scholarly journals THE PREDICTIVE UTILITY OF GRACE SCORE FOR OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH NON ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-243
Author(s):  
Haroon Ishaq ◽  
Bilal Akhtar ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Ghulam Shabbir Shar ◽  
Abdul Hakeem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Optimal Cutoff ◽  
Cutoff Value ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Grace Score

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of GRACE score for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the largest public sector cardiac care center of the Pakistan between January 2020 and June 2020. In this study, we included adult patients diagnosed with NSTEMI and correlation of GRACE score was assessed with angiographic finding of obstructive CAD defined as ≥50% stenosis in the left main or ≥70% stenosis in other coronary arteries. Results: A total of 227 patients were included in this study, out of whom 72.2% (164) were male patients and mean age was 55.77 ± 9.15 years. Mean GRACE score was found to be 95.89 ± 21.15. On coronary angiography obstructive CAD was present in 84.6% (192) of the patients. Area under the cure for predicting obstructive CAD was 0.669 [0.552 to 0.785]. The optimal cutoff value of GRACE score was ≥ 84 with sensitivity of 79.7% [73.3% to 85.1%] and specificity of 57.1% [39.3% to 73.7%]. GRACE score of ≥ 84 was found to be an independent predictor of obstructive CAD with odds ratio of 4.33 [1.61 - 11.64; p=0.004] adjusted for gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, family history of CAD, and smoking. Conclusion: GRACE score has a moderate predictive value in predicting obstructive CAD in patients with NSTEMI. The optimal cutoff value of 84 is an independent predictor with good sensitivity but moderate specificity in predicting obstructive CAD.

Abstract 273: Myocardial Infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Prevalence, Clinical Features and Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivabaskari Pasupathy ◽  
Rosanna Tavella ◽  
Margaret Arstall ◽  
Derek Chew ◽  
Matthew Worthley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Grace Score

Background: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an enigma that is being increasingly recognized with the frequent use of angiography following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). The current study is a prospective, contemporary analysis of MINOCA vs. Myocardial Infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) in regards to prevalence, clinical features, and in-hospital outcomes. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for AMI (as per the Third Universal AMI Definition) in South Australian public hospitals from January 2012 - December 2013 were included. Data was captured by Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia (CADOSA), a comprehensive registry compatible with the NCDR® CathPCI® Registry. The AMI patients were classified as MI-CAD or MINOCA on the basis of the presence or absence of a significant stenosis (≥50%) on angiography. Results: From 4,189 angiography procedures undertaken for AMI, 468 (11%) were classified as MINOCA. Patients with MINOCA were younger (59±15 vs. 64±13 years, p <0.01) and more likely to be female (53% vs. 26%, p <0.01), compared to those with MI-CAD. Age-adjusted analysis comparing patients with MINOCA to MI-CAD revealed differences in: (1) cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension (52% vs. 66%, p<0.01), diabetes (19% vs. 32%, p<0.01), dyslipidemia (46% vs. 62%, p<0.01), and current smoker status (27% vs. 37% p<0.01); (2) AMI type and size with fewer ST elevation myocardial infarcts (27% vs. 41%, p<0.01) and lower peak troponin values (180 ng/L, IQR 353 vs. 264 ng/L, IQR 680, p<0.01) amongst MINOCA patients. Furthermore, the GRACE Score for acute coronary syndrome risk stratification was lower for the MINOCA patients compared to MICAD (150±34 versus 160±35, p <0.01). Despite fewer cardiovascular risk factors, the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, smaller infarcts, and a lower GRACE score, the in-hospital mortality was similar for MINOCA and MI-CAD patients (2.2% vs. 3.0%, p=0.22). Moreover, MINOCA patients were less likely to receive secondary prevention therapies at discharge including antiplatelet therapy (60% vs. 92%, p<0.01) beta-blockers (41% vs. 65%, p<0.01), statin (55% vs. 88%, p<0.01), ACE-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (59% versus 81%, p<0.01), or referral to cardiac rehabilitation (15% versus 52%, p<0.01). Conclusions: In contemporary cardiology practice, MINOCA may be more frequent than previously appreciated and has a guarded prognosis despite its apparent lower risk profile. Improving the use of secondary prevention therapies in these patients may improve their prognosis.

scholarly journals OCT Findings in MINOCA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2759
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Bryniarski ◽  
Pawel Gasior ◽  
Jacek Legutko ◽  
Dawid Makowicz ◽  
Anna Kedziora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery Spasm ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Artery Dissection ◽  
Plaque Disruption ◽  
Artery Disease

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. It is a heterogenous entity with a number of possible etiologies that can be determined through the use of appropriate diagnostic algorithms. Common causes of a MINOCA may include plaque disruption, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary artery spasm, and coronary thromboembolism. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality which allows the differentiation of coronary tissue morphological characteristics including the identification of thin cap fibroatheroma and the differentiation between plaque rupture or erosion, due to its high resolution. In this narrative review we will discuss the role of OCT in patients presenting with MINOCA. In this group of patients OCT has been shown to reveal abnormal findings in almost half of the cases. Moreover, combining OCT with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was shown to allow the identification of most of the underlying mechanisms of MINOCA. Hence, it is recommended that both OCT and CMR can be used in patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to gain a better understanding of this condition and to provide optimal management while reducing morbidity and mortality in that subset patients.

Abstract 13804: Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries in Older Adults

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ara H Rostomian ◽  
Derek Q Phan ◽  
Mingsum Lee ◽  
Ray X Zadegan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Kaiser Permanente ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction: Myocardial Infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is found in 5%-6% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As such, the diagnosis and management of AMI patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) poses a challenge as compared to patients with MI with coronary artery disease (MICAD). Hypothesis: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of MINOCA in older patients as compared with MICAD patients, with and without revascularization. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients ≥80 years old who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for AMI between 2009-2019 at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center. MINOCA was defied as <50% stenosis of coronary arteries on angiography with a troponin level ≥0.05 ng/ml. Patients with MINOCA vs MICAD were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of MINOCA and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze all-cause mortality between cohorts. Results: A total of 259 patients with MINOCA (mean ± SD age 83.8±2.7 years, 68% female) and 687 patients with MICAD (84.7±3.4 years, 40% female) were analyzed. Younger age (odds ratio [OR]=1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.05-1.18), female sex (OR=3.14; CI=2.20-4.48), black race (OR=2.53; CI=1.61-3.98), no history of prior stroke (OR=1.56; CI=1.06-2.33), atrial fibrillation or flutter (OR=2.04; CI:1.38-3.02), lower troponin levels (OR=1.08; CI:1.03-1.11), and lower triglyceride levels per 10 mg/dl increments (OR=1.06; CI:1.03-1.11) increased the odds of having MINCOA as compared to MICAD. At median follow-up of 2.4 years, MINOCA was associated with a lower rate of death (44.8% vs 55.2%, p<0.01) compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but no difference (31.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.68) when compared to re-vascularized MICAD. Conclusions: Patients age ≥80 years with MINOCA have fewer traditional risk factors compared to their counterparts with MICAD and fewer deaths compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but similar mortality compared to revascularized MICAD

Comparison of the GRACE and TIMI Risk Scores in Predicting the Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with non STelevation Myocardial Infarction

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
Sharadindu Shekhar Roy ◽  
STM Abu Azam ◽  
Md Khalequzzaman ◽  
Mohammad Ullah ◽  
Samir Kumar Kundu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Timi Score ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Vessel Score ◽  
Grace Score

Background: The superiority of the GRACE and TIMI risk scores in predicting the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has not yet been established. This study was done to compare the GRACE and TIMI risk scores in predicting the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in this group of patients.Method: The cross sectional study done in the Department of Cardiology, NICVD, Dhaka. The patients admitted with NSTEMI were evaluated to calculate the GRACE and TIMI risk score from April, 2015 to April, 2016.Coronary angiogram was done during index hospitalization and the severity of the coronary artery disease was assessed by vessel score and Gensini score.Results: Of 115 patients assessed, a positive correlation of the vessel score and Gensini score was observed with both the GRACE and TIMI risk scores (p=<0.001) and the GRACE score (r=0.59) correlated better than the TIMI score (r=0.52). The GRACE score presented area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.844(95% CI = 0.774 – 0.914) significantly superior to the area under the ROC curve of 0.752(95% CI =0.658– 0.846) of the TIMI score for the difference between the two scores.Conclusion: Both the GRACE and TIMI scores had good predictive value in predicting the severity of coronary artery disease in the patients with NSTEMI but when both the scores were compared, the GRACE score was found to be superior and correlated better with the severity of coronary artery disease.Cardiovasc. j. 2017; 10(1): 45-51

Ischaemic heart disease in women

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2836-2840
Author(s):  
Martha Gulati
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Ischaemic Heart Disease ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Atypical Presentation ◽  
Artery Disease

The more atypical presentation of women makes the diagnostic evaluation of symptomatic women challenging and results in more frequent referral for diagnostic testing to improve the precision of the ischaemic heart disease likelihood estimate. The classification of ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction has moved beyond the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease and encompasses ischaemia that can occur in the presence and absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Consideration of the different pathophysiology of ischaemia that may occur in women needs to be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ischaemic heart disease in women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document