Automatic and Controlled Processes in Prejudice: The Role of Stereotypes and Personal Beliefs

2014 ◽  
pp. 195-226
Topoi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith H. Martens

AbstractDichotomous thinking about mental phenomena is abundant in philosophy. One particularly tenacious dichotomy is between “automatic” and “controlled” processes. In this characterization automatic and unintelligent go hand in hand, as do non-automatic and intelligent. Accounts of skillful action have problematized this dichotomous conceptualization and moved towards a more nuanced understanding of human agency. This binary thinking is, however, still abundant in the philosophy of joint action. Habits and skills allow us agentic ways of guiding complex action routines that would otherwise overwhelm our reflective capacities. In this paper, I look at how theories of skill, habit, and know-how in individual action can inform a non-dichotomous account of joint action. I argue that a fuller understanding of joint agency has to understand not only group know-how, but also the role of attention and the highly integrated types of control that allow agents to act together.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-824
Author(s):  
Jill M. Chonody ◽  
Vickey Sultzman ◽  
Jennifer Hippie

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Rabinowitz ◽  
Samuel Melamed ◽  
Mabel Feiner ◽  
Esther Weisberg ◽  
Joseph Ribak

Author(s):  
Geoffrey Haddock ◽  
Sapphira Thorne ◽  
Lukas Wolf

Attitudes refer to overall evaluations of people, groups, ideas, and other objects, reflecting whether individuals like or dislike them. Attitudes have been found to be good predictors of behavior, with generally medium-sized effects. The role of attitudes in guiding behavior may be the primary reason why people’s social lives often revolve around expressing and discussing their attitudes, and why social psychology researchers have spent decades examining attitudes. Two central questions in the study of attitudes concern when and how attitudes predict behavior. The “when” question has been addressed over decades of research that has identified circumstances under which attitudes are more or less likely to predict behavior. That is, attitudes are stronger predictors of behaviors when both constructs are assessed in a corresponding or matching way, when attitudes are stronger, and among certain individuals and in certain situations and domains. The “how” question concerns influential models in the attitudes literature that provide a better understanding of the processes through which attitudes are linked with behaviors. For instance, these models indicate that other constructs need to be taken into account in understanding the attitude-behavior link, including intentions to perform a behavior, whether individuals perceive themselves to be in control of their behavior, and what they believe others around them think the individual should do (i.e., norms). The models also describe whether attitudes relate to behavior through relatively deliberative and controlled processes or relatively automatic and spontaneous processes. Overall, the long history of research on attitude-behavior links has provided a clearer prediction of when attitudes are linked with behaviors and a better understanding of the processes underlying this link.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-113
Author(s):  
Fabian Winiger

AbstractThis commentary takes issue with three central themes contained in Michael and Tracy Balboni’s Hostility to Hospitality: the argument against a ‘spirituality of immanence’ prevalent in biomedicine, the proposal for ‘structural pluralism’ as a model of institutional reform that addresses the alleged deficiencies of immanence, and the role of ‘chief love’ in the conceptualisation of a spirituality suitable to this form of pluralism. Drawing on a brief discussion of spiritualities which do not fit into the hermeneutic of ‘chief love’, we suggest that the Balbonis’ argument contains largely unexamined assumptions coloured by the authors’ own theological commitments. We contend that the success of ‘structural pluralism’ hinges on the extent to which the authors can credibly disentangle particular religious interests from their proposal for institutional reform, and that this requires broad consultation of spiritual experiences beyond ‘chief love’ and the critique of immanence. The World Health Organisation’s cross-cultural methodology employed in the development of a quality of life measure that incorporates “religiousness, spirituality and personal beliefs” (‘WHOQOL-SRPB’) is briefly discussed as an example of such consultation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jindriska Fiserova ◽  
Martin W. Goldberg

Eukaryotic cells have developed a series of highly controlled processes of transport between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The present review focuses on the latest advances in our understanding of nucleocytoplasmic exchange of molecules in yeast, a widely studied model organism in the field. It concentrates on the role of individual proteins such as nucleoporins and karyopherins in the translocation process and relates this to how the organization of the nuclear pore complex effectively facilitates the bidirectional transport between the two compartments.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Martin ◽  
Estelle Guerdoux ◽  
Deborah Dressaire ◽  
Jerome Molinier ◽  
Denis Brouillet
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Mahmood Mosavinezhad ◽  
Maryam Safara ◽  
Sadegh Kasir ◽  
khanbabaee Minoo ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document