scholarly journals Memorial-Associated Professor Wilaiporn Bhothisuwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Wiwatana Tanomkiat

Dr. Bhothisuwan’s academic career in Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University was successful. She published articles and wrote books on ultrasonography and breast imaging. She was an active member of The Royal College of Radiologists of Thailand, the Radiological Society of Thailand, and the Medical Ultrasonic Society of Thailand. She served in Broad of Directors of The Royal College of Radiologists of Thailand during 1995- 2015 as president for the Medical Ultrasonic Society of Thailand during 2008-2011. We uniformly admired Dr.Bhothisuwan for her clinical expertise, commitment to education, and sweet and worm personality. 

1955 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 145-161 ◽  

The death of Sir Arthur Keith on 7 January 1955, brought to an end an unusually active and varied career in anatomy and anthropology which had extended over more than sixty years. Of these, a quarter of a century was spent in the Royal College of Surgeons where Keith occupied with great distinction the position of Conservator of the Hunterian Museum. Arthur Keith was born on 5 February 1866 at Old Machar in Aberdeenshire, the son of a farmer, John Keith, and the sixth of his ten children. At the age of sixteen he left school with the intention of taking up farming, but a young undergraduate of Aberdeen University who came to lodge at the farm inspired him with the idea of an academic career. Accordingly, his father sent him to Gordon’s College in order to get grounded in Latin and Greek, and in 1884 he entered Marischal College as a medical student. It was here that Keith came under the influence of James Trail the botanist and John Struthers the anatomist, both of whom evidently provided a powerful inspiration which focused his attention on a scientific career. At the end of his first year he won a prize ‘for the highest distinction in the junior division of the anatomy class’—the prize being a copy of the Origin of species . He was also awarded a scholarship of which he was very badly in need at the time, for his father’s death shortly before had imposed a severe financial strain on his family.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Shih ◽  
Hongyu Chen

Background The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) receives more than 8000 abstracts yearly for scientific presentations, scientific posters, and scientific papers. Each abstract is assigned manually one of 16 top-level categories (e.g. "Breast Imaging") for workflow purposes. Additionally, each abstract receives a grade from 1-10 based on a variety of subjective factors such as style and perceived writing quality. Using machine learning to automate, at least partially, the categorization of abstract submissions can result in saving many hours of manual labor. Methods A total of 45527 RSNA abstract submissions from 2014 through 2019 were ingested, tokenized, and pre-processed with a standard natural language programming protocol. A bag-of-words (BOW) model was used as a baseline to evaluate two more sophisticated models, convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, and also evaluate an ensemble model featuring all three neural networks. Results ensemble model was able to achieve 73% testing accuracy for classifying the 16 top-level categories, outperforming all other models. The top model for classifying abstract grade was also an ensemble model, achieving a mean average error (MAE) of 1.01. Conclusion While the baseline BOW model was the highest performing individual classifier, ensemble models that included state-of-the-art neural networks were able to outperform it. Our research shows that machine learning techniques can, to a reasonable degree of accuracy, predict both objective factors such as abstract category as well as subjective factors such as abstract grade. This work builds upon previous research involving using natural language processing on scientific abstracts to make useful inferences that address a meaningful problem.


1955 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 223-237

Archibald Read Richardson was born on 21 August 1881 of English parents: he was the eldest of five children and was dearly loved by the whole family. The greater part of his life before he went to Swansea in 1920 was spent in London where he began his academic career in 1903 as an engineering student at the Royal College of Science. As a volunteer (probably under age) he had already served in the South African war, on one occasion during which members of his troop, although unable to swim, had to get their horses over the flooded Tugela river at midnight. His college course, 1903- 1907, was one of sustained distinction, and he developed an interest in pure mathematics which attracted the attention of his teachers, particularly of Professor L. N. G. Filon, who wished to appoint him forthwith to his staff as an assistant in mathematics. But Richardson, it would appear, was not yet a member of the University of London; and to become a lecturer required his passing the next matriculation examination: this done he was duly appointed. Three years later he obtained First Class Honours in the external examination. From 1912 to 1914 he was assistant professor in mathematics at the Imperial College, which had been formed by the amalgamation of the Royal College of Science, the Royal School of Mines, and the City and Guilds Engineering College. In August 1914 he left for war service and returned in April 1919. In August 1920 he became Professor of Aeronautical Science at the Cadet College, Cranwell; and shortly afterwards, in October 1920, he was appointed to the Chair of Mathematics in the University College of Swansea, the newly created constituent college of the University of Wales. This post he held for twenty years until he was compelled to resign in 1940 on account of increasing ill health, when he retired to Cape Town, but continued to prosecute research until shortly before his death in 1954. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1946.


2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-520
Author(s):  
R. G. HART ◽  
A. GUPTA ◽  
K. LYONS

There are currently 68 hand surgery fellowship programmes known to the authors in the United States and many more throughout the world. To our knowledge, there are no hand fellowships which focus on research. Such a hand surgery research fellowship is being developed to provide this training. This paper outlines the goals and objectives of the intended 2 year training programme and includes a description of the fellowship. The first year would be mostly committed to learning research methods and the second would be a clinical hand fellowship. This will combine clinical expertise in hand surgery, practical research experience and formal research training. Hand researchers would learn research methods, develop innovative research ideas and begin an active research and academic career.


Author(s):  
Reni Butler ◽  
Jiyon Lee ◽  
Regina J Hooley

Abstract Launching an academic career in breast imaging presents both challenges and opportunities for the newly graduated trainee. A strategic plan aligned with one’s personal strengths and interests facilitates career success and professional satisfaction. Academic departments offer multiple tracks to accommodate diverse faculty goals. The specific requirements of various tracks vary across institutions. The clinician-educator track typically encourages a focus on medical education and educational scholarship. The clinician-investigator or clinician-scholar track supports original research and grant-funded clinical trials. Finally, the clinical and clinician-administrator tracks allow for emphasis on clinical program development and leadership. As definitions of scholarship broaden, many opportunities are accessible to demonstrate excellence in the traditional areas of clinical practice, education, and research, as well as the broader fields of leadership and administration. Departmental and national society resources that advance knowledge in one’s chosen area of interest are available and should be explored. Mentorship and sponsorship can provide valuable insight into identifying such resources and devising a plan for sustainable career success and work-life integration.


Author(s):  
Crosbie Smith

Following some years of declining health, Professor Maurice Crosland passed away on 30 August 2020 at the age of eighty-nine. Author of four influential scholarly monographs, Maurice played major roles in the British Society for the History of Science during the 1960s and 1970s as an active Member of Council, Honorary Editor of the British Journal for the History of Science (1965–71) and Honorary President of the society (1974–6). His academic career began in 1963 with his appointment to a lectureship in the History & Philosophy of Science at the University of Leeds. In 1974 the by-then Reader in History of Science secured a £100,000 Nuffield Foundation Grant with which to establish, for the first time, a dedicated history-of-science group at the University of Kent at Canterbury. Appointed Professor of the History of Science and Director of the Unit for the History, Philosophy and Social Relations of Science (known as the ‘History of Science Unit’ or simply ‘the Unit’), his objectives during the five-year Nuffield-funded period were to focus on promoting the research activities of the new group, build up much-needed library resources in a university which was barely ten years old, and effect a transition to a research and teaching unit that would offer modules to undergraduates in each of the three principal faculties (Humanities, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences). His own research centred on French science during and after the Napoleonic period, with particular emphasis on the history of chemistry and the formal institutions and informal networks of Parisian science. In 1984 his work was recognized with the American Chemical Society's award of the Dexter Prize, a rare achievement for a British scholar.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Samantha L. Heller ◽  
Abbas Charlie ◽  
James S. Babb ◽  
Linda Moy ◽  
Yiming Gao

2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Maxwell ◽  
N.T. Ridley ◽  
G. Rubin ◽  
M.G. Wallis ◽  
F.J. Gilbert ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-117
Author(s):  
D. A. Barinov ◽  
◽  
V. A. Lebedev ◽  
◽  

The history of the Bolshevik party figured prominently in the reform of postrevolutionary Soviet science. After the Civil War, many revolutionaries who took accelerated special learning courses subsequently became professors and heads of newly organized academic institutions. Their aim was to prepare new ideologically strong specialists for the country. However, despite their considerable contribution to higher education in the prewar USSR, a significant number of “red professors” became victims of repression in the 1930s. Otto Augustovich Lidak — one of the main Leningrad historians of the Bolshevik party in the 1930s — was a bright representative of this generation. As a Bolshevik in the Civil war, he traveled from Lithuania to the Siberian city of Minusinsk and from Petrograd to Persia. Having all the necessary qualities (social background, revolutionary experience, connections, etc.), O. A. Lidak was able to build a successful academic career within a short period. At various times, he was the head of the Institute of History of the CPSU(b) and the Communist Institute of Journalism. He was also a professor in the Leningrad branch of the Communist Academy, Communist University, Leningrad State University. Finally, he was an active member of the Society of Marxist Historians, the Society of Former Political Prisoners and Exiles, etc. Thus, he was involved in the work of all the major party institutions that prepared “pro-Soviet” cadres. This article considers the milestones of Lidak’s biography and also explores his contribution to the historiography of the Russian Revolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document