scholarly journals UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahayu Hartini
Keyword(s):  
Legal Issue ◽  
Basic Rule ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Argument ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Return Policies ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Guidelines

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>This study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy.</em><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Key Words: </em></strong><em>Bankruptcy, delay debt payment obligations(PKPU), Basis of pacta sunt servanda (PSS)</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan.</p>Kata kunci: Kepailitan, PKPU Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda (PSS)

scholarly journals UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN

2015 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahayu Hartini ,
Keyword(s):  
Legal Issue ◽  
Basic Rule ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Argument ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Return Policies ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Guidelines

<h4>Abstract</h4> <p><em>This study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy.</em><em> </em></p> <p><strong><em>Key Words: </em></strong><em>Bankruptcy, delay debt payment obligations(PKPU), Basis of pacta sunt servanda (PSS)</em><em></em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <h3>Abstrak</h3> <p>Penelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan.</p> <p>Kata kunci: Kepailitan, PKPU  Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda (PSS)</p>

scholarly journals O rozgraniczaniu statutów i wsysaniu regulacji prawnej (na przykładzie prawa stosowanego do oceny różnych aspektów powołania i funkcjonowania wykonawcy testamentu i zarządcy sukcesyjnego przedsiębiorstwem)

2020 ◽  
pp. 159-177
Author(s):  
Maksymilian Pazdan
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Eu Regulation ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Eu

The position of the executor of the will is governed by the law applicable to succession (Article 23(2)(f) of the EU Regulation 650/2012), while the position of the succession administrator of the estate of a business of a physical person located in Poland is subject to the Law of 5 July 2018 on the succession administration of the business of a physical person (the legal basis for such solution is in Article 30 of the EU Regulation 650/2012). However, if the court needs to determine the law applicable to certain aspects of appointing or functioning of these institutions, which have a nature of partial or preliminary questions, these laws will apply, as determined in line with the methods elaborated to deal with partial and preliminary questions in private international law. The rules devoted to the executors of wills are usually not self-standing. In such situations, the legislators most often call for supportive application of the rules designed for other matters existing in the same legal system (here — of the legis successionis). This is referred to as the absorption of the legal rules.

scholarly journals Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Phising Menurut UU ITE

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2525
Author(s):  
Vikran Fasyadhiyaksa Putra Y
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Modus Operandi ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Law

AbstractPhishing is an act to commit fraud by tricking the target with the intention of stealing the target's account, by spreading broadcasts which are often carried out through fake emails with fake information that directs the target to a fake page to trap the target so that the perpetrator gets access to the victim's account. Phishing still has some obscurity, especially in the modus operandi of the perpetrator. Therefore, this research aims to analyze and explain the modus operandi of the criminal act of phishing according to the ITE Law. This research is a normative legal research. Because the writing of this research in seeking the truth in order to answer legal issues raised by the author uses secondary data to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines, and tends to image law as a perspective discipline, which means that only see the law from the point of view of the norms only, which of course is prescriptive. This approach uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.Keywords: Phishing Crime; Cyber; Operandi Mode.AbstrakPhising adalah suatu perbuatan untuk melakukan penipuan dengan mengelabui target dengan maksud untuk mencuri akun target, dengan cara menyebarkan broadcast yang seringkali dilakukan melalui email palsu dengan muatan informasi palsu yang mengarahkan target ke halaman palsu untuk menjebak target sehingga pelaku mendapatkan akses terhadap akun korban, Secara ringkas Perbuatan phising masih memiliki beberapa kekaburan terutama pada modus operandi pelaku. Oleh karena itulah penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan terkait modus operandi Tindak pidana Phising menurut UU ITE. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Karena penelitian ini dalam mencari kebenaran guna menjawab isu hukum yang diangkat penulis menggunakan data sekunder untuk menemukan suatu aturan-aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin-doktrin hukum, dan cenderung mencitrakan hukum sebagai disiplin prespektif, yang berarti hanya melihat hukum dari sudut pandang norma-normanya saja, yang tentunya bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana Phising; Siber; Modus Operandi.

scholarly journals Resolution of Disputes Regarding Unlawful Acts by the Government in the Administrative Justice System in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
. Ridwan
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Fair Compensation ◽  
Illegal Acts ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

This study aims to analyze the expansion of the absolute competence of Administrative Courts to examine factual actions and/or illegal acts by the government. This paper is a doctrinal legal research using statute and conceptual approach. The result of this study argued that the expansion posed a legal problem since the absolute authority is determined by law. In this case, it is transferred through a Supreme Court Regulation without changing the law. The other problem was also found in the legal basis for judicial review and limited compensation. Ideally, it should be preceded by amending the law, broadening the legal basis for review, and providing fair compensation.   Received: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 5 November 2021

scholarly journals Pemindahan Ibu Kota Indonesia dan Kekuasaan Presiden dalam Perspektif Konstitusi

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Fikri Hadi ◽  
Rosa Ristawati
Keyword(s):  
Capital City ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Constitutional History ◽  
Legal Argument ◽  
City Center ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
History Approach ◽  
The City

Pada 16 Agustus 2019, Presiden Republik Indonesia menyampaikan pidato kenegaraan tentang pemindahan ibu kota Indonesia. Lokasi ibu kota baru juga telah ditetapkan oleh Presiden RI. Penetapan tersebut mendahului pengkajian hukumnya termasuk pembentukan dasar hukum penetapan ibu kota baru. Penelitian ini akan membahas mengenai konsep ibu kota di Indonesia baik dengan membandingkan diluar negeri maupun membahas dalam perspektif sejarah konstitusi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga membahas mengenai kewenangan Presiden dalam melakukan pemindahan dan penetapan ibu kota.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum berupa doctrinal research dengan Pendekatan yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan constitutional historis.Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa konsep ibu kota di Indonesia berbeda dengan di negara lain, seperti di Belanda dan di Malaysia yang memisahkan antara ibu kota dan pusat pemerintahan. Selain itu, disimpulkan bahwa secara konstitusional, Presiden RI tidak mempunyai kewenangan mutlak dalam memindahkan ibu kota. Presiden mempunyai kekuasaan untuk mengajukan usul pemindahan ibu kota untuk selanjutnya harus dibahas bersama dan mendapatkan persetujuan dari parlemen.In 16 August 2019, the President of Republic of Indonesia gave speech on an idea of the translocation of the Indonesian capital city. The new capital city has also already decided by the President. The decision is made before the legal analysis including the legal basis of the decision to have new capital city. This paper will discuss the concept of the capital city from general- legal perspective to comparative perspective. This paper also discuss on how the concept of capital city is developed in Indonesia from the historical constitutional perspective. It will also analyze the presidential authority on the idea of proposing and deciding the translocation of the capital city. The argument in this paper is written as a legal argument by having perspective on the doctrinal-legal approach. It will use conceptual approach, legal and statutes approach and constitutional history approach. This paper ends up with the conclusion that the concept of the Indonesian capital city is different from the concept of the capital city in other countries, such as the Netherlands and Malaysia. In both countries, the concept of capital city is separated from the concept of government city, which is as the city center for governmental affairs. Besides, it is concluded that based on the Indonesian Constitution, the President of Republic of Indonesia has no absolute authority on the issue of translocation of the capital city. The President of Republic of Indonesia may have the power to propose the translocation of the capital city but there shall be further process of joint discussion and joint approval by the President and the DPR.

scholarly journals Standard Patterns of Considerations in Law, District Regulation and Qanun Based on Legal Rules in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
Husna Sartika ◽  
Eddy Purnama ◽  
Ilyas Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Public Life ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sequential Data ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Standard Pattern ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Aceh Province ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Law

The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word "membentuk" or "form" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using the word "menetapkan" or "establish" because the institution that makes local regulations is a local government consisting of elements of local governments and local people's representative councils. This consideration follows Annex II of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation as amended by Law Number 15 of 2019. However, the Qanun used the word "membentuk" or "form" due following Article 233 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 the Year 2006 on Aceh Governance and Annex II of Aceh Qanun Number 5 of 2011 on the Procedures for the Establishment of Qanun.

scholarly journals BETWEEN LEGALITY AND LEGITIMACY: differences and reasoning behind the TSE’s definition and blocking of “fake news”

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-341
Author(s):  
Ivan Paganotti ◽  
Leonardo Moretti Sakamoto ◽  
Rodrigo Pelegrini Ratier
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Fake News ◽  
Legal Decision ◽  
Legal Argument ◽  
Argumentative Strategy ◽  
Legal Arguments ◽  
Legal Guidelines

This paper analyzes the legal basis on which the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE) identified and removed content which it considered to be “fake news”. To accomplish this, we evaluate the argumentative strategy behind the first ruling which defined the jurisprudence, including allegations of corruption against then presidential candidate, Marina Silva (Rede party) in the 2018 presidential election. Analysis of this case shows that the legal system went to great efforts to legitimize this case in academic studies, but it appeared to be less concerned with the legal arguments as it only cited recent legal guidelines on the dissemination of fake news but did not provide further detail on them. Even though journalistic sources were included in the legal decision, the legal argument disregarded mainstream news reports.O artigo analisa a fundamentação legal apresentada pelo Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) para identificar e remover conteúdos considerados como “notícias falsas”. Para isso, será avaliada a estratégia de argumentação ao redor do primeiro julgamento que definiu a jurisprudência nesse caso, envolvendo denúncias de corrupção contra a então pré-candidata a presidente, Marina Silva, do partido Rede, na eleição presidencial de 2018. A análise do caso revela um maior esforço dialógico do judiciário para reforçar a legitimidade do caso em estudos acadêmicos, o que contrasta com menor preocupação com a argumentação legal, visto que diretrizes de leis recentes que tratam da disseminação de notícias falsas são citadas sem aprofundamento. Entretanto, ainda que fontes jornalísticas constem em sua argumentação, foram ignoradas as notícias publicadas pela imprensa tradicional que tratavam das mesmas denúncias removidas.El artículo analiza la fundamentación legal presentada por el Tribunal Superior Electoral (TSE) brasileño para la identificación y remoción de contenidos considerados como “noticias falsas”. Será evaluada la estrategia de argumentación alrededor del primer juicio que definió la jurisprudencia en ese caso, involucrando denuncias de corrupción contra la entonces pre-candidata a presidenta, Marina Silva (partido Rede) en la elección presidencial de 2018. El análisis del caso revela gran esfuerzo dialógico por parte del poder judicial para reforzar la legitimidad del caso en los estudios académicos, lo que contrasta con menor preocupación por el argumento legal, ya que las directrices de las leyes recientes que se ocupan de la difusión de noticias falsas fueron citadas sin más elaboración. A pesar de que las fuentes periodísticas están incluidas en su argumento, fueron ignoradas las noticias publicadas por la prensa tradicional que se ocuparon de las mismas quejas eliminadas.

scholarly journals Proses Pelaksanaan Roya Partial Pada Kantor Notaris

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 466
Author(s):  
Gilang Bella Saputra ◽  
I Made Dedy Priyanto
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Moving Objects ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Institution ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law

Roya Partial is a new legal institution formed, by providing an alternative settlement of repayment on a credit basis by paying off a portion of the credit that goes by pulling some of its collateral. “Article 2 of the Law No. 4-year 1996 on land rights and objects relating to the land”, giving gaps in the performance of Roya Partial. Whereas article 1163 Civil Code states the rights of liabilities (mortgages) are not indivisible but bind all parts of the goods/moving objects. This can actually lead to a conflict of norms against both regulations. Based on that, formulated 2 problems 1) What is the legal basis of the implementation of a partial Roya, (2) How to process the implementation of Roya Partial in notary Office, the purpose of this research is to know the legal basis in the implementation of a partial roya and to know the process of implementing Roya Partial in notary office.  The legal research method used is a normative legal research method of using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. Right to land that can be burdened by article 4 UUHT Jo article 25, 33, 39 UUPA namely: property rights, business rights, building rights, rights, houses and property rights in the unit and there are several procedures regarding the deletion of liabilities from the settlement to the execution of the force, then the method of implementation of a partial Roya notary office.

MANAJEMEN PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH DILAHAT DARI PERUNDANGAN-UNDANGAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Hotma Napitupulu, MM.
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Empirical Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Regulatory Oversight ◽  
Secondary Data Source ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Law ◽  
Harmonization Of Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Management of regulatory oversight under the law, analyze the legal consequences with its use as a system of legal oversight mechanisms in order to create harmonization of law in the region. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source.

scholarly journals A Comparative Viewpoint on Illegal Contracts: In Favor of Flexibility and Proportionality

Global Jurist ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Esther Cerchia
Keyword(s):  
Dense Network ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract In today’s society, a dense network of laws and regulations presides the actions of all people. And it is so extensive that any number of activities – including the formation of contracts – is capable of breaking the law. This is why it is even more important, nowadays, to reconsider the issue of contracts that violate legal rules. The trend in favor of flexible remedies reveals that the rigidity of the more traditional solutions might not be the best choice in this day and age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document