scholarly journals What is the best buffer for preservation of cells in vitro: a standardization for gill cells in order to use in the Comet Assay

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghisi N.C. ◽  
Ramsdorf W.A. ◽  
Cestari M.M.
Keyword(s):  
Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
VHS Souza ◽  
A Paula OHohne ◽  
R Grando ◽  
N de Cassia de Almeida Queiroz ◽  
GM Pastore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Damián Muruzabal ◽  
Julen Sanz-Serrano ◽  
Sylvie Sauvaigo ◽  
Bertrand Treillard ◽  
Ann-Karin Olsen ◽  
...  

AbstractMechanistic toxicology is gaining weight for human health risk assessment. Different mechanistic assays are available, such as the comet assay, which detects DNA damage at the level of individual cells. However, the conventional alkaline version only detects strand breaks and alkali-labile sites. We have validated two modifications of the in vitro assay to generate mechanistic information: (1) use of DNA-repair enzymes (i.e., formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, endonuclease III, human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase I and human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase) for detection of oxidized and alkylated bases as well as (2) a modification for detecting cross-links. Seven genotoxicants with different mechanisms of action (potassium bromate, methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, hydrogen peroxide, cisplatin, mitomycin C, and benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide), as well as a non-genotoxic compound (dimethyl sulfoxide) and a cytotoxic compound (Triton X-100) were tested on TK-6 cells. We were able to detect with high sensitivity and clearly differentiate oxidizing, alkylating and cross-linking agents. These modifications of the comet assay significantly increase its sensitivity and its specificity towards DNA lesions, providing mechanistic information regarding the type of damage.


1999 ◽  
Vol 138 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei A Musatov ◽  
Vladimir N Anisimov ◽  
Véronique André ◽  
Carole Vigreux ◽  
Thierry Godard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 324 ◽  
pp. 781-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Araujo Matzenbacher ◽  
Ana Letícia Hilario Garcia ◽  
Marcela Silva dos Santos ◽  
Caroline Cardoso Nicolau ◽  
Suziane Premoli ◽  
...  

Polyhedron ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Chuan-Chuan Zeng ◽  
Shang-Hai Lai ◽  
De-Gang Xing ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  

Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 431-431
Author(s):  
José M Enciso ◽  
Kristine B Gutzkow ◽  
Gunnar Brunborg ◽  
Ann-Karin Olsen ◽  
Adela López de Cerain ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Neves-Costa ◽  
Dora Pedroso ◽  
Luis F Moita

Abstract This protocol details the experimental procedure for performing the comet assay, a very sensitive DNA break assay based on single cell gel electrophoresis.The analysis of DNA strand breaks, both single- and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs, respectively), was performed in immune responsive cells. The cell line used was the human monocytic cell line THP-1, an adherent cell type with many known applications in in vitro studies of innate immunity. The comet assay is a robust procedure that allows the accurate and reproducible quantification of DNA damage. Here we describe not only the comet assay step-by-step protocol, but also some important aspects related to troubleshooting.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100190
Author(s):  
Cecilia Bossa ◽  
Cristina Andreoli ◽  
Martine Bakker ◽  
Flavia Barone ◽  
Isabella De Angelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document