scholarly journals CONCEPTS AND SIGNS OF PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF STATE REGISTRATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS ON REAL ESTATE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-238
Author(s):  
Natalia Martyniuk
2020 ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Nataliia MARTYNIUK

The paper is devoted to the coverage of the category of administrative procedure for the provision of public services for state registration of real rights to immovable property. The categories «stage», «administrative procedure for the provision of public services» and «stages of the administrative procedure for the provision of public services» are compared. A description of the stages of the procedure for providing public services for state registration of real property rights is given. It is emphasized that the administrative procedure for state registration of real property rights has consisted of the following stages: 1) submission of applications and documents to it includes actions such as acceptance and verification of documents submitted for state registration of rights and encumbrances; application registration, etc.; 2) consideration of the case or investigation of all circumstances related to the provision of public service; 3) making a decision on the provision of public service for state registration of real rights to immovable property; 4) making entries in the state register of rights to provide public services for state registration of real rights to immovable property; 5) issuance of documents for the provision of public services for state registration of real rights to immovable property. Attention is drawn to the fact that the main tasks of the stage of acceptance and verification of documents for public services submitted for state registration of rights and their encumbrances stage are: verification of documents on payment of administrative fees for public services and extraction from the State Register of Rights; acceptance of applications and documents required for state registration of rights; registration of the application in the database on registration of applications and inquiries; verification of documents for compliance with general requirements.


10.12737/5501 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Павел Стрельников ◽  
Pavel Strelnikov

The question of the protection of property rights of legal entities in a market economy is of particular importance because it is the basis of their economic activities. Particularly acute this problem gives the specifics of the legal regime of the real estate, which has a significant impact on the choice of the means of protecting the violated rights, questioning the use of some of them. One of the methods of protection is indicated by replevin. The question of vindication as a way to protect the property rights of legal entities in the real estate is very controversial, because often put into question the very possibility of vindication property. The arguments for limiting the use of debt collection as a way to protect the rights of ownership of real estate can be divided into two groups. The first related to the essential characteristics of the real estate. The second is based on the legal regime of property, largely determined by the system of state registration of the respective object and deal with them. Based on an analysis of court decisions the author concludes that the feasibility of vindication by prohibiting the use of illegal property owner and the release of land, buildings, structures and premises in them from his property.


Author(s):  
Inna Sevryukova

Introduction. The legal description of the contractual grounds for restrictions and encumbrances on the right of ownership of real estate can be provided only after a comprehensive study of the common features of the contractual structures, which establish the relevant rights and obligations of the parties. The main common feature of such agreements is the emergence of appropriate property benefits for the owner, which is to enable the owner to satisfy their interests at the expense of someone else's real estate, resulting in restrictions and encumbrances on property subject to the contract. It should also be emphasized that each subjective right has its limits of exercise, including the subjective right of ownership, as well as other real property rights. Of course, the nature of such restrictions must be different and depend on the content and nature of the restricted right, its object and the grounds for the restrictions. That is, restrictions on property rights and other property rights cannot be the same. Restrictions on property rights are established in the interests of society and arise by law, as well as in the interests of individuals (on the basis of law, contract, court decision), and restrictions on other property rights are primarily due to protection of the property from which they originate and the legitimate interests of the owner. In our opinion, the category of real contracts should include those types of contracts relating to real estate, including contracts of encumbrance of property rights on the basis of which the rights subject to state registration arise. Purpose and objectives of the study The main common feature of such agreements is the emergence of appropriate property benefits for the owner, which is to enable the owner to satisfy their interests at the expense of someone else's real estate, resulting in restrictions and encumbrances on property subject to the contract. Therefore, we can argue for the existence of a certain generalizing type of contract, the features of which are inherent in all its subspecies, in particular, contracts for the establishment of easements, superficies, emphyteusis, mortgage agreement. Such an agreement in the legal literature is called by some authors as a real contract. However, issues concerning its legal nature, place in the system of civil law contracts remain debatable. Research methods. The research carried out in the article is based on the assessment of generally accepted approaches to defining the characteristic features of problematic issues of contractual grounds for the emergence of restrictions and encumbrances of property rights to real estate. It should be emphasized that these issues are controversial due to the lack of clear legislative regulation, which leads to imperfect legal regulation and violations of the rights of participants in property turnover. Research conclusions. As a result of the study, the idea is given that in the current legislation of Ukraine due to the lack of a clear concept of the relationship between the category of "encumbrance" and "restriction" of property rights, as well as the uncertainty of property rights, some questions remain about the classification of certain rights accordingly, about the types of material contract, this issue is debatable and needs further study. It is possible to make about polystructurality of the real contract that causes division of this type of the civil law contract into kinds and subspecies. In our opinion, such a division depends on the legal nature and scope of the relevant types of restrictions and encumbrances on the right of ownership of real estate, which are proposed by current civil law.


Author(s):  
M. Hudyma

This scientific publication attempts to clarify the legal nature of state registration as a legal fact in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights. There has been made a critical analysis of the viewpoint of supporters of the recognition of the right-establishing character of the state registration and the viewpoint of scholars who consider that the state registration has the function of confirmation, legalization of already established rights. The legislative approach to the relevant issues, which reveals the inconsistency of regulations on the place and importance of state registration in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights is analyzed. The root of all disagreements and inconsistencies is seen in the desire to take a clear position that the state registration performs only one function: either statutory or confirmatory, while the possibility of simultaneous performance of these two functions was not practically considered.It is substantiated that the legal nature of state registration is quite heterogeneous. If we talk about the property and legal significance of the act of state registration, then for the parties to the contract or other direct participants in the relative legal relationship aimed at the transfer of property rights to real estate, it will have a confirmatory value, and for third parties in absolute legal relations it will be of legal significance, providing a proof of this fact known. If we consider the state registration from the point of view of the dynamics of the process of transfer of property rights, to determine its role in this mechanism, it is the final legal fact in the legal structure, which entails the emergence of a new right holder. The publication emphasizes that giving state registration the importance of the final legal fact in the legal structure that causes the transition of property right we should not, however, shift the emphasis and consider it a priority legal fact in comparison with others. Although the registration of property rights is mandatory, it is secondary to the mechanism of transfer of ownership and other property rights to real estate, because it loses any sense and is absolutely impossible without the occurrence of other legal facts, including – the conclusion of a contract (real or consensual).


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
P.A. Strelnikov ◽  

This article reveals the features of obligatory ways of protection of the rights of privacy to immovable property of legal entities from the perspective of the established judicial practice. The importance of this problem is conditioned by the basic nature of the property right as the basis of property turnover in the state and legal guarantees of protection of rights, freedoms and legal interests of legal entities to immovable property, among which the judicial procedure of protection of rights of legal entities is one of the ways of not prohibited and practiced. The purpose of this article is to identify the features of invalidation of the transaction and the application of the consequences of invalidity, as well as the recognition of invalidation of the act of state registration of rights to immovable property of legal entities, including challenging the registered right to immovable property of legal entities. To achieve this goal, the author formulates the following tasks: identification of specifics of obligatory ways to protect the rights to immovable property of legal entities.


2019 ◽  
pp. 225-237
Author(s):  
Olha BORTNYK

Problematic issues that may arise when acquiring ownership over certain categories of vacant property, both movable and immovable, are investigated and analyzed. Possible legal difficulties in practical solution of issues related to the acquisition of ownership over vacant real estate, which is located on land plots of public or private ownership, are investigated. Problematic issues related to the transfer of property rights to the land plot on which the vacant real estate is located, during the conveyance of this property to communal ownership, are analyzed. According to the results of the study, possible ways to solve these difficulties are proposed, taking into account the provisions of Art. 120 of the Land Code of Ukraine. The author substantiates the possibility of legislative consolidation of the institution of acquisition of ownership over vacant real estate by the owners of land on which such property is located. The researcher formulates possible wording of changes and additions to Art. 335 of the Civil Code of Ukraine which would introduce the institution of transfer of vacant real estate both to public, and to private property. Such changes could enable the creation of legal preconditions for conveyance of property rights to land plots to communal ownership, which under the provisions of the Land Code of Ukraine cannot be transferred to communal ownership or used by territorial communities. The issue of acquiring ownership over vacant real estate is considered bearing in mind the inadmissibility of creating legal grounds for acquisition of ownership over spontaneously constructed real estate. In addition, the possibility of acquiring ownership over various categories of vacant property is studied. According to the results of the study, the author proposes a possible procedure for acquiring ownership over property, real rights and their encumbrances which are not subject to state registration in accordance with the Law of Ukraine «On State Registration of Real Rights to Immovable Property and Their Encumbrances».


2020 ◽  
Vol Special issue (1) ◽  
pp. 153-158
Author(s):  
Behzod Axmadov ◽  
◽  
Jonibek Pirimov ◽  
Farangiz Adizova

Author(s):  
Глеб Романович Журавлев

В данном исследовании формулируются и классифицируются признаки капитальности объектов недвижимости, подлежащих государственному кадастровому учету и государственной регистрации права. In this study, we formulate and classify the capital characteristics of real estate objects that are subject to state cadastral registration and state registration of rights.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Gholipour Fereidouni ◽  
Usama Al-mulali ◽  
Miswan Abdul Hakim Bin Mohammed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document