Reality Therapy, Solution-Focused, and Behavioral Approaches to Counseling and Psychotherapy Groups

Speech-language pathologists can play a critical role in providing education and intervention to prevent social withdrawal, prevent premature disability, and maximize cognitive functioning in persons with MCI. The purpose of this article is to describe positive, solution-focused educational program that speech-language pathologists can implement with family care partners to improve relationships and provide quality care for someone living with MCI.

Download Full-text

AAC Collaboration Using the Self-Anchored Rating Scales (SARS): An Aphasia Case Study

Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication ◽

10.1044/aac21.4.136 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 21 (4) ◽

pp. 136-143

Author(s):

Lynn E. Fox

Keyword(s):

Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽

Rating Scales ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Therapeutic Process ◽

Family Counseling ◽

The Self ◽

Alternative Communication ◽

Her Family ◽

Solution Focused

Abstract The self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is a technique that augments collaboration between Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventionists, their clients, and their clients' support networks. SARS is a technique used in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, a branch of systemic family counseling. It has been applied to treating speech and language disorders across the life span, and recent case studies show it has promise for promoting adoption and long-term use of high and low tech AAC. I will describe 2 key principles of solution-focused therapy and present 7 steps in the SARS process that illustrate how clinicians can use the SARS to involve a person with aphasia and his or her family in all aspects of the therapeutic process. I will use a case study to illustrate the SARS process and present outcomes for one individual living with aphasia.

Download Full-text

Clinical Issues: Applications of Solution-Focused Concepts to the Practice of Speech-Language Pathology

Perspectives on Language Learning and Education ◽

10.1044/lle11.1.8 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 8-14

Author(s):

Sue E. Ouellette

Keyword(s):

Speech Language Pathology ◽

Clinical Issues ◽

Language Pathology ◽

Solution Focused

Download Full-text

Principles of Solution Focused Therapy and Their Application to Audiology

Perspectives on Public Health Issues Related to Hearing and Balance ◽

10.1044/phi15.1.27 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 27-33

Author(s):

James C. Blair

Keyword(s):

Basic Assumption ◽

Current Practice ◽

Helping Professions ◽

Patient Centered ◽

Therapy Approach ◽

Agents Of Change ◽

Centered Care ◽

Client Centered Therapy ◽

Solution Focused ◽

Solution Focused Therapy

The concept of client-centered therapy (Rogers, 1951) has influenced many professions to refocus their treatment of clients from assessment outcomes to the person who uses the information from this assessment. The term adopted for use in the professions of Communication Sciences and Disorders and encouraged by The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) is patient-centered care, with the goal of helping professions, like audiology, focus more centrally on the patient. The purpose of this paper is to examine some of the principles used in a patient-centered therapy approach first described by de Shazer (1985) named Solution-Focused Therapy and how these principles might apply to the practice of audiology. The basic assumption behind this model is that people are the agents of change and the professional is there to help guide and enable clients to make the change the client wants to make. This model then is focused on solutions, not on the problems. It is postulated that by using the assumptions in this model audiologists will be more effective in a shorter time than current practice may allow.

Download Full-text

Rorschach-CS Scores of Six Groups of Patients

Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach ◽

10.1027/1192-5604/a000039 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 34 (1) ◽

pp. 24-55 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Caspar C. Berghout ◽

Jolien Zevalkink ◽

Abraham N. J. Pieters ◽

Gregory J. Meyer

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Health Care ◽

Health Care Organizations ◽

Total Sample ◽

Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Treatment Type ◽

Psychotherapy Groups ◽

Cross Sectional Design

In this study we used a quasiexperimental, cross-sectional design with six cohorts differing in phase of treatment (pretreatment, posttreatment, 2-year posttreatment) and treatment type (psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy) and investigated scores on 39 Rorschach-CS variables. The total sample consisted of 176 participants from four mental health care organizations in The Netherlands. We first examined pretreatment differences between patients entering psychoanalysis and patients entering psychoanalytic psychotherapy. The two treatment groups did not seem to differ substantially before treatment, with the exception of the level of ideational problems. Next, we studied the outcome of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy by comparing the Rorschach-CS scores of the six groups of patients. In general, we found significant differences between pretreatment and posttreatment on a relatively small number of Rorschach-CS variables. More pre/post differences were found between the psychoanalytic psychotherapy groups than between the psychoanalysis groups. More research is needed to examine whether analyzing clusters of variables might reveal other results.

Download Full-text