Strategic planning of measures to prevent illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues in the Russian Federation: results and novelties of the new decade

2021 ◽  
pp. 255-257
Author(s):  
Anna Igorevna BALANDINA
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Illicit Trafficking ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

A criminal profiling of persons convicted for narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Pavlik ◽  
Elena Ketenchieva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Leningrad Region ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Drug Offenders ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Profile ◽  
Illicit Trafficking ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

This article provides a classification and characteristics of persons convicted for crimes in the field of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking. The article deals with the statistics in this sphere over the past five years. Based on the collected empirical evidence the authors analyzed the qualitative indicators of convicted drug offenders. The examination of statistical data from investigative and judicial practice on crimes in the field of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances illicit trafficking made it possible to sketch a criminal profile of a person sentenced to imprisonment: a citizen of the Russian Federation, a male between 18 to 39 years, having a secondary general or vocational education. Moreover, the personality of a convicted person is characterized by his internal criteria deformation devaluing the norms and rules that express and consolidate public interests. The authors also conducted a comparative analysis of offenders convicted both in the Russian Federation and in such federal subjects as Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad region. The choice of St. Petersburg as one of the objects of this research is justified by the fact that it has been among the leaders of the regions with the largest number of recorded drug-related crimes for several years.

The public danger and qualification problems of illegal sale of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the prisons

2019 ◽  
pp. 60-68
Author(s):  
Марина Сергеевна Красильникова
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Narcotic Drug ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Illicit Trafficking ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

В статье актуализируется необходимость исследования вопросов квалификации незаконного сбыта наркотических средств и психотропных веществ в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы. Представлены и проанализированы статистические данные, иллюстрирующие сложившуюся криминальную ситуацию в сфере незаконного оборота наркотических средств и психотропных веществ, а также примеры из судебной практики, порождающие немало вопросов. Среди уголовно-правовых проблем, связанных с незаконным оборотом наркотических средств и психотропных веществ, особо выделяются проблемы квалификации незаконного сбыта наркотиков, а также особенности юридической оценки такого сбыта, совершенного сотрудником пенитенциарного учреждения. Для решения обозначенной проблемы приведены руководящие разъяснения высшей судебной инстанции по данной категории дел, мнения ученых-юристов, тщательно изучены теоретические и практические аспекты тематики. На основе проведенного анализа установлено, что оценка деяния сотрудника учреждения уголовно-исполнительной системы, выразившегося в приобретении для осужденного или заключенного под стражу наркотического средства или психотропного вещества, как пособничества в приобретении наркотика без цели сбыта не соответствует смыслу закона, противоречит рекомендациям Пленума Верховного суда РФ, имеет не свойственную для приобретения без цели сбыта крайне высокую степень общественной опасности, а также дает возможность освобождения от уголовной ответственности. В завершение исследования подведены его итоги, подчеркнута необходимость пересмотра разъяснений Верховного суда Российской Федерации по данной категории дел, а также серьезной переработки уголовно-правовых норм об ответственности за незаконный сбыт наркотических средств и психотропных веществ. The article actualizes the need to study the criminal law aspects of the illegal sale of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in penitentiary institutions. Statistical data are presented and analyzed to illustrate the current criminal situation in the field of illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as well as examples from judicial practice that raise many questions. Among the criminal law problems associated with the illicit trafficking of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the problems of qualifying illegal drug trafficking, as well as the peculiarities of the legal assessment of such a sale made by a penitentiary institution employee, are especially highlighted. To solve the indicated problem, the leading explanations of the highest court on this category of cases, the opinions of legal scholars are given, the theoretical and practical aspects of the topic are carefully studied. Based on the analysis, it was found that the assessment of the act of an employee of the penitentiary system, expressed in the acquisition of a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance for a convicted or imprisoned person, as aiding in the purchase of a drug without a sale purpose does not correspond to the meaning of the law, contradicts the recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has an extremely high degree of social danger, which is not typical for acquiring without a marketing objective, and also makes it possible to exempt from criminal No responsibility. At the end of the study, its results were summarized, the need to review the clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on this category of cases, as well as a serious revision of criminal law on liability for the illegal sale of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, was emphasized.

scholarly journals ACTIVITIES OF THE ANTI-DRUG COMMISSIONS OF THE SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AS AN ELEMENT OF THE SYSTEM OF CONTROL OVER THE TURNOVER OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (53) ◽  
pp. 145-152
Author(s):  
 I. A. Dvoymenny ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Effective Feedback ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
Functional Methods ◽  
Scope Of Application ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
And Control ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

Subject. Control over the turnover of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Russian Federation. Topic. Problematic aspects of control over the turnover of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Goals. Analysis of the management and control system in the sphere of trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Russian Federation. Methodology. The methodological basis is a complex, systematic, activity-based, situational, structural and functional methods. Results. The problematic aspects of control over the turnover of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the subjects of the Russian Federation are identified and options for its further improvement are proposed. Scope of application. Improving the drug control system in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Conclusions. It is necessary to create a permanent scientific and methodological platform that generates comprehensive proposals for improving anti-drug legislation across the country, with an effective feedback mechanism with partners and direct contacts with the legislative bodies. Keywords: anti-drug commissions of the subjects of the Russian Federation, control over the turnover of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, anti-drug policy

Accounting of public danger of crime in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances at assignment of punishment

2019 ◽  
pp. 30-40
Author(s):  
Евгения Сергеевна Витовская
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Protection ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Illicit Trafficking

Статья посвящена проблеме учета общественной опасности преступления в сфере незаконного оборота наркотических средств и психотропных веществ при назначении наказания. Рассмотрены различные позиции ученых по вопросу критериев, определяющих общественную опасность совершенного преступления. Отмечается, что происходит формирование нового взгляда на содержание общественной опасности преступного деяния. Автор придерживается позиции, которая включает в содержание общественной опасности преступного деяния вредоносность и прецедентность, показателями такой опасности выступают ее характер и степень. Вредоносность обусловлена прежде всего уровнем наркотизации населения, позволяющим оценить совокупность наступивших негативных последствий приспособительного и преобразовательного свойства наркопреступности. Характеризуя прецедентность, следует иметь в виду оценку наркоситуации, которая проявляется в возможности ее повторяемости и несет свойства человеческой практики. Специфика общественной опасности преступления в сфере незаконного оборота наркотических средств и психотропных веществ определена ее характером и степенью. Обращается особое внимание на то, что характер общественной опасности определен через объект уголовно-правовой охраны. Общественные отношения, охраняющие здоровье населения, определяют социальную сущность преступления в сфере незаконного оборота наркотических средств и психотропных веществ, выступают основанием уголовной ответственности, служат основанием для классификации преступлений. Приводятся статистические показатели различных структур, характеризующие здоровье населения и ситуацию в сфере незаконного наркооборота. Обращается внимание на то, что содержание общественной опасности должно быть закреплено не в постановлении Пленума Верховного суда РФ, а на законодательном уровне, что позволит совершенствовать уголовное законодательство и практику его применения. The article is devoted to a problem of accounting of public danger of crime in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances at assignment of punishment. The author considers various positions of scientists on the criteria defining public danger of the committed crime. It is noted that there is a formation of a new view on the content of public danger of criminal action. The author adheres to a position which includes injuriousness and a pretsedentnost in the content of public danger of criminal action, its character and degree act as indicators of such danger. The injuriousness is caused first of all by the population narcotization level allowing to estimate set of the come negative consequences of adaptive and converting property of narcocrime. Characterizing a pretsedentnost, it must be kept in mind assessment of a drug abuse situation which is shown in a possibility of its repeatability and bears properties of human practice. The specifics of public danger of crimes in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances are defined by its character and degree. Special attention that the nature of public danger is defined through object of criminal protection is paid. The public relations protecting health of the population define social essence of crimes in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances, act as the basis of criminal liability, form the basis for classification of crimes. The statistics of various structures characterizing health of the population and a situation in the sphere of an illegal narcoturn are given. The author pays attention that the content of public danger has to be enshrined not in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and at the legislative level that will allow to improve the criminal legislation and practice of its application.danger of crimes in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances at assignment of punishment. The author considers various positions of scientists on the criteria defining the nature of public danger of the committed crime. It is noted that there is a formation of a new view on the content of nature of public danger of criminal action. Special attention that in the existing resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation «About practice of appointment of criminal penalty as courts of the Russian Federation» the nature of public danger is defined through object of criminal protection is paid. The public relations protecting health of the population define social essence of crimes in the sphere of illicit trafficking in drugs and psychotropic substances, act as the basis of criminal liability, form the basis for classification of crimes. The statistics of various structures characterizing health of the population and a situation in the sphere of an illegal narcoturn are given. The author pays attention that the content of nature of public danger has to be enshrined not in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and at the legislative level that will allow to improve the criminal legislation and practice of its application.

Limits of punishability of theft of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances

2019 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Беларева
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Uniform System ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
Official Position ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Broad Interpretation ◽  
The One ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

В статье рассматриваются вопросы влияния формы хищения, его квалифицирующих признаков на определение законодателем пределов наказуемости хищения наркотических средств. Автор выделил некоторые недостатки, допущенные при конструировании уголовно-правовой нормы, предусматривающей ответственность за хищение наркотических средств. В статье рассмотрены некоторые конкретные ситуации, демонстрирующие парадоксальность решения законодателя отказаться от конкретизации форм хищения при квалификации по ст. 229 УК РФ и установить единую систему квалифицирующих признаков для всех способов изъятия наркотических средств. Критическую оценку получило расширительное толкование Верховным судом РФ квалифицирующего признака «с использованием служебного положения». С одной стороны, такое понимание данного признака ставит под сомнение возможность квалификации по ч. 1 ст. 229 УК РФ хищения наркотических средств в форме присвоения или растраты, поскольку сразу переводит на квалификацию по п. «в» ч. 2 ст. 229 УК РФ. С другой стороны, при таком подходе присвоение и растрата наркотических средств становятся более опасным хищением, чем открытый ненасильственный грабеж. Автор также отмечает, что возможности суда по учету степени общественной опасности хищения наркотических средств в форме разбоя существенно ограничены. Единые пределы наказуемости не позволяют в должной мере учесть признаки, повышающие степень опасности такого хищения. Автор приходит к выводу, что ст. 229 УК РФ нуждается в корректировке, как в части формулирования диспозиций, так и в части пересмотра санкций, с учетом существенно различающегося характера и степени общественной опасности предусмотренных в ней деяний. The article deals with the influence of the form of theft, its qualifying features on the determination by the legislator of the limits of punishability of theft of narcotic drugs. The author highlighted some shortcomings in the construction of criminal law, providing for liability for theft of drugs. The article deals with some specific situations that demonstrate the paradoxical decision of the legislator to refuse to specify the forms of theft in the qualification of Art. 229 of the Criminal Code and to establish a uniform system of qualifying signs for all seizures of narcotic drugs. Critical assessment received broad interpretation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation qualifying feature “using official position”. On the one hand, this understanding of this feature casts doubt on the possibility of qualification under part 1 of article 229 of the criminal code of theft of drugs in the form of appropriation or embezzlement, as immediately translates to the qualification under pt. 2 of Art. 229 of the Criminal Code. On the other hand, with this approach, the appropriation and embezzlement of drugs become more dangerous theft than open nonviolent robbery. The author also notes that the court's ability to take into account the degree of public danger of theft of drugs in the form of robbery is significantly limited. Uniform limits of punishability do not allow to take into account properly the signs increasing degree of danger of such plunder. The analysis of questions of punishability of theft of narcotic drugs convinces that Art. 229 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation needs correction, both regarding formulation of dispositions, and regarding revision of sanctions, taking into account essentially differing character and degree of public danger of the acts provided in it.

scholarly journals Criminal-legal counteraction to illegal trafficking of narcotic and psychotropic substances in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-E) ◽  
pp. 219-233
Author(s):  
Dina Alontseva ◽  
Olga Lavrishcheva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Drug Trafficking ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Illegal Drug ◽  
Dialectical Method ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Illicit Trafficking

The article substantiates that the existing nationwide system of countering illegal drug trafficking (including psychotropic substances) in Russia needs to be re-evaluated and improved considering the changing situation. The methodological basis of the research was made up of general scientific, private and special methods of cognition. The general scientific dialectical method allowed us to consider the problem of legal relations arising in the field of legal regulation of countering crimes in the field of illicit trafficking in narcotic and psychotropic substances. On the basis of the conducted research, modern general social, individual and special criminological measures were developed to prevent crimes related to illegal (illegal) drug trafficking (including psychotropic substances), the use of which together will lay the foundation for the harmonization of existing domestic legislative acts in order to increase the level of coherence in the actions of state authorities in this area.

scholarly journals SUBJECT OF CRIMES PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLES 228, 228.1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: GENERAL PROVISIONS

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
I.A. Anisimova ◽  
A.V. Anisimov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Psychotropic Substances ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

The article deals with the debatable issues of the general criminal law characteristic of the subject ofdrug-related crimes. The meaning and place of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and plant-baseddrugs referred to in articles 228 and 228.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the crime aredetermined on the basis of the provisions of the study on the subject of the crime. The reasonable conclusionis that these drugs, substances and plant-based drugs belong to the subject of the crime as a separate sign ofcorpus delicti. Views on the definition and signs of the subject of drug-related crimes are summarized. Thecontent of the signs of the subject of crimes under articles 228 and 228.1 of the Criminal Code of the RussianFederation is specified. The problem of the terminological designation of the subject of the crime is raisedin articles 228 and 228.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document