scholarly journals A Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Saliva from Fluoridated Pit-and-fissure Sealants, and Glass Ionomer Cements

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-416
Author(s):  
Vardharajula V Ramaiah ◽  
Abdullah Al-Rethaia
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-473
Author(s):  
Anulekh Babu ◽  
Shiji Dinakaran ◽  
Anupama S Gopinath ◽  
Varun Kumar ◽  
Soumya L Surabhilakshan ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Rios ◽  
Heitor Marques Honório ◽  
Paulo Amarante de Araújo ◽  
Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the properties (wear and roughness) of glass ionomer cements that could influence their indication as pit and fissure sealants. The utilized materials were Fuji Plus, Ketac-Molar and Vitremer (in two different proportions: 1:1 and ¼:1). The resin-based sealant Delton was used as control. By means of an electronic balance (precision of 10-4 g), wear was measured in function of weight loss after simulated toothbrushing. Superficial roughness was determined by means of a surface roughness-measuring apparatus. The results revealed that diluted Vitremer and Fuji Plus were less resistant to toothbrushing abrasion and had the greatest increase in superficial roughness.Although in clinical situations luting or diluted ionomer cements are often utilized as alternatives to resin-based sealants, the resultsof this study revealed that the properties of those cements are worse than those of restorative ionomers, whichpresented results similar to those of the evaluated resin sealant.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Kamala ◽  
Amitha Hegde

Glass ionomer cements possess several properties that support their consideration in a wide variety of clinical applications including Pit and fissure sealants. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate Fuji III and Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants in terms of retention, caries incidence and salivary fluoride release between two groups of children aged 6 and-8 years respectively. One hundred and ten first permanent molars were sealed and the clinical evaluation showed no incidence of caries. There was partial or complete retention of the sealant in 80% of the treated teeth in both groups at the one-year evaluation. Irrespective of the sealant used, the pattern of fluoride release remained consistent, with an initial high fluoride release followed by low prolonged leakage before returning to baseline value at the end of one year.


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahadevan Ganesh ◽  
Tandon Shobha

Abstract Aim The anatomical pits and fissures of the teeth have long been recognized as susceptible areas for the initiation of dental caries. The extreme vulnerability to decay of these pits and fissures on the occlusal surfaces has prompted dental scientists to seek methods of caries prevention. Motivated by the role of pit and fissure sealants in caries prevention, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Fuji VII® glass ionomer sealant and Concise® resin-based sealant. Methods and Materials An in vitro study was undertaken using forty premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. The teeth were divided into two groups and sealants were applied. One was an experimental group using Fuji VII® as a pit and fissure sealant and the other a control group using Concise®. The teeth were kept in gentian violet dye for 24 hours, the sectioned samples were observed for the extent of dye penetration, and scores were based on established scoring criteria. Results The comparison of the performance of the two groups showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The Concise® resin-based sealant performed better in terms of sealing ability than did the Fuji VII® glass ionomer sealant. Citation Ganesh M, Shobha T. Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of Fuji VII® and Concise® as Pit and Fissure Sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 May;(8)4:010-018.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia S. Bueno ◽  
Rafael M. Silva ◽  
Ana Paula R. Magalhães ◽  
Maria Fidela L. Navarro ◽  
Renata C. Pascotto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. e197-e203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Dionysopoulos ◽  
Kosmas Tolidis ◽  
Paris Gerasimou ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.C. Smith

The manifold uses of dental cements-as (a) luting agents, (b) cavity linings and bases, and (c) restorations for teeth—make them perhaps the most important materials in clinical dentistry. The research of the last 10 years has resulted in four main types, classified by matrix-forming species: (1) phosphate, (2) phenolate, (3) polycarboxylate, and (4) polymethacrylate. The zinc phosphate cements continue to be widely used for luting in an essentially unchanged form. Acidity and oral dissolution remain as problems. The zinc-oxide eugenol cements and their modifications are useful as linings and temporary materials but are susceptible to hydrolytic breakdown. Vanillate cements may be an improvement. Calcium hydroxide-salicylate cements are widely used as cavity linings, especially on exposures, and show improved resistance to acid dissolution. Polycarboxylate cements as both zinc polycarboxylate and glass-ionomer cements show adhesion potential, good physical properties, fluoride release, and, generally, good biological properties. Glass-ionomer cements when correctly manipulated show minimal oral dissolution. Polymethacrylate cements have been used principally for bonding etched cast metal restorations to etched enamel. Recently, adhesive crown-and-bridge cements have been developed. There are no well-established correlations between laboratory measurements of apparently relevant properties and clinical performance. More clinically-based research is needed to facilitate the development of new cements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document