Questions about “No evidence on the effectiveness of oral splints for the management of temporomandibular joint dysfunction pain in both short and long-term follow-up systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies”

Abstract Purpose The fixation of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKA) tends to be difficult, leading to a reduction in implant survival. One option for achieving a more stable anchorage is to use metaphyseal cones and sleeves. The objective of the present paper is to provide a current comparative meta-analysis on survival and clinical results of cones vs. sleeves, with a differentiation between the short- and long-term outcome. Methods A search of the literature was conducted systematically to include original papers from 2010 to June 2021. The following parameters were taken into account: revision for aseptic loosening, revision for any reason, periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), KSS as well as KSFS. Studies with a mean follow-up of at least 60 months were defined to be long-term follow-up studies (LT). All other studies were included in the short-term (ST) study analysis. A pooled incidence was used as a summary statistic using a random intercept logistic regression model. Results The present meta-analysis included 43 publications with 3008 rTKA. Of these, 23 publications with 1911 cases were allocated to the sleeve group (SG) and 20 papers with 1097 cases to the cone group (CG). CG showed overall numerically higher complication rates in short- and long-term follow-up, compared with SG. Aseptic loosening occurred at a rate of 0.4% in SG (LT) and 4.1% in CG (LT) (p = 0.09). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was more frequent in the cone group (7% in ST and 11.7% in LT) than in the sleeve group (3.4% in ST and 4.9% in LT, p = 0.02 both). The total revision rate was 5.5% in SG (LT) and 14.4% in CG (LT) (p = 0.12). The clinical scores were also comparable between the two groups. Hinged prothesis were used more frequent in the cone group (ST p < 0.001; LT p = 0.10), whereas CC type protheses were used more frequently in the sleeve group (ST p < 0.001; LT p < 0.11). Conclusions This meta-analysis takes into account the longest follow-up periods covered to date. Both cones and sleeves represent a reliable fixation method in the case of severe bone loss in rTKA, although the higher rate of PJI after cone fixation remains a source of concern. A metaphyseal fixation of hinged implants should be taken into account. Level of evidence II (meta-analysis).

Download Full-text

Abstract 1998: Short- and Long-Term Effects of Abciximab in Patients Undergoing Primary Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.116.suppl_16.ii_432 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽

Author(s):

Sujethra Vasu ◽

Gregg W Stone ◽

David L Brown

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽

Randomized Trials ◽

No Reduction ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Primary Stenting ◽

Short And Long Term

Background: Both short- and long-term benefits of abciximab therapy in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported. However, primary stenting is the preferred treatment of AMI and conflicting data exists on the effect of abciximab therapy on outcomes following primary stent treatment of AMI. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of all randomized trials of abciximab in primary stenting for AMI for which there was short-term (30-day) and long-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases using the following key words: stent, acute myocardial infarction, abciximab and randomized trial. Four studies (ISAR-2, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC and ACE) were included in this analysis. The incidence of the individual end points of death, reinfarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days and at long-term follow-up was extracted. Follow-up data was available at 1 year for ACE and CADILLAC, at 3 years for ADMIRAL and 5 years for ISAR-2. A random effects model was used to calculate the combined odds ratio (OR) of reinfarction, TVR and mortality associated with the use of abciximab. Results: The 4 trials enrolled 2137 patients of whom 1074 were randomized to abciximab and 1063 to placebo. Long-term follow up was available for 2107 patients, 1064 in the abciximab group and 1043 in the control group. At 30 days, abciximab resulted in a significant reduction in the odds of TVR (OR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.27–0.75, P=0.003) and a non-significant reduction in the odds of reinfarction (OR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.18–1.0, P=0.06) but no reduction in 30-day mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.47–1.2, P=0.34). During long-term follow up, abciximab treatment resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of TVR (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58–1.0, P=0.06) but no reduction in reinfarction (OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.3–1.1, P=0.12) or mortality (OR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.48–1.6, P=0.74). Conclusions: Abciximab resulted in a significant reduction in TVR at 30 days that diminished over time. We were unable to demonstrate a significant reduction in reinfarction or mortality at 30 days or at 1–5 years. These results suggest the need for an appropriately powered clinical trial to define the role of abciximab during primary stenting for AMI.

Download Full-text

Carpal tunnel release with versus without flexor retinaculum reconstruction for carpal tunnel syndrome at short- and long-term follow up—A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0211369 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. e0211369

Author(s):

Sike Lai ◽

Kaibo Zhang ◽

Jian Li ◽

Weili Fu

Keyword(s):

Carpal Tunnel ◽

Carpal Tunnel Release ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Short And Long Term

Download Full-text

Exercise interventions in lateral elbow tendinopathy have better outcomes than passive interventions, but the effects are small: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2123 subjects in 30 trials

British Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1136/bjsports-2020-102525 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. bjsports-2020-102525

Author(s):

Stefanos Karanasios ◽

Vasileios Korakakis ◽

Rod Whiteley ◽

Ioannis Vasilogeorgis ◽

Sarah Woodbridge ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Short Term ◽

Lateral Elbow ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Wait And See ◽

Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared with other conservative interventions in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) on pain and function.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to grade the certainty of evidence. Self-perceived improvement, pain intensity, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and elbow disability were used as primary outcome measures.Eligibility criteriaRCTs assessing the effectiveness of exercise alone or as an additive intervention compared with passive interventions, wait-and-see or injections in patients with LET.Results30 RCTs (2123 participants, 5 comparator interventions) were identified. Exercise outperformed (low certainty) corticosteroid injections in all outcomes at all time points except short-term pain reduction. Clinically significant differences were found in PFGS at short-term (mean difference (MD): 12.15, (95% CI) 1.69 to 22.6), mid-term (MD: 22.45, 95% CI 3.63 to 41.3) and long-term follow-up (MD: 18, 95% CI 11.17 to 24.84). Statistically significant differences (very low certainty) for exercise compared with wait-and-see were found only in self-perceived improvement at short-term, pain reduction and elbow disability at short-term and long-term follow-up. Substantial heterogeneity in descriptions of equipment, load, duration and frequency of exercise programmes were evident.ConclusionsLow and very low certainty evidence suggests exercise is effective compared with passive interventions with or without invasive treatment in LET, but the effect is small.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018082703.

Download Full-text

Long-term Follow-up of Craniofacial Alterations in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The Angle Orthodontist ◽

10.2319/093008-511r.1 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 79 (6) ◽

pp. 1057-1062 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Marinka Twilt ◽

Alcuin J. M. Schulten ◽

Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽

Lisette W. A. van Suijlekom-Smit

Keyword(s):

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽

Temporomandibular Joint ◽

Initial Study ◽

Study Cohort ◽

Craniofacial Skeleton ◽

Lateral Cephalograms ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Angular Measurements

Abstract Objective: To investigate changes in the craniofacial skeleton in relation to the changes in condylar alterations that occur during long-term follow-up in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Materials and Methods: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement is defined as a condylar alteration that is observed on the orthopantomogram. Lateral cephalograms were used to determine linear and angular measurements. Results: Seventy of 97 patients from the initial study cohort were included, with a mean follow-up of 68 months. The overall prevalence of condylar alterations and posterior rotation of the mandible decreased; however, the prevalence of retrognathia remained the same. Patients showed improvement in the degree of retrognathia and posterior rotation (40% ANB, 51% OP-SN, and 44% GO-GN-SN). Improvement in the degree of retrognathia was seen more often in patients with improved condylar alterations than in patients with persistent alterations and in those without alterations (50%, 33%, and 28%, respectively). The degree of posterior rotation improved almost equally in patients without TMJ involvement and in patients with improved condylar alterations (57% and 50% by OP-SN, and 67% and 38% GO-GN-SN, respectively) and did not improve in patients with stable persistent alterations. Conclusion: Both condylar and craniofacial alterations can improve in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Download Full-text