Nieuwe richtlijnen 2021 voor cardiopulmonale reanimatie bij volwassenen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. WYFFELS ◽  
J. KLEIN OVINK ◽  
PH. DEWOLF
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
The Internet ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
Erc Guidelines

New guidelines 2021 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. In March 2021, the new European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were presented in Antwerp (Belgium). Every 5 years, these guidelines are renewed. They are based on the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2020 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR). In this manuscript, the most important aspects of these guidelines are summarized. Furthermore, the changes with regard to the guidelines of 2015 are emphasized. Basic life support (BLS), advanced life support (ALS) and post-resuscitation care are discussed. The 2021 guidelines can be downloaded from the internet (http://www.erc.edu).

scholarly journals European Resuscitation Council guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support changes related to the guidelines 2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (18) ◽  
pp. 298-303
Author(s):  
Srđan Nikolovski ◽  
Lovćenka Čizmović
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
High Heart Rate ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Skilled Operator ◽  
New Guidelines

Adult advanced life support guidelines 2021 provided by the European Resuscitation Council in its largest extent do not differ significantly from equivalent guidelines published six years ago. However, some important points were further emphasized, and some protocols show new additions and structural changes. According to the new guidelines, there is a greater recognition that patients with both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have premonitory signs, and that many of these arrests may be preventable. High-quality chest compressions with minimal interruption, early defibrillation, and treatment of reversible causes remained high priority steps in resuscitation process. New guidelines also recommend that, if an advanced airway is required, rescuers with a high tracheal intubation success rate should use this technique. With regard to using diagnostic procedures, medications, and special methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, newest guidelines also made new suggestions. According to these guidelines, when adrenaline is used, it should be used as soon as possible when the cardiac arrest rhythm is non-shockable, and after three defibrillation attempts for a shockable cardiac arrest rhythm. The guidelines recognise the increasing role of point-of-care ultrasound in peri-arrest care for diagnosis, but emphasis that it requires a skilled operator, and the need to minimise interruptions during chest compression. Additionally, 2015 guidelines suggested use of point-of-care ultrasound in diagnosing several various conditions with potential of causing cardiac arrest. However, 2021 guidelines limited indications in diagnosing only cardiac causes, such as tamponade or pneumothorax. The guidelines also reflect the increasing evidence for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a rescue therapy for selected patients with cardiac arrest when conventional advanced life support measures are failing or to facilitate specific interventions. Additionally, newest guidelines made significant changes in the order of steps used in the In/hospital resuscitation algorithm, as well as changes in several very important steps of treating tachycardias and high heart rate associated arrhythmias.

scholarly journals 2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myra H. Wyckoff ◽  
Eunice M. Singletary ◽  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Theresa M. Olasveengen ◽  
Robert Greif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Task Forces ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
Cardiovascular Care

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

scholarly journals Európai Újraélesztési Társaság (ERC) 2021. évi, az emeltszintű újraélesztésről (ALS) és periarrest ritmuszavarok ellátásáról szóló ajánlásának összefoglaló bemutatása

2022 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 23-35
Author(s):  
Balázs Tóth ◽  
Attila Pandur ◽  
József Betlehem ◽  
Gábor Priskin ◽  
Bence Schiszler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Liaison Committee

Jelen referátum célja az Európai Újraélesztési Társaság (European Resuscitation Council, ERC) 2021-ben megjelent(1), a periarrest időszak ellátását is magában foglaló emelt szintű újraélesztési protokolljának összefoglaló bemutatása, hangsúlyozva a korábbi, 2015-ben kiadott protokoll(2) ajánlásaitól való eltéréseket. Az életet veszélyeztető ritmuszavarok azonnali azonosítása és kezelése alapvető jelentőségű a keringésmegállás megelőzésében, illetve ismétlődésének elkerülése érdekében. A 2021-ben, az ERC által kiadott protokoll igazán jelentős változást a periarrest  achycard ritmuszavarok ellátási algoritmusában hozott. Az ellátás főbb terápiás vonala, a korábbi guideline-nal megegyezően, továbbra is a beteg állapotának stabilitása/instabilitása alapján kerül felosztásra. Az emelt szintű újraélesztés (Advanced Life Support – ALS) többlet beavatkozásokkal kiterjesztett alapszintű újraélesztés (Basic Life Support – BLS). Az ajánlás részletesen taglalja a kórházon belüli és kívüli keringésmegállást, az ezek ellátási lépéseit tartalmazó ALSalgoritmust, a kardiopulmonáris reszuszcitáció (CPR) során végzett légútbiztosítást, gyógyszeres terápiát és annak menedzselését. Ezen irányelvek a Nemzetközi Reszuszcitációs Bizottság (International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation – ILCOR ) által  meghatározott ellátási renden alapulnak(3).

Resuscitation on the field: basic and advanced life support and automatic external defibrillators

2019 ◽  
pp. 403-410
Author(s):  
Mark S. Link ◽  
Mark Estes III
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
Screening Strategy ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Playing Field

Resuscitation on the playing field is at least as important as screening in the prevention of death. Even if a screening strategy is largely effective, individuals will suffer sudden cardiac arrests. Timely recognition of a cardiac arrest with rapid implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and deployment and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) will save lives. Basic life support, including CPR and AED use, should be a requirement for all those involved in sports, including athletes. An emergency action plan is important in order to render advanced cardiac life support and arrange for transport to medical centres.

scholarly journals 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Ian Maconochie ◽  
Myra H. Wyckoff ◽  
Theresa M. Olasveengen ◽  
Eunice M. Singletary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Life Support ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Task Forces ◽  
Liaison Committee ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Cardiovascular Care

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

scholarly journals Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (16_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Berg ◽  
Jasmeet Soar ◽  
Lars W. Andersen ◽  
Bernd W. Böttiger ◽  
Sofia Cacciola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Cardiovascular Care

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations for advanced life support includes updates on multiple advanced life support topics addressed with 3 different types of reviews. Topics were prioritized on the basis of both recent interest within the resuscitation community and the amount of new evidence available since any previous review. Systematic reviews addressed higher-priority topics, and included double-sequential defibrillation, intravenous versus intraosseous route for drug administration during cardiac arrest, point-of-care echocardiography for intra-arrest prognostication, cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism, postresuscitation oxygenation and ventilation, prophylactic antibiotics after resuscitation, postresuscitation seizure prophylaxis and treatment, and neuroprognostication. New or updated treatment recommendations on these topics are presented. Scoping reviews were conducted for anticipatory charging and monitoring of physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Topics for which systematic reviews and new Consensuses on Science With Treatment Recommendations were completed since 2015 are also summarized here. All remaining topics reviewed were addressed with evidence updates to identify any new evidence and to help determine which topics should be the highest priority for systematic reviews in the next 1 to 2 years.

scholarly journals New guidelines for resuscitation in adults

Medicina ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Dinas Vaitkaitis ◽  
Vidas Pilvinis ◽  
Andrius Pranskūnas ◽  
Nedas Jasinskas ◽  
Paulius Dobožinskas
Keyword(s):  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Resuscitation Guidelines ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
Cardiovascular Care ◽  
Foreign Body Airway Obstruction ◽  
External Defibrillator

Five years after the last issue of the guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, in 2005 American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council published new guidelines. In this review, basic life support (BLS) technique, indications for use of an automated external defibrillator (AED), recognition of sudden cardiac arrest, and management of choking (foreign-body airway obstruction) are presented according to the “Resuscitation Guidelines 2005.”

Meta-analysis of the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H Ebell ◽  
Akke Vellinga ◽  
Siobhan Masterson ◽  
Phillip Yun
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Low Rate

BackgroundOur objective was to perform a systematic review of studies reporting the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules (TORRs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).MethodsWe performed a comprehensive search of the literature for studies evaluating the accuracy of TORRs, with two investigators abstracting relevant data from each study regarding study design, study quality and the accuracy of the TORRs. Bivariate meta-analysis was performed using the mada procedure in R.ResultsWe identified 14 studies reporting the performance of 9 separate TORRs. The sensitivity (proportion of eventual survivors for whom the TORR recommends resuscitation and transport) was generally high: 95% for the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) TORR, 97% for the basic life support (BLS) TORR and 99% for the advanced life support (ALS) TORR. The BLS and ERC TORR were more specific, which would lead to fewer futile transports, and all three of these TORRs had a miss rate of ≤0.13% (defined as a case where a patient is recommended for termination but survives). The pooled proportion of patients for whom each rule recommends TOR was much higher for the ERC and BLS TORRs (93.5% and 74.8%, respectively) than for the ALS TORR (29.0%).ConclusionsThe BLS and ERC TORRs identify a large proportion of patients who are candidates for termination of resuscitation following OHCA while having a very low rate of misclassifying eventual survivors (<0.1%). Further prospective validation of the ERC TORR and direct comparison with BLS TORR are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document