Jacqueline Mowbray and Tim Sherman Australia’s International Tax Treaties: a Critical Appraisal

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 312
Author(s):  
Shkumbin Asllani

In today’s international taxation most of the developing countries enter into tax treaties which are drafted in line with the OECD MC to eliminate double taxation. Yet, is well-known fact that tax treaties in practice are abused by tax payers, therefore, majority of states have introduce legislation specifically designed to prevent tax avoidance and protect their domestic interests. In legal practice and literature the act of overriding international tax treaties and denying treaty benefits in favour of domestic law provisions threatens main principle of international law and therefore is questionable to what extend the relationship between domestic law and international tax treaty agreements bridges the international norms.


Author(s):  
Hongler Peter

Chapter 2 is the main part of the book and it is structured along the different sources of the international law of taxation. This includes (i) treaties, (ii) customary international law, (iii) general principles of international law, and (iv) soft law. The chapter contains a comprehensive outline of the functioning of double tax treaties and other treaties focusing on tax matters such as treaties on mutual exchange of taxpayer information. The entire OECD MC is discussed and reference is made to brief case studies in order to allow the reader a better understanding of the international tax regime. A particular focus is in on the functioning the allocation rules in Arts 6–22 OECD model convention, however, this chapter also includes general remarks on the interpretation of tax treaties and soft law used in international tax matters. The chapter closes with a concise overview of the EU tax system.


World Affairs ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin P. Johnson

The international tax regime appears to be a weak system of global governance on the surface; however, I find that this system remains effective. This governance structure is built upon the thousands of tax treaties that function as policy instruments for advancing the implementation of global tax policy. Yet there is conflicting evidence in relation to the efficacy of these treaties, necessitating further exploration. In this article, I offer an accessible introduction to some of the key dynamics of the international tax regime and, in doing so, systematically address whether tax treaties may have the capacity to spur cross-border investment in securities. Using augmented gravity models, I find strong empirical evidence in favor of my theory that tax treaties function as credible commitments to international tax norms, potentially increasing portfolio holdings of some foreign securities. My findings should be of significant importance to scholars of international organizations, global governance, and international tax policy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Sunita Jogarajan

AbstractASEAN member countries recently reiterated and renewed their commitment to creating the ASEAN Economic Community. Tax has a role to play in facilitating the creation of the AEC and ASEAN member countries have committed to completing the intra-ASEAN network of bilateral tax treaties in pursuit of this goal. This paper suggests that instead of continuing with the monumental task of agreeing individual bilateral tax treaties, ASEAN member countries should learn from the experience of other regional blocs and conclude a multilateral tax treaty. The conclusion of a multilateral tax treaty would address the general problems associated with bilateral tax treaties, strengthen ASEAN's presence in international tax relations and symbolise ASEAN's commitment to the creation of the AEC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yariv Brauner

The international tax regime has recently made large strides toward a reform of its dispute resolution mechanism. Long-anticipated, mandatory tax treaty arbitration is finally gaining legitimacy beyond limited use by a few countries. Yet, the opposition to international arbitration among developing countries, led by Latin American countries, has not waned. This Article tracks this opposition to its origins and argues that it is misguided in the case of tax treaty arbitration, which such countries should rather generally support.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55

On October 1, 2019, the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting entered into force with respect to the Russian Federation. The main purpose of the MLI is to establish minimum standards for combating international tax avoidance. The MLI will extend the key approaches of the BEPS plan at once to a large number of bilateral double tax treaties. The application of the MLI is expected from January 1, 2021 in relation to a number of tax treaties concluded by the Russian Federation. At the same time, certain provisions of the MLI leave some questions about their application and may cause new problems for the taxpayers and tax authorities. In the short term, the application of a number of MLI provisions may be expected to increase uncertainty in international tax planning and lead to an increase in the number of disputes over tax treaties. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the key provisions of the MLI and identify possible problems of their enforcement for the subsequent analysis of potential ways to overcome the legal uncertainty of the application of the MLI. To this end, the tasks were set to study the goal of adopting the MLI, and analyze the content and procedure for the application of the MLI, as well as the content of the key standard of the MLI—the principal purpose test. Identifying the problems of law enforcement before the start of active use of the MLI is important, since it would allow one to pay attention to possible problems at an earlier stage and quickly move to their resolution, which would contribute to the formation of a higher level of legal certainty in the field of international tax planning and further development of foreign economic cooperation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document