A Survey of Musculoskeletal Symptoms & Risk Factors for the 119 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Activities

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Day-Sung Kim ◽  
Myung-Kug Moon ◽  
Kyoo-Sang Kim
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2376
Author(s):  
Moritz Kielkopf ◽  
Thomas Meinel ◽  
Johannes Kaesmacher ◽  
Urs Fischer ◽  
Marcel Arnold ◽  
...  

(1) Background: The benefit of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment declines with any time delay until treatment. Hence, factors influencing the time from symptom onset to admission (TTA) are of utmost importance. This study aimed to assess temporal trends and risk factors for delays in TTA. (2) Methods: We included 1244 consecutive patients from 2015 to 2018 with suspected stroke presenting within 24 h after symptom onset registered in our prospective, pre-specified hospital database. Temporal trends were assessed by comparing with a cohort of a previous study in 2006. Factors associated with TTA were assessed by univariable and multivariable regression analysis. (3) Results: In 1244 patients (median [IQR] age 73 [60–82] years; 44% women), the median TTA was 96 min (IQR 66–164). The prehospital time delay reduced by 27% in the last 12 years and the rate of patients referred by Emergency medical services (EMS) increased from 17% to 51% and the TTA for admissions by General Practitioner (GP) declined from 244 to 207 min. Factors associated with a delay in TTA were stroke severity (beta−1.9; 95% CI–3.6 to −0.2 min per point NIHSS score), referral by General Practitioner (GP, beta +140 min, 95% CI 100–179), self-admission (+92 min, 95% CI 57–128) as compared to admission by emergency medical services (EMS) and symptom onset during nighttime (+57 min, 95% CI 30–85). Conclusions: Although TTA improved markedly since 2006, our data indicates that continuous efforts are mandatory to raise public awareness on the importance of fast hospital referral in patients with suspected stroke by directly informing EMS, avoiding contact of a GP, and maintaining high effort for fast transportation also in patients with milder symptoms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 01038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pakinai Chaicharoenwut ◽  
Jarotwan Koiwanit ◽  
Pannapa Changpetch ◽  
Sirisuda Buatongkue ◽  
Chumpol Yuangyai

Dedicated emergency medical services (EMS) are important to patients’ chances of survival. In particular, the quicker such services arrive at the scene of an incident, the higher the survival rate. Therefore, the management of ambulance bases is an essential aspect of emergency medical services. Further, the locations of ambulance bases are determined based on patient demand. However, in practice, many elements should be taken into account in a risk assessment of given areas within a locale. Specifically, each area should be assessed for the number and severity of accidents that ordinarily take place there, the number and size of the public events it hosts, its population density, and the number of elderly people resident. In this study, we use a spatial-temporal approach to integrate those factors into a risk assessment of areas relative to each other in a locale. Based on this risk assessment, we determine the optimal locations for ambulance bases in order to minimize response time. We validate our approach using Bangkok as a case study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 335-344
Author(s):  
Eun Jin Kang ◽  
Sun Hyu Kim

Objectives This study evaluated unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transport for pediatric patients depending on whether they received emergency department (ED) treatment after EMS transport. Methods Pediatric patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received treatment at the ED (ED treatment) or did not receive treatment at the ED (non-ED treatment). Results The non-ED treatment group comprised 65 of the total 794 patients. The elapsed time from scene to arrival at the ED was longer in the non-ED treatment group than in the ED treatment group. Weekdays as the days of EMS transport, ground falls rather than traffic accidents as the reason for non-disease-related symptoms, and no immobilization for prehospital treatment were risk factors for non-ED treatment in EMS-transported patients. Causes of not receiving ED treatment for the non-ED treatment group were the patient’s or caregiver’s decision (12%) and the doctor’s suggestion (88%). Conclusions Weekdays rather than weekends, ground falls rather than traffic accidents, and no immobilization before hospital are risk factors for not receiving ED treatment. The most common cause of not receiving ED treatment is the doctor’s suggestion.


Author(s):  
TA Bolobonkina ◽  
AA Dementiev ◽  
NV Minaeva ◽  
NN Smirnova

Summary. Introduction: A biological factor is the leading occupational hazard for healthcare professionals. Identification of risk factors for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in ambulance employees and substantiation of measures to prevent the spread of this infection is a modern-day challenge. The purpose of our study was to examine COVID-19 incidence rates in emergency medical services (EMS) workers and to identify occupational risk factors for this infection. Materials and methods: We studied COVID-19 cases among Ryazan ambulance employees in terms of their age, sex, position, and specialty taking into account disease severity and duration for the period from May 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020. Results: We established higher relative risk values and incidence rates of the novel coronavirus infection in EMS workers compared to the population of the city of Ryazan (p < 0.05). In May–August 2020, COVID-19 cases among the ambulance employees and the population of Ryazan, as well as the number of EMS-attended patients with acute respiratory infection followed a similar pattern. The number of COVID-19 cases among the staff of resuscitation crews was significantly higher than that in the general practice and other specialized crews (p < 0.05). We estimated a statistically significant high relative risk of a longer and severer course of the disease among physicians compared with paramedics (RR = 1.333; p < 0.05) and among EMS workers aged 61 or older (RR = 1.286; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Emergency medical services workers have a high occupational risk of COVID-19 in the pandemic. Among them, employees aged 31–35 and resuscitation crewmembers face a higher risk of infection. Elderly employees aged 61–64, medical doctors, and general profile EMS workers are most at risk for a more severe and durable disease course.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document