scholarly journals Correlation of serum microRNA-122 level with the levels of Alanine aminotransferase and HBV-DNA in Chronic HBV-infected patients

Author(s):  
Rana Tabar Asad Laleh ◽  
Zohreh Sharifi ◽  
Ali Akbar Pourfathollah
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jun Zhu ◽  
Xue-Hua Sun ◽  
Zheng-Hua Zhou ◽  
Shun-Qing Liu ◽  
Hua Lv ◽  
...  

Objective. To determine the efficacy and safety of Lingmao Formula combined with entecavir for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT).Methods. 301 patients were randomly assigned to receive Lingmao Formula combined with entecavir (treatment group) or placebo combined with entecavir (control group) for 52 weeks. The outcomes of interest included the reduction of serum HBV DNA level, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion, ALT normalization, and histological improvement.Results. The mean decrease of serum HBV DNA level from baseline and the percentage of patients who had reduction in serum HBV DNA level ≥2 lg copies/mL in treatment group were significantly greater than that in control group (5.5 versus 5.4 lg copies/mL,P=0.010; 98.5% versus 92.6%,P=0.019). The percentage of HBeAg loss in treatment group was 22.8%, which was much higher than a percentage of 12.6% in control group (P=0.038). There was no significant difference between the two groups in histological improvement. Safety was similar in the two groups.Conclusions. The combination of Lingmao Formula with entecavir could result in significant decrease of serum HBV DNA and increase of HBeAg loss for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with mildly elevated ALT without any serious adverse events. Clinical trial registration number isChiCTR-TRC-09000594.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1801-1801
Author(s):  
Blanca Sanchez-Gonzalez ◽  
Montserrat Garcia-Retortillo ◽  
Teresa Murcia ◽  
Mariana Ferraro ◽  
Francesc Garcia-Pallarols ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-recognized complication and is a potentially life-threatening condition in cancer patients with chronic HBV (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive). Rituximab has been associated with an increase in HBV reactivation in chronic HBV patients (45%) and even in patients with resolved infection (HBsAg negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive (22%); however, the reported frequency varies among different studies. Current guidelines for management of chronic HBV recommend routine antiviral HBV prophylaxis with lymphoma before starting chemotherapy. In contrast, there is little evidence-based consensus regarding patients with resolved HBV infection. Aim: To analyze the incidence of HBV reactivation and the role of antiviral HBV prophylaxis in lymphoma patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV treated with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy managed according to our institutional HBV guidelines. Secondary endpoints were to analyze the incidence of HBV in this population and HBV guidelines adherence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Lymphoma patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV in a single center. HBV viral status definitions: Active Chronic HBV infection: HBsAg positive, anti-HBc positive and HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL; Inactive Carriers: HBsAg positive, Anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA undetectable or <2000 IU/mL with normal transaminases; Resolved HBV: HBsAg negative, anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA undetectable. HBV reactivation was defined as increased serum HBV DNA (≥1 log10), regardless of liver biochemistry or HBsAg status. Institutional HBV guidelines: serum samples were collected at baseline for HBsAg and anti-HBc testing in all lymphoma patients. Patients were evaluated by a hepatologist if any of them fulfilled HBV viral status definition. Baseline at screening and monitoring every 3 months during therapy and up to 24 months after completing therapy (assessment of liver biochemistry, serum HBV DNA, HBsAg and anti-HBs levels). Specific prophylaxis strategies according to HBV status: Group A (Active chronic HBV): treatment for HBV; Group B (Inactive carriers): antiviral HBV prophylaxis; Group C (Resolved HBV): antiviral HBV prophylaxis if rituximab containing-therapy or follow-up only if rituximab-free therapy. HBV antiviral prophylaxis was started before therapy and finished 12 months after completing therapy. RESULTS From January 2012 to January 2015, 227 lymphoma patients received chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy. 142 (63%) patients received rituximab-containing therapy. 43 (19%) patients were anti-HBc positive. Group A: 2 (1%) patients; Group B: 2 (1%) patients; Group C: 39 (17%) patients. 14 (6%) patients have coinfection with hepatitis C virus and 12 (5%) patients co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Adherence to HBV guidelines was 90%. Patients in Group A (n=2) and B (n=2) received antiviral treatment/prophylaxis before starting therapy. In the Group C, 16 (41%) patients underwent only follow-up and 23 (59%) patients received HBV antiviral prophylaxis (lamivudine in 4, entecavir in 8 and tenofovir in 11). Median duration of HBV prophylaxis was 18 months (95% CI: 16-19 months). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 2 patients developed HBV reactivation during lymphoma treatment: 1 from group B (reactivation rate of 50%) and 1 from group C (reactivation rate of 3%). Both patients had received rituximab-containing treatment and both developed HBV reactivation (without hepatitis flare) within the first 6 months after finishing antiviral HBV prophylaxis (delayed HBV reactivation). Outcome was favorable in both patients. Characteristics of HBV reactivation patients are shown in table I. Cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation at 12 and 24 months were 0% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our strategy of close monitoring patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV that receive chemotherapy and adding antiviral HBV prophylaxis only in selected patients clearly decrease HBV reactivation. Nevertheless, this strategy may not fully protect patients from late HBV reactivations. Larger validation studies are needed to confirm our data and to establish the best cost-effective strategy in this lymphoma population, especially in the new era of inmunomodulatory drugs of their real involvement in HBV reactivation is unknown. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Wang ◽  
Yunxia Zhu ◽  
Qiumei Pang ◽  
Ran Li ◽  
Hua Zhang

Abstract Background: Little data exist regarding the comparison of efficacy and safety between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and Telbivudine (LdT) in late pregnancy on preventing hepatitis B mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in real-world settings. Methods: We retrospectively included HB-s antigen (HBsAg) positive mothers with HBV DNA ≥2*105IU/mL to receive TDF or LdT after gestational weeks 24~32 weeks. All infants received standard immunoprophylaxis. Primary outcomes were MTCT rates at infants’ age of 52 weeks and safety of TDF or LdT use. Secondary outcomes were the decline of HBV-DNA levels at delivery and rates of on-treatment and off-treatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation>2 upper limits of normal (ULN) during the study.Results: Of 1407 women, 209 received TDF and 1198 received LdT treatment. There were no differences between mean duration of TDF and LdT treatment (TDF vs. LdT: 11.76±2.20 weeks vs 11.64±2.79 weeks, p>0.05). At birth, 213 (9.8%) infants in the TDF-group were HBsAg positive, lower than 1180 (20.8%) in the LdT-group (p<0.001). Among 1405 infants (TDF/LdT=213/1192) of the 1385 (TDF/LdT=205/1180) women completed the 52-weeks study, intention‐to‐treat analysis indicated 1 (0.5 %) (1 infant was lost to follow-up) in TDF treated mothers and 3(0.3 %) in LDT treated mothers (3 infants were lost to follow-up). There was no difference between TDF group and LdT (p=0.483). On-treatment analysis indicated 0% HBsAg positive infants in the two groups (p=1.0). Levels of HBV-DNA decline in TDF-treated mothers were observed comparable to LdT-treated mothers (4.05±0.93 log10IU/mlvs.3.99±1.30 log10IU/ml, p=0.499). TDF-treated mothers had complained more symptoms of the digestive system and less arthralgia than LdT-treated mothers. All adverse events of two groups were grade I-II. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation(>2ULN) in TDF-treated mothers were lower in TDF-treated mothers than LdT-treated mothers (7.3% vs.15.7%, p<0.05). Alanine aminotransferase flares in TDF-treated mothers were observed lower than LdT-treated mothers (7.3% vs.15.7%, p< 0.05).Conclusions: TDF and LdT use in late pregnancy for highly viremic mothers was equally effective in reducing MTCT. Although complained more digestive system symptoms, TDF treated mothers had fewer ALT abnormalities than LdT.


1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 953-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Roingeard ◽  
Frédéric Dubois ◽  
Yannick Bacq ◽  
Francis Barin ◽  
Alain Goudeau

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-5
Author(s):  
Dipendra Khadka ◽  
Sudhamshu KC ◽  
Niyanta Karki ◽  
Sandip Khadka ◽  
Kiran Regmi

Introduction: Hepatitis B infection is a global problem. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection related liver disease is also not an uncommon problem in our country too. Reports regarding pattern of chronic HBV infection are also lacking. The aim of the present study was to determine the spectrum of chronic HBV infection among patients attending the liver clinic in a tertiary care center. Method: A hospital based descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in Liver unit of Nepalgunj Medical College, Kohalpur, from April 2018 to November 2018. All patients with HBsAg positive were further tested for HBeAg, HBeAb, HBV DNA quantitative and liver function test. Ultrasound examination was advised for any evidence of chronic liver disease. Staging was done according to viral serology, liver biochemistry and ultrasonography of liver Results: Total patients enrolled were 119. Majority of patents were in between 30-60 years (51.3%) with male predominance 59.7%. Most of patients were in the stage of HBeAg negative chronic infection 66.4% with normal transaminase and HBV DNA <2000 IU/ML. Majority of patients having unknown source of infection 90.8%. Incidental detection (67.2%) was common mode of detection. Conclusions: Majority of patients were in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B infection phase with normal transaminase and low HBV DNA not requiring treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document