scholarly journals Therapeutic dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin may decrease mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Kadir Canoglu ◽  
Bengu Saylan

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism or extensive thrombosis is relatively common in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and has been associated with increased mortality. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, several prophylactic doses and types of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are being used worldwide; however, there are no high-quality studies or recommendations for an optimal prophylactic LMWH dose. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship between coagulation parameters and the LMWH dose, and mortality and ICU admission in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on clinical features, coagulation parameters and anticoagulant medications of inpatients with severe COVID-19 were collected for the period between 11 March 2020 and 31 April 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and ICU admission for prophylactic dose LMWH (0.5 mg/kg twice daily) and therapeutic dose LMWH (1 mg/kg twice daily). SAMPLE SIZE: 154 cases. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (63.6%) patients were treated with the LMWH prophylactic dose and 56 (36.4%) patients were treated with the therapeutic dose. Forty-four (44.9%) of 98 patients using the prophylactic dose LMWH died, while 10 (17.9%) of 56 patients using the therapeutic dose LMWH died ( P =.001). Mortality was 6.4-fold higher in the prophylactic dose LMWH users than in the therapeutic dose LMWH users (OR=6.5, 95% CI: 2.4–17.6, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic dosing of LMWH may decrease mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 infected pneumonia. More aggressive thromboprophylaxis regimens using higher doses of heparin should be evaluated in prospective studies. LIMITATIONS: Lack of information about bleeding complications. LMWH was not compared with other anticoagulant therapies. There was no comparison between our two groups on the APACHE score. Used different doses of LMWH in different clinics in our hospital. Single-center, retrospective study. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghui Li ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Rongzhou He ◽  
Junmeng Zheng ◽  
Zhibo Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The optimal anticoagulant scheme during catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH) during CDT for DVT.Methods: The clinical data of DVT patients who underwent CDT during the past six years was retrospectively collected and reviewed. Patients were divided into therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (TPDA) and sub therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (sub-TPDA) groups according to LMWH dosage.Results: A total of 61 patients involving 61 limbs were comprised. Acute and subacute DVT were identified in 39 (63.9%) and 22 (36.1%) patients, respectively. Thrombosis involving the iliac vein was identified in 34 (55.7%) patients. Inferior vena cava filter placement was performed in 38 (62.3%) patients. Intraoperatively, adjunctive balloons, stents, and thrombectomy were provided for nine (14.8%), four (6.6%), and one (1.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (32.8%) patients accepted TPDA therapy, while 41 (67.2%) patients were administrated with sub-TPDA therapy. Median urokinase infusion rate was 2.5 (0.83 to 5) x 104 U/h. Median infusion duration time was 4 (2 to 14) days, and median urokinase dose infused was 2.4 (0.6 to 10.80) x 106 U. During CDT, five (8.2%) cases of minor bleeding were observed, and blood transfusion was not required. No major bleeding, symptomatic pulmonary embolisms, or death occurred. Complete (>90%) and partial thrombolysis (50~90%) were achieved in 56 (91.8%) patients. In comparison with sub-TPDA group, TPDA group exhibited no significant difference in baseline characteristics, clinical improvement, thrombolysis results, and complications. Conclusions: Anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin during CDT with low infusion rate for DVT is likely to be feasible and safe. Sub-therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and therapeutic-dose could be used for CDT with similar clinical outcome and bleeding complications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghui Li ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Rongzhou He ◽  
Junmeng Zheng ◽  
Zhibo Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The optimal anticoagulant scheme during catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH) during CDT for DVT.Methods: The clinical data of DVT patients who underwent CDT during the past six years was retrospectively collected and reviewed. Patients were divided into therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (TPDA) and sub therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (sub-TPDA) groups according to LMWH dosage.Results: A total of 61 patients involving 61 limbs were comprised. Acute and subacute DVT were identified in 39 (63.9%) and 22 (36.1%) patients, respectively. Thrombosis involving the iliac vein was identified in 34 (55.7%) patients. Inferior vena cava filter placement was performed in 38 (62.3%) patients. Intraoperatively, adjunctive balloons, stents, and thrombectomy were provided for nine (14.8%), four (6.6%), and one (1.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (32.8%) patients accepted TPDA therapy, while 41 (67.2%) patients were administrated with sub-TPDA therapy. Median urokinase infusion rate was 2.5 (0.83 to 5) x 104 U/h. Median infusion duration time was 4 (2 to 14) days, and median urokinase dose infused was 2.4 (0.6 to 10.80) x 106 U. During CDT, five (8.2%) cases of minor bleeding were observed, and blood transfusion was not required. No major bleeding, symptomatic pulmonary embolisms, or death occurred. Complete (>90%) and partial thrombolysis (50~90%) were achieved in 56 (91.8%) patients. In comparison with sub-TPDA group, TPDA group exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, clinical improvement, thrombolysis results, and complications. Conclusions: Anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin during CDT with low infusion rate for DVT is likely to be feasible and safe. Sub-therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and therapeutic-dose could be used for CDT with similar clinical outcome and bleeding complications.


Author(s):  
Sugandha Kassere ◽  
Juhi Kalra ◽  
Anurag Rawat ◽  
Saurabh Kohli

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Anticoagulants are the most commonly implicated drugs, used in cardiology unit and they are responsible for a majority of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the pattern of ADRs reported with anticoagulant drugs used in the cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital.Methods: This observational prospective study was undertaken from September 2017 to August 2018. Causality assessment of ADRs was assessed using the WHO and Naranjo scale of probability. The severity was assessed by modified Hartwig and Siegel scale, and preventability of ADRs was assessed by Schumock and Thornton scale.Results: Out of the total forty-one ADRs recorded, 40 (97.56%) were mild and 1 (2.44%) was reported as severe on the Hartwig and Siegel severity scale. Hematuria (68.29%) was the most common ADR followed by hemoptysis (14.63%). Among all anticoagulants, low molecular weight heparin was associated with the majority of ADRs (85.37%). The WHO causality and Naranjo Scale revealed that maximum of the ADRs (~80%) were possible. All ADRs reported was Type “A” reactions according to Wills and Brown classification of ADRs. Majority of ADRs (97.56%) were probably preventable.Conclusions: In the present study, hematuria was the most common ADR reported. Among all anticoagulants, Low molecular weight heparin accounted for the majority of ADRs followed by acenocoumarol and heparin. Intensive monitoring and frequent reporting need to be done in cardiac units to improve patient safety.


Author(s):  
S. Shanmugapriya ◽  
K. Bhuvaneswari ◽  
K. Rashmi

Objective: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is an indirect thrombin inhibitor used clinically as an anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis of patients at risk of deep vein thrombosis. The study was done to assess the magnitude of rise in serum potassium after administration of low molecular weight heparin comparing enoxaparin with dalteparin and to evaluate the frequency of clinically significant hyperkalemia in the population studied.Methods: The study was done as a prospective non-randomized observational study in a population of 32 patients started on heparin for thromboprophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism or stroke.Results: A statistically significant elevation in serum potassium was seen in patients treated with LMWH (p = 0.007). The magnitude of rise in potassium was significantly higher in enoxaparin (p = 0.008) than the dalteparin group (p = 0.447). A clinically relevant hyperkalemia of>5 mEq/l was seen in 25% of the population studied. Other important associations detected from the study were that the advancing age and increasing dose could be potential risk factors contributory to an accentuated rise in serum potassium which may culminate in clinically significant hyperkalemia.Conclusion: The study has highlighted that the likelihood of rise in potassium levels during LMWH therapy necessitates monitoring of serum potassium.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (01) ◽  
pp. 057-061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis W T Nilsen ◽  
Lasse Gøransson ◽  
Alf-Inge Larsen ◽  
Øyvind Hetland ◽  
Peter Kierulf

SummaryOne hundred patients were included in a randomized open trial to assess the systemic factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin inhibitory effect as well as the safety profile of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) given subcutaneously in conjunction with streptokinase (SK) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The treatment was initiated prior to SK, followed by repeated injections every 12 h for 7 days, using a dose of 150 anti-Xa units per kg body weight. The control group received unfractionated heparin (UFH) 12,500 IU subcutaneously every 12 h for 7 days, initiated 4 h after start of SK infusion. All patients received acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) initiated prior to SK.Serial blood samples were collected prior to and during the first 24 h after initiation of SK infusion for determination of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (Fl+2), thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) complexes, fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and cardiac enzymes. Bleeding complications and adverse events were carefully accounted for.Infarct characteristics, as judged by creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT), were similar in both groups of patients.A comparable transient increase in Fl+2, TAT and FPA was noted irrespective of heparin regimen. Increased anti-Xa activity in patients given LMWH prior to thrombolytic treatment had no impact on indices of systemic thrombin activation.The incidence of major bleedings was significantly higher in patients receiving LMWH as compared to patients receiving UFH. However, the occurrence of bleedings was modified after reduction of the initial LMWH dose to 100 anti-Xa units per kg body weight.In conclusion, systemic FXa- and thrombin activity following SK-infusion in patients with acute MI was uninfluenced by conjunctive LMWH treatment.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (02) ◽  
pp. 338-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Navarro ◽  
J. P. Cambus ◽  
H. Caplain ◽  
P. d’Azemar ◽  
J. Necciari ◽  
...  

SummaryVenous thromboembolism may be efficiently treated by once-a-day (o.d.) administration of a high dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) instead of administration of the same total dose in two injections a day (b.i. d.). To reduce the volume of the subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, a more concentrated form of the drug is advisable. This study was designed to compare the bioavailability of 2 formulations of nadroparin containing 10,250 and 20,500 anti-Xa IU·ml-1 respectively. This was an open, randomized, cross-over study where 12 healthy volunteers (age 18-35) were enrolled. They received either 90 anti-Xa IU·kg-1 b.i. d. of the 10,250 IU preparation (treatment A), or 180 anti-Xa IU·kg-1 o.d. of the 20,500 IU preparation (treatment B) for 10 days. On day 1, the subjects were sampled between 0 and 12 h (treatment A) or between 0 and 24 h (treatment B). On day 10, they were sampled between 0 and 12 h and between 12 and 24 h (treatment A) or between 0 and 24 h (treatment B). Anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities were determined by specific chromogenic assays. The main result of the study was that the bioavailability of the anti-Xa activity of the 2 nadroparin formulations was equivalent, as shown by the comparison of the AUC0-12 h plus AUC12-24 h (treatment A) and the AUC0-24 h (treatment B), calculated on day 10. This study also allowed a number of interesting observations to be made. 1) Between day 1 and day 10, there was an accumulation of the anti-Xa activity for treatment A but not for treatment B (accumulation factors: 1.6 and 1.1 respectively); 2) On day 10, the AUC0-12 h were slightly but significantly lower than the AUC12-24 h suggesting a circadian effect for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities; 3) the clearance of the anti-Xa activity was comparable at the 2-dose regimens, while that of the anti-IIa activity was lower in treatment B than in treatment A, indicating a significant dose effect for the pharmacodynamics of the longer heparin chains; 4) On average, the clearance of the anti-IIa activity was twice as high as that of the anti-Xa activity; 5) For treatment B, significant APTT prolongations were noticed at Tmax (prolongation factor: 1.7 ± 0.25), in relation with the anti-IIa activity (0.3 ± 0.1 IU·ml–1).


Author(s):  
V. WOUTERS ◽  
A. GADISSEUR ◽  
C. KENYON

Thromboprophylaxis after discharge for COVID-19: an unsolved puzzle Whilst recovering from severe COVID-19, a 61-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with abrupt onset epigastric pain, nausea and constipation for 2 days. Four days earlier, he had been released from the hospital after 2 weeks of hospitalization for severe bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia. A CT scan of the abdomen revealed a splenic infarction despite treatment with a prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The incidence, pathophysiology and prevention of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document