scholarly journals The 9-Item Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) score is not useful in evaluating EMR (scribe) note quality in Emergency Medicine

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 981-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Wang ◽  
William Dunlop ◽  
Hamish Rodda ◽  
Michael Ben-Meir ◽  
Margaret Staples ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Documentation Quality ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Quality Instrument

SummaryBackground: Scribes are assisting Emergency Physicians by writing their electronic clinical notes at the bedside during consultations. They increase physician productivity and improve their working conditions. The quality of Emergency scribe notes is unevaluated and important to determine.Objective: The primary objective of the study was to determine if the quality of Emergency Department scribe notes was equivalent to physician only notes, using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument, Nine-item tool (PDQI-9).Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study comparing 110 scribed to 110 non-scribed Emergency Physician notes written at Cabrini Emergency Department, Australia. Consultations during a randomised controlled trial of scribe/doctor productivity in 2016 were used. Emergency physicians and nurses rated randomly selected, blinded and de-identified notes, 2 raters per note. Comparisons were made between paired scribed and unscribed notes and between raters of each note. Characteristics of individual raters were examined. The ability of the tool to discriminate between good and poor notes was tested.Results: The PDQI-9 tool has significant issues. Individual items had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.93), but there was very poor agreement between raters (Pearson’s r=0.07, p=0.270). There were substantial differences in PDQI-9 scores allocated by each rater, with some giving typically lower scores than others, F(25,206)=1.93, p=0.007. The tool was unable to distinguish good from poor notes, F(3,34)=1.15, p=0.342. There was no difference in PDQI-9 score between scribed and non-scribed notes.Conclusions: The PDQI-9 documentation quality tool did not demonstrate reliability or validity in evaluating Emergency Medicine consultation notes. We found no evidence that scribed notes were of poorer quality than non-scribed notes, however Emergency scribe note quality has not yet been determined.Citation: Walker KJ, Wang A, Dunlop W, Rodda H, Ben-Meir M, Staples M. The 9-Item Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) score is not useful in evaluating EMR (scribe) note quality in Emergency Medicine. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 981–993 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI2017050080

scholarly journals Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (7441) ◽  
pp. 673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Schroter ◽  
Nick Black ◽  
Stephen Evans ◽  
James Carpenter ◽  
Fiona Godlee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group Score ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Quality Instrument

AbstractObjective To determine the effects of training on the quality of peer review.Design Single blind randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups receiving different types of training plus a control group.Setting and participants Reviewers at a general medical journal.Interventions Attendance at a training workshop or reception of a self taught training package focusing on what editors want from reviewers and how to critically appraise randomised controlled trials.Main outcome measures Quality of reviews of three manuscripts sent to reviewers at four to six monthly intervals, evaluated using the validated review quality instrument; number of deliberate major errors identified; time taken to review the manuscripts; proportion recommending rejection of the manuscripts.Results Reviewers in the self taught group scored higher in review quality after training than did the control group (score 2.85 v 2.56; difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.44; P = 0.001), but the difference was not of editorial significance and was not maintained in the long term. Both intervention groups identified significantly more major errors after training than did the control group (3.14 and 2.96 v 2.13; P < 0.001), and this remained significant after the reviewers' performance at baseline assessment was taken into account. The evidence for benefit of training was no longer apparent on further testing six months after the interventions. Training had no impact on the time taken to review the papers but was associated with an increased likelihood of recommending rejection (92% and 84% v 76%; P = 0.002).Conclusions Short training packages have only a slight impact on the quality of peer review. The value of longer interventions needs to be assessed.

scholarly journals How to improve quality of care in overcrowded emergency departments? Development and evaluation of a virtual research environment. (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles-Henri Houze Cerfon ◽  
Christine Vaissié ◽  
Laurent Gout ◽  
Bruno Bastiani ◽  
Sandrine Charpentier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Research Environment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ed Overcrowding ◽  
Virtual Research Environment

BACKGROUND Despite wide literature on ED overcrowding, scientific knowledge on emergency physicians’ cognitive processes coping with overcrowding is limited. OBJECTIVE We sought to develop and evaluate a virtual research environment that will allow us to study the effect of physicians’ strategies and behaviours on quality of care in the context of emergency department overcrowding. METHODS A simulation-based observational study was conducted over two stages: the development of a simulation model and its evaluation. A research environment in Emergency Medicine combining virtual reality and simulated patients has been designed and developed. Then, twelve emergency physicians took part in simulation scenarios and had to manage thirteen patients during a 2-hour period. The study outcome was the authenticity of the environment through realism, consistency and mastering. The realism was the resemblance perceived by the participants between virtual and real Emergency Department. The consistency of the scenario and the participants’ mastering of the environment was expected for 90% of the participants. RESULTS The virtual emergency department was considered realistic with no significant difference from the real world concerning facilities and resources except for the length of time of procedures that was perceived to be shorter. 100% of participants deemed that patient information, decision-making and managing patient flow were similar to real clinical practice. The virtual environment was well-mastered by all participants over the course of the scenarios. CONCLUSIONS The new simulation tool, Virtual Research Environment in Emergency Medicine has been successfully designed and developed. It has been assessed as perfectly authentic by emergency physicians compared to real EDs and thus offers another way to study human factors, quality of care and patient safety in the context of ED overcrowding.

scholarly journals Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 – prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Maláska ◽  
Jan Stašek ◽  
František Duška ◽  
Martin Balík ◽  
Jan Máca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that administration of dexamethasone 20 mg is superior to a 6 mg dose in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. The secondary objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 20 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg. The exploratory objective of this study is to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days.

P148: Emergency physicians’ perception on engaging patients in their emergency department care

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S117-S118
Author(s):  
L. Krebs ◽  
C. Villa-Roel ◽  
S. Couperthwaite ◽  
B. Holroyd ◽  
M. Ospina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Emergency Department Care

Introduction: Patient engagement in health decision-making is an important research area within emergency medicine. Studies suggest that patients are often not highly engaged in care decisions, and may not be aware that there are decisions in which they can be involved. This study explored emergency physicians (EPs) perceptions of their patient engagement practices. Methods: As part of a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, an introductory seminar was held at 15 emergency department (ED) sites in Alberta. Seminars highlighted physician-patient communication and expectation gaps documented in local studies. As part of the seminar evaluation, EPs were asked to reflect on their engagement of patients in their practice. Descriptive results are reported. Results: A total of 114 EP surveys were returned. The majority of respondents were male (68%) and nearly 40% of respondents have practiced emergency medicine for 5 years or less. Less than half of the EPs (43%) reported always or usually asking their patients about their ED visit care expectations. Approximately one-third (32%) reported always or usually checking their patients’ understanding of management options (e.g., tests, treatments and/or procedures). Patients management preferences were always or usually elicited 24% of the time. Despite limited consistency in ascertaining patients’ preferences, 39% of EPs indicated that they always or usually considered their patients’ preferences when choosing a management plan. Half of the EPs (51%) reported that they always or usually involved their patients in decision-making. Yet, when asked whether other EPs involved their patients in decision-making, only 15% reported that they believed their fellow clinicians did this always or usually. On average, 68% of respondents believed their patients wanted to be completely or mostly involved in their ED and decision-making; however, 16% believed patients were actually completely or mostly involved in the ED care and decision-making. Conclusion: EPs agreed that patients want to be actively involved in their ED care decisions. Yet, their reflection on their own practice, and especially their perception of their colleagues’, highlight large gaps between physicians’ perception of what patients would like and what patients actually receive. Further research should explore these interactions in depth, understand what constrains EPs from involving patients and explore patient perceptions of these interactions.

scholarly journals Laryngoscopic views during rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (06) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin A. Graham ◽  
Angela J. Oglesby ◽  
Diana Beard ◽  
Dermot W. McKeown
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Rapid Sequence Intubation ◽  
Intubation Attempt ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Lehane Grade ◽  
Visualization Techniques

ABSTRACT:Objectives:Our objective was to document and compare the views obtained at laryngoscopy during emergency department (ED) rapid sequence intubation (RSI) by anesthetists and emergency physicians of varying seniority and experience.Methods:Data were prospectively collected on every intubation attempt in 7 urban Scottish EDs for 2 calendar years, commencing Jan. 11, 1999. Data included patient’s age, gender, grade and specialty of intubator, laryngoscopic grade, and number of intubation attempts. Quality of laryngoscopic visualization was graded using the Cormack–Lehane scale, with grades I and II considered good visualization. A descriptive analysis was performed, and key statistical comparisons made.Results:During the study period, 735 patients underwent RSI, and grade of intubation was documented in 672 cases (91%). In total, 68.2%, 23.4%, 6.1% and 2.4% of the intubations were classified as Cormack–Lehane grade I, II, III and IV respectively. Overall, anesthetists and anesthesia trainees achieved good laryngoscopic visualization in 94.0% of cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.8%–96.4%) and emergency physicians and emergency medicine trainees did so in 89.2% of cases (95% CI, 85.5%–92.3%;p= 0.027). Specialist registrars and senior house officers in anesthesia were more likely to obtain good visualization than their emergency medicine counterparts (p= 0.034 and 0.035 respectively). Consultants in emergency medicine were more likely to obtain good views than their anesthesia counterparts, but this difference was not statistically significant.Conclusions:Anesthetic trainees obtain better laryngoscopic views than emergency medicine trainees, but these differences disappear with increasing emergency physician seniority, suggesting a training and experience effect. Emergency medicine trainees may benefit from additional focus on laryngoscopic visualization techniques early in their training period.

scholarly journals Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of specialty outpatient versus nurse-led telephonic palliative care of older adults with advanced illness

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e025692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corita R Grudzen ◽  
Deborah J Shim ◽  
Abigail M Schmucker ◽  
Jeanne Cho ◽  
Keith S Goldfeld
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage

IntroductionEmergency department (ED)-initiated palliative care has been shown to improve patient-centred outcomes in older adults with serious, life-limiting illnesses. However, the optimal modality for providing such interventions is unknown. This study aims to compare nurse-led telephonic case management to specialty outpatient palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness on: (1) quality of life in patients; (2) healthcare utilisation; (3) loneliness and symptom burden and (4) caregiver strain, caregiver quality of life and bereavement.Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled trial in ED patients comparing two established models of palliative care: nurse-led telephonic case management and specialty, outpatient palliative care. We will enrol 1350 patients aged 50+ years and 675 of their caregivers across nine EDs. Eligible patients: (1) have advanced cancer (metastatic solid tumour) or end-stage organ failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, end-stage renal disease with glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/m2, or global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease stage III, IV or oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); (2) speak English; (3) are scheduled for ED discharge or observation status; (4) reside locally; (5) have a working telephone and (6) are insured. Patients will be excluded if they: (1) have dementia; (2) have received hospice care or two or more palliative care visits in the last 6 months or (3) reside in a long-term care facility. We will use patient-level block randomisation, stratified by ED site and disease. Effectiveness will be compared by measuring the impact of each intervention on the specified outcomes. The primary outcome will measure change in patient quality of life.Ethics and disseminationInstitutional Review Board approval was obtained at all study sites. Trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03325985; Pre-results.

scholarly journals Comparison of the effects of intravenous propofol and inhalational desflurane on the quality of early recovery after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e039881
Author(s):  
Jaesik Park ◽  
Minhee Kim ◽  
Yong Hyun Park ◽  
Jung-Woo Shim ◽  
Hyung Mook Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesWe compared early recovery outcomes between living kidney donors who received total intravenous (IV) propofol versus inhalational desflurane during hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.DesignA single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial.SettingUniversity hospital.ParticipantsStudy participants were enrolled between October 2019 and February 2020. A total of 80 living donors were randomly assigned to an intravenous propofol group (n=40) or a desflurane group (n=40).InterventionPropofol group received intravenous propofol and desflurane group received desflurane, as a maintenance anaesthetic.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe quality of postoperative functional recovery was primarily assessed using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire on postoperative day 1. Secondarily, ambulation, pain score, rescue analgesics, complications and total hospital stay were assessed postoperatively.ResultsOur study population included 35 males and 45 females. The mean age was 46±13 years. The global QoR-40K score (161 (154–173) vs 152 (136–161) points, respectively, p=0.001) and all five subdimension scores (physical comfort, 49 (45–53) vs 45 (42–48) points, respectively, p=0.003; emotional state, 39 (37–41) vs 37 (33–41) points, respectively, p=0.005; psychological support, 30 (26–34) vs 28 (26–32) points, respectively, p=0.04; physical independence, 16 (11–18) vs 12 (8-14) points, respectively, p=0.004; and pain, 31 (28–33) vs 29 (25-31) points, respectively, p=0.021) were significantly higher in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The early ambulation success rate and numbers of early and total steps were higher, but the incidence of nausea/vomiting was lower, in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The total hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group.ConclusionsIntravenous propofol may enhance the quality of postoperative recovery in comparison to desflurane in living kidney donors.Trial registration numberKCT0004365.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document