jordanian Arbitration Law

Arab Law Quarterly ◽

10.1163/15730255-12332009 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (2) ◽

pp. 198-208

Author(s):

Ahmed Mohammad Al-Hawamdeh ◽

Ahmad Abed Alla Alhusban

Keyword(s):

Previous Article ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

The Law

Abstract Before its amendment in 2018, Article 51 of the Jordanian Arbitration Law stated that: ‘if the court nullifies the award, consequently it would render the arbitration agreement nullified’. The newly amendment Article 51 of the Jordanian Arbitration Law reads: ‘If the Court of Cassation […] nullifies the award that should not result in nullifying the arbitration clause unless the arbitration agreement is itself void’. Here we argue that the new amendment was long due as the previous Article unduly intruded on parties’ autonomy. This article was originally submitted before the 2018 amendment of the law and the exact wording of what the article originally suggested was adopted by the new law.

Download Full-text

UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v92i0.3812 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 92 ◽

Author(s):

Rahayu Hartini ,

Keyword(s):

Legal Issue ◽

Basic Rule ◽

Legal Basis ◽

Legal Argument ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Return Policies ◽

Legal Rules ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

The Law ◽

Legal Guidelines

<h4>Abstract</h4> This study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy. Key Words: Bankruptcy, delay debt payment obligations(PKPU), Basis of pacta sunt servanda (PSS) <h3>Abstrak</h3> Penelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan. Kata kunci: Kepailitan, PKPU Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda (PSS)

Download Full-text

International Commercial Arbitration and the Possible Application Thereof in Iraq

مجلة العلوم القانونية ◽

10.35246/jols.v30i1.230 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 30 (1) ◽

Author(s):

علي فوزي الموسوي

Keyword(s):

Judicial System ◽

Arbitral Tribunal ◽

Commercial Arbitration ◽

International Commercial Arbitration ◽

Arbitration Clause ◽

International Court ◽

Personal Status ◽

Judicial Action ◽

The Law ◽

Commercial Disputes

International commercial arbitration is a special judicial system based primarily on an agreement, be it an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement (compromise), between parties to a dispute. It is therefore a system aiming at settling commercial disputes by submitting them to a single arbitrator, or an arbitral panel, or an arbitral tribunal (e. g. , the International Court of Arbitration). It is therefore also a means for settling an existing or future dispute that entails refraining from resorting to the competent judiciary. It is also an extra – judicial action aiming at establishing justice between people. The aim of arbitration is to bring justice to parties in conflict, but it is also designed to preserve peace among them, by providing solutions that are deemed satisfactory by each party, and through direct confrontation. It is a technical means for peaceful cooperation between countries with different systems. Resorting to international commercial arbitration is intended to solve a dispute based on a desire for reconciliation, to thereby avoid private retribution, without waiving the protection of the law, although it does entail waiver of state judges’ jurisdiction to rule over the dispute, since the parties choose their own judge. This type of Arbitration is called “international” if it relates to international commercial interests. Arbitration is also used in other areas, e. g. , personal status and tribal arbitration in Iraq. However, our study concentrates on international commercial arbitration and the possible application thereof in Iraq.

Download Full-text

Ethical Challenges: Less About Moral Wrongdoing and More About Communication Breakdown

Perspectives on Gerontology ◽

10.1044/gero20.3.72 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 20 (3) ◽

pp. 72-84 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Paula Leslie ◽

Mary Casper

Keyword(s):

Ethical Challenges ◽

Speech Language Pathology ◽

Thickened Liquids ◽

Communication Breakdown ◽

Professional Duty ◽

Language Pathology ◽

The Law ◽

Personal Case

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.

Download Full-text