Quality Assurance of Public Administration Programmes in Poland

Author(s):  
Witold Mikułowski
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Pinheiro ◽  
Nilo Martins ◽  
Melina Soares ◽  
Geraldo Neto ◽  
Wylliams Santos

The prioritization of requirements is a critical activity in quality assurance. However, in public institutions, prioritization faces conflicts with financial constraints. Problem: Increasing the complexity of requirements. Objective: Proposition of a Kanban method to improve the transparency of activities and facilitate prioritization. Method: An action research carried out in two cycles at the Attorney General's Office of the State of Pernambuco, involving the development team and public managers. Result: The presentation of the method's effectiveness as a mechanism facilitating transparency and as a support to management in prioritization.


Author(s):  
MOROZ S.,

За результатами аналізу відповідей студентів з Європейськогопростору вищої освіти було з’ясовано думку респондентів щодо місця таролі держави у забезпеченні контролю за якістю надання освітніх послугзакладом вищої освіти. Розглянуто особливості взаємовідносинінституту держави та інституції університету в контекстізабезпечення якості вищої освіти. Крім того, в статті обґрунтованонапрями вдосконалення змісту та практики використання механізмівдержавного управління якістю вищої освіти, а також визначенопріоритети використання суб’єктами державного управління окремихметодів впливу на систему забезпечення якості вищої освіти в Україні. Basing on the results of survey of answers of students from the Europeanhigher education space, there was determined an opinion of respondents as fora place and role of state in provision quality control of educational services ofhigher educational institutes. The features of the relationship between theInstitute of state and the institutes of the University in the context of provisionof higher education quality. In addition, the article substantiates the directionsof improving the content and practice of usage of mechanisms of statemanagement of the higher education quality, as well as determined thepriorities for the subjects of public administration to use certain methods ofinfluence on the system of quality assurance of higher education in Ukraine.


Author(s):  
Agnes Ers ◽  
Kristina Tegler Jerselius

AbstractThe aim of this chapter is to explore the method of peer review as it has been practised within the framework of the Swedish national system for quality assurance of higher education. By highlighting and comparing examples from two reviews, 1997–1998 and 2016–2017, we want to show how the method of peer review has evolved over time and in what way has it been affected by changes made in the system. The study shows that the national system for quality assurance of higher education with peer review as a central method has changed surprisingly little in Sweden during the period studied (1995–2017). Over time, the demands for transparency, predictability and equivalence have increased, which has to some extent undermined the authority of the assessors. At the same time, it is a development which is a logical consequence of—not a break with—the coherent national system for quality assurance of higher education that was put into effect as early as the mid-1990s.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Itai Kabonga

This article discusses the principles and practice of monitoring and evaluation and emphasises that monitoring and evaluation (M and E) is paraphernalia for effective development. The discourse of monitoring and evaluation in development practice and theory has gained prominence over the years. It is uncontested that the purveyors of development are increasingly prioritising monitoring and evaluation as a platform for learning and accountability. This growing importance has been caused by the growing voice of the civil society’s scrutiny on good governance, and a demand for efficient public administration. At the same time, a plethora of development funders demand that M and E be implemented as a platform for learning and accountability. Despite growing importance of M and E, there seems to be a lack of clarity on the principles of M and E. The article finds its value in locating how M and E, augmented by appropriate principles, leads to effective development. Underlined by qualitative data collection methods, the article discusses relevant principles such as learning, accountability, participatory approaches, quality assurance, and reporting in monitoring and evaluation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 152-158
Author(s):  
В. О. Резніченко

The relevance of the article is that in the theory and practice of administrative law the leading place is occupied by the category of tools of public administration. The sphere of providing higher education in Ukraine is not exclusive. The article forms licensing and accreditation as tools of public administration of higher education in Ukraine. It is determined that such procedures determine the efficiency of educational institutions and the quality of education they provide. Medicines are a group of consumer goods of special social importance. It is substantiated that licensing in the field of higher education is a tool of public administration (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine), the content of which is the issuance, renewal and revocation of free economic licenses, issuance of duplicate free economic licenses, invalidation of free economic licenses, licensing cases and license registers. control over the observance by licensees of license conditions, issuance of orders on elimination of violations of license conditions, as well as orders on elimination of violations of legislation in the field of higher education. It is substantiated that accreditation is a tool of public administration (National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education), which is provided by current legislation in order to verify the ability (opportunity) of free education to carry out quality educational activities to train specialists in a particular specialization. It is concluded that licensing and accreditation as tools of public administration of higher education in Ukraine - is the need for higher education to confirm the compliance of the educational program of a particular specialty and level of higher education standard of higher education and the right of higher education to appeal to a certain subject of public administration (Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine and the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document