Robotic Surgery Overview

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quang Nghĩa Lê ◽  
Vĩnh Hững Trần
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
New Era ◽  
The Past

Tóm tắt Trong thập niên vừa qua, Robotic Surgery mở ra kỷ nguyên mới trong mọi chuyên ngành ngoại khoa giúp giảm tai biến, biến chứng trên người bệnh và tăng chất lượng kết quả sau mổ. Bài này trình bày lịch sử, sự phát triển và công dụng của Robotic surgery. Abstract Over the past decade, Robotic Surgery has opened a new era in all surgical specialties in helping reduceaccident, complications in caring the patientsand to improve the quality of postoperative outcomes. This article reviews the history, development,current and future applications of Robotic surgery. Keyword: Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS); Laparoscopic Technologies; Robotic Surgery

Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 2323-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila R. Armijo ◽  
Chun-Kai Huang ◽  
Robin High ◽  
Melissa Leon ◽  
Ka-Chun Siu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1184-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Verseveld ◽  
Renée M. Barendse ◽  
Martijn P. Gosselink ◽  
Cornelis Verhoef ◽  
Eelco J. R. de Graaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Single Port Laparoscopy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.

scholarly journals Effects of minimally invasive and traditional surgeries on the quality of life of children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Tan ◽  
Erjia Huang ◽  
Xicheng Deng ◽  
Dongping Li ◽  
Shayuan Ouyang
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Physical Appearance

Abstract Background The focus of clinical care after treating congenital heart disease (CHD) has shifted from saving patients’ lives to improving their quality of life. This study aimed to examine the influence of minimally invasive and traditional surgeries on the quality of life of children with CHD. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 459 children aged 2–18 years with CHD treated at Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from July 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled, among whom 219 underwent minimally invasive surgery and 240 traditional surgery. The quality of life of children with CHD after surgery was reported by the patients’ parents. We applied propensity score matching to correct for confounding factors and conducted multiple linear regression analysis to examine the related effects of minimally invasive and traditional surgeries on the quality of life of children with CHD. Results The scores of problems related to perceived physical appearance in children undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher than those in those undergoing traditional surgery (p = 0.004). Different treatment modes were independent influencing factors for problems related to perceived physical appearance in children with CHD. There was no significant difference in average treatment effect scores of children undergoing different surgical procedures in other quality of life dimensions (problems related to cardiac symptoms and their treatment, drug treatment, anxiety regarding treatment, cognitive psychology, and communication), suggesting that different operation modes were not independent influencing factors for these related problems. Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery, minimally invasive surgery can significantly improve the physical appearance perception scores of children with CHD after surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery can improve the quality of life of children with CHD.

scholarly journals Long Term Survival and Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1019
Author(s):  
Tetsuro Kubota ◽  
Yoichiro Ishikawa ◽  
Soichiro Isshiki ◽  
Takeyoshi Yokoyama ◽  
Koji Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Early Gastric Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Robotic colorectal surgery: Where are we right now?

2010 ◽  
Vol 224 (7) ◽  
pp. 1415-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kang ◽  
K Y Lee
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Colorectal Disease ◽  
Widespread Application ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery has become mainstream in surgical management of colorectal disease. Based on evidence of oncologic safety and benefit to patients, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is regarded as a successful alternative to open surgery. Since the introduction of the da Vinci® system as another tool for minimally invasive surgery, there have been several reports regarding the feasibility and safety of the system. The authors looked at their experience with 412 robotic colorectal surgeries and found that it was feasible and safe. Incidence of operation-related morbidity was around 11 per cent and system-related problems were 2.4 per cent. There was no operation-related or system-related mortality. From a technological perspective, robotic surgery has several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including a magnifying view with a three-dimensional image, a stable camera platform, and instruments with Endowrist® technology that allow for seven degrees of freedom of movement. However, there is still room for improvement. The revolution of robotic technology can aid in the realization of a dream: a smaller, cheaper, and more sophisticated robotic system, which will further facilitate the widespread application of robotic surgery to colorectal disease.

scholarly journals Quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Jason H. Chen ◽  
Jennifer M. Ayscue ◽  
Mohammed Bayasi ◽  
James F. Fitzgerald ◽  
Thomas J. Stahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery

scholarly journals Robotic Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene I. Luna
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Proper Understanding ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Single Site Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery has changed the landscape of women’s surgical healthcare. Conventional and robotic laparoscopy are the preferred approach for many major minimally invasive gynecological procedures. However, the philosophy of minimally invasive surgery has been pushed to reduce the size and minimize the number of ports placed. Many conventional minimally invasive surgical procedures use 3–5 ports through multiple small incisions. Laparoscopic single site surgery tries to perform on that philosophy but has its limitations. Enters robotic surgery already a major force in minimally invasive surgery and now sets to remove the limitations of single site surgery. However it requires proper understanding of the instruments and the techniques for successful robotic single site surgery. It starts with patient selection. Knowing the instruments needed and the proper set up of those instruments. Then knowing how to use the instruments in operating and suturing and closing. And finish with special considerations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document