A study of sensorineural hearing loss in a tertiary care centre.

2020 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Sowmya Santhosh ◽  
Mohan M ◽  
Jyothiswarup R ◽  
Ashwini S Doddamani
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre

scholarly journals Radiological Assessment of the Indian Children with Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeet Kumar Agarwal ◽  
Satinder Singh ◽  
Samarjit Singh Ghuman ◽  
Shalabh Sharma ◽  
Asish Kr. Lahiri
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Congenital Anomalies ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Indian Children ◽  
3D Scan

Introduction. Congenital sensorineural hearing loss is one of the most common birth defects with incidence of approximately 1 : 1000 live births. Imaging of cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss is frequently performed in an attempt to determine the underlying pathology. There is a paucity of literature from India and for this reason we decided to conduct this study in Indian context to evaluate the various cochleovestibular bony and nerve anomalies by HRCT scan of temporal bone and MRI with 3D scan of inner ear in a tertiary care centre.Material and Methods. A total of 280 children with congenital deafness (158 males and 122 females), between January 2002 to June 2013 were included in the study and they were assessed radiologically by HRCT scan of temporal bone and MRI with 3D scan of inner ear.Results. In the present study we found various congenital anomalies of bony labyrinth and vestibulocochlear nerve. Out of 560 inner ears we found 78 anomalous inner ears. Out of these 78 inner ears 57 (73%) had cochlear anomaly, 68 (87.1%) had anomalous vestibule, 44 (56.4%) had abnormal vestibular aqueduct, 24 (30.7%) had anomalous IAC, and 23 (29.4%) had abnormal cochleovestibular nerves.Conclusion. In present study, we found lower incidences of congenital anomalies comparative to existing literature.

scholarly journals Demography and etiology of congenital sensorineural hearing loss in children

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1193
Author(s):  
O. P. Shrivastava ◽  
Anuj Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Etiological Factors ◽  
Pediatric Age Group ◽  
Tertiary Centre

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is 2-3 per 1000 live births in India, and out of 1000 babies, 1 is having profound degree of hearing loss at birth or in the pre-lingual age group. Hearing loss is categorized as syndromic or non-syndromic hearing loss. The present study was done to identify and diagnose children with SNHL and study the etiological profile, so that all necessary timely precautions may be taken as SNHL in pediatric age group affects not only development of speech and language, but also emotional, social and behavioural development.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in Department of ENT of a tertiary care centre, in 50 children with congenital SNHL. Data on epidemiological and etiological factors were collected. All cases were analyzed for detailed history and underwent clinical and audiological assessment.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Majority of cases presented between 2 and 4 years of age, however age of detection of congenital deafness by parents was most commonly observed in 6-12 months of age. Out of 50 cases, the maximum number of cases [14 (28%)] were having history of antenatal complications, 11 (22%) cases were having adverse perinatal and postnatal history, while in remaining cases, the etiological factors remained undetermined. In one case associated syndrome was observed (Van der Hoeve’s syndrome).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The increased occurrence of etiologies in this study was of prenatal origin, followed by perinatal origin. The present study conducted at a tertiary centre reflects the need of 'High risk' registry maintenance with active surveillance and subsequent screening for early detection of hearing loss.</p><p class="abstract"> </p>

S210 – Asymmetric Sudden SNHL: Is All This Screening Necessary?

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P146-P146
Author(s):  
Selena E. Heman-Ackah ◽  
Dunn Ryan ◽  
Tina C. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Diagnostic Evaluation ◽  
Diagnostic Screening ◽  
Tertiary Care Facility

Objectives A number of factors have been identified that contribute to the presentation of asymmetric sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ASSNHL). Routinely patients presenting with ASSNHL undergo a battery of serologic testing and imaging in an attempt to determine a cause. The study will assess the utility of this diagnostic evaluation in elucidating a cause of an asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. At the conclusion of this presentation, the participants should be able to: 1) Understand the utility of diagnostic screening in the management of ASSNHL. 2) Understand the cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic screening for ASSNHL. Methods The study design is a retrospective chart review. Charts from patients presenting to the otolaryngology clinic of a tertiary care facility between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2007, with ASSNHL confirmed with audiometric evaluation were reviewed. Diagnostic tests included in the work-up of ASSNHL and test results were recorded. Percentage of positive tests was determined and compared to national data. Cost analysis of the diagnostic battery was performed. Results All patients presenting with sudden sensorineural hearing loss received 1 or more of the following serologic and radiographic tests: ANA, cholesterol, creatinine, DNA-ds, ESR, blood glucose, Lyme titer, rheumatoid factor, RPR, FTA-ABS, HSP, T3, TSH and MRI with gadolinium. The average cost associated with the full diagnostic evaluation is greater than $1,500. The positive rate for any of these tests was extremely low. Conclusions The utility of the comprehensive ASSNHL evaluation should be reconsidered. The choice of diagnostic evaluation should be directed by patient risk factors and exposures.

scholarly journals Hearing impairment in patients of renal failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1744
Author(s):  
Joshna Thakur ◽  
Kavita Sachdeva
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Creatinine Level ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Kidney Diseases ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Kidney diseases are emerging public health problems in developing countries. A common complication of renal failure is sensorineural hearing loss which is leading to poor quality of life. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of hearing loss in renal failure patients and to see the correlation of dialysis, ototoxic drugs, and creatinine levels.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This observational study was conducted at the department of otorhinolaryngology, tertiary care center, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) for a period of 18 months i.e.; from March 2019 to August 2020. 70 patients with renal failure were registered for study. In all patients hematological tests include hemoglobin, urea, creatinine, random blood sugar, serum electrolytes and pure tone audiometry was done.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of 70 patients, 51 patients (72.9%) of renal failure had sensorineural hearing loss. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus as comorbidity play important role in hearing loss in renal failure patients. Acoustic reflex was absent in 14.3% of cases which signifying a profound hearing loss and these patients had creatinine level above 6 mg/dl.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Senorineural hearing loss is more prevalent in renal failure patients. Significant association was present between raised creatinine level and sensorineural hearings loss. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were the common comorbidities that have a significant role in hearing loss in renal failure patients. All patients having renal failure have a risk of developing sensorineural hearing loss. So, these patients should be kept under follow up by doing regular pure tone audiometry and taking preventive measures, so that the hearing loss doesn't occur.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document