scholarly journals Decision Support System On Court Judge Lubukpakam Method Using SAW (Simple Additive weighting)

Author(s):  
Diana Sari Muliani Saragih ◽  
Penda Sudarto Hasugian

In the legal world, especially in trials that took place in the Court, the law is the most important system in the implementation of a series of institutional strength.The cornerstone of judicial justice in Indonesia is based on Pancasila and the human dignity and the protection of human rights guarantees contained in Law No. 8 In 1981 the Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Procedure Code).Various studies have been conducted to assist in the termination of a case, as is done by Rumodar RF et al (2016) on the use of one of the MADM method, namely Simple Additive weighting. The analysis result is a system that can display information on article associated with a form of crime that is done that ensnared or incriminate the perpetrator, the system will also feature a sanction that is given of each chapter are violated.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Agung Mustakim

ABSTRAKHak tersangka perkara penyalahgunaan Narkoba untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum dalam proses penyidikan merupakan asas dan komponen penting dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang dapat melindungi hak asasi tersangka dalam pelaksanaan proses peradilan yang tidak memihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, memahami dan mengkaji apakah bantuan hukum wajib diberikan kepada tersangka penyalahgunaan Narkoba dalam proses penyidikan sebagai perlindungan HAM, dan mengkaji bagaimanakah fungsi advokat menurut UU No. 18 Tahun 2003 dihubungkan dengan kewajiban memberikan bantuan hukum kepada tersangka perkara penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Spesifikasi penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, guna memberikan gambaran tentang hak tersangka untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum dalam proses penyidikan dan fungsi advokat serta kewajibannya memberikan bantuan hukum kepada tesangka penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah normatif kualitatif yaitu pemaparan dan penggambaran pengaturan perundang-undangan secara kualitatif yuridis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, bantuan hukum masih sekedar hak bukan kewajiban, padahal bantuan hukum bersifat imperatif dan sebagai perlindungan HAM karenanya bila bantuan hukum tidak diberikan adalah bertentangan dengan KUHAP, kemudian dengan tidak adanya sanksi atau lemahnya aturan hukum karena kepada penegak hukum yang lalai dan menghindar untuk tidak memberikan hak tersangka untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum padahal ancaman hukuman diatas lima tahun dengan adanya surat pernyataan tersangka yang dibuat penyidik.  ABSTRACTThe right of suspects in drug abuse cases to obtain legal assistance in the investigation process is an important principle and component of the criminal justice system that can protect the suspect's human rights in the implementation of an impartial judicial process. This study aims to find out, understand and examine whether legal aid must be given to suspects of drug abuse in the investigation process as a protection of human rights, and to examine how the function of advocates according to Law no. 18 of 2003 is related to the obligation to provide legal assistance to suspects in drug abuse cases. The specifications of this research are descriptive and analytical, in order to provide an overview of the rights of suspects to obtain legal assistance in the investigation process and the function of advocates and their obligations to provide legal assistance to suspected drug abusers. The data analysis technique used is normative qualitative, namely the presentation and description of legal arrangements in a qualitative juridical manner. According to the study's findings, legal aid is still just a right, not an obligation, even though it is an imperative and a protection of human rights; if legal aid is not provided, it is contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code, in the absence of sanctions or weak legal rules due to negligent law enforcers, and avoiding giving the suspect the right to obtain legal assistance; if legal aid is not provided, it is contrary to the Criminal Procedure Code, in the absence of sanctions or weak legal rules due to negligent law enforce.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (42) ◽  
pp. 236-247
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Bazhenova ◽  
Anatolii Desyatnik ◽  
Hanna Mudretska ◽  
Inna Pakipova

The article is devoted to the study of certain issues of property detection in the institution of seizure of property. On the basis of comparative legal analysis, the possibility of ensuring the detection of property using search and seizure within the Criminal Procedure Code of the past and modern Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and foreign countries was assessed. The rights of the victim under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are analyzed in terms of his/her right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law to decide his/her civil rights and obligations. The application of the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine is analyzed taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of human rights in relation to the rights of individuals or legal entities to peacefully own their property. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the previous provisions do not in any way restrict the right of the state to enact such laws as it deems necessary to exercise control over the use of property in accordance with the general interest. Scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, formal-legal and comparative-legal method became the methodological basis of the research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trần Thu Hạnh

Based on the Constitution of 2013, the Criminal Procedure Code in 2015 has paid special attention to the respect and protection of Human Rights in trial process. Being the core activity of the criminal procedure, the trial process demonstrates profoundly policies of the Human Rights protection in Vietnam. Thus, this article uses a rights based approach to analyze the aspect of human rights protection through provisions on trial phase in the Criminal Procedure Code. These are regulations on objectives, principles of the Criminal Procedure Code, the trial procedure and other relevant provisions. Keywords: Criminal proceduce, judge, human rights, Criminal proceduce code 2015


2020 ◽  
pp. 252-261
Author(s):  
O. Mazur

The article deals with the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights regarding evidence and evidence, which are disclosed in the provision of paragraph 3 of Article 6 “The right to a fair trial” of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the latest practice of the Supreme Court regarding the criteria for admissibility of evidence and analysis of the current criminal procedural law. As you know, the attitude of the state towards the protection of human rights and freedoms is one of the indicators of its democracy. Ukraine has chosen the European Community as the main strategic vector of development. Such a vector provides for the unification of the regulatory framework in accordance with European legislation, as well as compliance by law enforcement agencies with international standards for the protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens. That is why, the corresponding rule is enshrined in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, providing that the rule of law in criminal proceedings is applied taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (part 2 of article 8). A detailed analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine regarding the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings and the relationship of these norms with the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights is carried out. They also examined the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the admissibility of evidence in decisions in which a violation by the state of the norms of the Convention was found, and in decisions in which such a violation was not found. So, summarizing and analyzing the practice of the ECHR, we saw that the Court emphasizes that a guilty verdict cannot be generally based only on inadmissible evidence, and if such a sentence is pronounced, then this is a violation of Article 1 6 of the Convention in respect of an unfair trial. Therefore, the investigator, prosecutor, investigating judge and judge should take into account the relevant practice of the ECHR and the norms of the Convention in their procedural activities in order to avoid these violations and to submit complaints to the European Court of Human Rights in the future.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Handri Wirastuti Sawitri

Suspect in custody who experience severe pain, must be doing maintenance by the investigator as the officers responsible for detention. Based on the implementation of research results “pembantaran” arrest suspects in the level of investigation based on several provisions or regulations, among others: the Criminal Procedure Code, Act No. 2 year 2002 as well as SEMA No. 1 in 1989. The protection of human rights for suspects, particularly in health care by providing opportunities for treatment in hospitals outside the prison, which is a right that must be respected and protected by the state.


Author(s):  
Аndrew Medvid

The article compares the requirements for the lawful application of detention without a court decision as a criminal procedure established in Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and in the second sentence of Article 29 part 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine. In particular, the content of the concept of "detention" of a person is studied, the list of subjects who have the right to detain a person without a court decision and the legal content and list of legitimate grounds for detention of a person without a court decision as a criminal procedure are studied and compared. Conventional, constitutional and criminal-procedural norms are also studied, as well as the necessity of mandatory further judicial review of the legality of the detention of a person, including the terms of such review. Based on a detailed analysis of these provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Constitution of Ukraine, relevant decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, it is established that the grounds for the detention of a person by a general entity, defined by paragraph 2 of Article 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, and a special entity, defined by subparagraphs 1 and 2 (except subparagraph 3) of paragraph 1 of Article 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, in general, correspond to the grounds for lawful detention of a person enshrined in Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Therefore, it cannot be qualified as unlawful interference with the human right to liberty and security of person. At the same time, proposals are formulated to make changes and additions to subparagraph 3 of paragraph 1 of Article 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is also proved that the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 12 and Articles 209 and 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are critical provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine regarding the lawful application of detention of a person without a court decision. These provisions actually eliminate some shortcomings and establish the necessary legal and procedural grounds for the clarified application of the provision of the second sentence of part 3 of Article 29 of the Constitution of Ukraine, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as the practice of their application developed by the European Court of Human Rights.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tran Thu Hien

The investigation in criminal procedure is deemed an important stage in terms of human rights guarantee. During this period, the accused who is in the most unfavorable position, should be paid the attention and protected. Therefore, the article aims to clarify the scientific legal aspects of the accused's human rights in criminal investigation, indicate some disadvantages in the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code 2015, offer legal solutions to strengthen the human rights guarantee of the accused in criminal investigation. Keywords: Criminal procedure, the accused, human rights, the investigation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Fatikhatus Sholikhah ◽  
Diema Hernyka Satyareni ◽  
Chandra Sukma Anugerah

Abstrak Persaingan merupakan hal yang biasa terjadi terutama dalam dunia bisnis, tidak terkecuali yang telah dialami oleh Bravo Supermarket Jombang. Bravo bukanlah satu-satunya supermarket di kota Jombang, sehingga Bravo harus bersaing dengan para kompetitornya agar Bravo bisa bersaing dan tetap produktif. Salah satu cara yang dapat digunakan dalam meningkatkan penjualan dan loyalitas pelanggan adalah dengan memberikan reward kepada para pelanggan terbaik. Oleh karena itu perlu dibuatlah sebuah perancangan sistem pendukung keputusan dalam pemilihan pelanggan terbaik pada Bravo. Dalam perancangan sistem yang dibuat nantinya berbasis web dengan metode SAW(Simple Additive Weighting)sebagai proses perhitungan pemilihan pelanggan terbaik. Hasil dari perancangan sistem pemilihan pelanggan terbaik pada Bravo Supermarket Jombang diharapkan dapat membantu pihak manajemen Bravo dalam pemilihan pelanggan terbaik yang akan menerima reward dan akhirnya akan mampu meningkatkan loyalitas pelanggan dan profit Bravo. Kata kunci: Bravo, sistem pendukung keputusan, pelanggan, SAW. Abstract Competition is a common thing, especially in the business world, is no exception has been experienced by Bravo Supermarket Jombang. Bravo is not the only supermarket in the town of Jombang, so that Bravo had to compete with its competitors in order Bravo to compete and remain productive. One way that can be used to increase sales and customer loyalty is to give rewards to the best customers. Therefore, it needs to be made to a design decision support system in the selection of the best customers on Bravo. In designing the system made later on a web-based method of SAW (Simple Additive weighting) as the process of calculating the best customer selection. The results of the election system design best customers at Bravo Supermarket Jombang expected to assist management in selecting the best customer Bravo who will receive rewards and will eventually be able to increase customer loyalty and profit Bravo. Key word: Bravo, decision support system, customers, SAW.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 088
Author(s):  
Wahyu Joni Kurniawan

This study was conducted to assist in the selection of martial assistant coach, to determine who is right. Its results will didadaptkan by comparing the two methods in the decision support system, by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) in limiting the problems in producing the desired solution, using multiple criteria (multi-criteria). AHP and SAW has a different way of doing the calculation. This is done to determine which method is looking for help in making decisions. And in this study are the criteria Discipline, Knowledge, Leadership, Attitude, and Level. And there are sub criteria on Level, which Black (AND I) and Red Black II.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Achmad Riyadi ◽  
Septi Andryana ◽  
Winarsih Winarsih

The migrants who have increased every year made bus transportation be one of the most widely used transportation for the Wonogiri’s people to go home to their hometowns. In Wonogiri district, bus transportation is available from various companies, ranging from local companies and non local who have primacy facilities, services, and a diverse bus fleet. The application of a decision support system is to make it easier for prospective passengers to make choices according to the desired criteria can be done using the Simple Additive Weighting, Weighted Product, and Promethee methods. The methods calculates the value of each criteria, weight criteria, criteria type, and is easy to apply to solve problems related to multi-criteria. There are 5 criteria used and 17 different bus companies as alternatives. The existence of this system is expected to make it easier for prospective passengers to decide the bus according to the desired criteria.Keywords:Promethee; Simple Additive Weighting; Weighted Product.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document