scholarly journals Problems of the definition and characteristics of the contractual basis for the limitation and encumbrance of ownership of real estate in Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 341-348
Author(s):  
Inna Sevryukova
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Real Property ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right

Introduction. The legal description of the contractual grounds for restrictions and encumbrances on the right of ownership of real estate can be provided only after a comprehensive study of the common features of the contractual structures, which establish the relevant rights and obligations of the parties. The main common feature of such agreements is the emergence of appropriate property benefits for the owner, which is to enable the owner to satisfy their interests at the expense of someone else's real estate, resulting in restrictions and encumbrances on property subject to the contract. It should also be emphasized that each subjective right has its limits of exercise, including the subjective right of ownership, as well as other real property rights. Of course, the nature of such restrictions must be different and depend on the content and nature of the restricted right, its object and the grounds for the restrictions. That is, restrictions on property rights and other property rights cannot be the same. Restrictions on property rights are established in the interests of society and arise by law, as well as in the interests of individuals (on the basis of law, contract, court decision), and restrictions on other property rights are primarily due to protection of the property from which they originate and the legitimate interests of the owner. In our opinion, the category of real contracts should include those types of contracts relating to real estate, including contracts of encumbrance of property rights on the basis of which the rights subject to state registration arise. Purpose and objectives of the study The main common feature of such agreements is the emergence of appropriate property benefits for the owner, which is to enable the owner to satisfy their interests at the expense of someone else's real estate, resulting in restrictions and encumbrances on property subject to the contract. Therefore, we can argue for the existence of a certain generalizing type of contract, the features of which are inherent in all its subspecies, in particular, contracts for the establishment of easements, superficies, emphyteusis, mortgage agreement. Such an agreement in the legal literature is called by some authors as a real contract. However, issues concerning its legal nature, place in the system of civil law contracts remain debatable. Research methods. The research carried out in the article is based on the assessment of generally accepted approaches to defining the characteristic features of problematic issues of contractual grounds for the emergence of restrictions and encumbrances of property rights to real estate. It should be emphasized that these issues are controversial due to the lack of clear legislative regulation, which leads to imperfect legal regulation and violations of the rights of participants in property turnover. Research conclusions. As a result of the study, the idea is given that in the current legislation of Ukraine due to the lack of a clear concept of the relationship between the category of "encumbrance" and "restriction" of property rights, as well as the uncertainty of property rights, some questions remain about the classification of certain rights accordingly, about the types of material contract, this issue is debatable and needs further study. It is possible to make about polystructurality of the real contract that causes division of this type of the civil law contract into kinds and subspecies. In our opinion, such a division depends on the legal nature and scope of the relevant types of restrictions and encumbrances on the right of ownership of real estate, which are proposed by current civil law.

ON THE LEGAL NATURE OF STATE REGISTRATION OF REAL ESTATE OWNERSHIP

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihor Binko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Real Property ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
State Registration

The article examines different views on the state registration of real property rights, in particular, indicates that such a process is interpreted by scholars in terms of administrative law as: a type of administrative proceedings or as an institution of law and legislation, or as an administrative service, and in some cases as the way the state performs administrative functions. It is noted that the state registration of rights to real estate especially ownership rights, can be an institution of administrative and civil law or be considered an interdisciplinary institution. In the part in which it is an institution of administrative law, the question arises, to the substantive, ie specifically administrative law or procedural, ie administrative procedural law, this institution can be attributed? Public - legal direction, as well as the legal properties that are endowed with state registration of rights allow us to speak about a certain uniqueness of its public law essence. It plays a special role in private legal relations as a legal mechanism for the emergence, transfer and termination of rights. It is noted that while civil law uses the main dispositive method of legal regulation of civil relations, the studied relations are regulated by the method of imperative prescriptions, in particular imperative are the rules of civil law, which establish the need for state registration, as well as administrative law of procedural nature. It is stated that as part of administrative law the institute under study belongs to its special part, which contains normative material and theoretical provisions governing a particular type of homogeneous social relations, including subsectors and legal institutions, service law, municipal law, administrative law, administrative procedural law.

scholarly journals Legal nature of state registration as a legal fact in the mechanism of dynamics of property rights

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
M. Hudyma
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Legal Fact ◽  
The Right

This scientific publication attempts to clarify the legal nature of state registration as a legal fact in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights. There has been made a critical analysis of the viewpoint of supporters of the recognition of the right-establishing character of the state registration and the viewpoint of scholars who consider that the state registration has the function of confirmation, legalization of already established rights. The legislative approach to the relevant issues, which reveals the inconsistency of regulations on the place and importance of state registration in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights is analyzed. The root of all disagreements and inconsistencies is seen in the desire to take a clear position that the state registration performs only one function: either statutory or confirmatory, while the possibility of simultaneous performance of these two functions was not practically considered.It is substantiated that the legal nature of state registration is quite heterogeneous. If we talk about the property and legal significance of the act of state registration, then for the parties to the contract or other direct participants in the relative legal relationship aimed at the transfer of property rights to real estate, it will have a confirmatory value, and for third parties in absolute legal relations it will be of legal significance, providing a proof of this fact known. If we consider the state registration from the point of view of the dynamics of the process of transfer of property rights, to determine its role in this mechanism, it is the final legal fact in the legal structure, which entails the emergence of a new right holder. The publication emphasizes that giving state registration the importance of the final legal fact in the legal structure that causes the transition of property right we should not, however, shift the emphasis and consider it a priority legal fact in comparison with others. Although the registration of property rights is mandatory, it is secondary to the mechanism of transfer of ownership and other property rights to real estate, because it loses any sense and is absolutely impossible without the occurrence of other legal facts, including – the conclusion of a contract (real or consensual).

Features of Application of Article 392 of the Civil Code of Ukraine Upon Recognising the Right of Ownership of Newly Created Real Estate (A Case Study of Judicial Practice)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-90
Author(s):  
Andrii Hryniak ◽  
Nadiia Milovska
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Real Property ◽  
Real Right ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Specific Object ◽  
The Right

The study of the specific features of recognition of ownership of newly created real estate is conditioned by its purpose, which is to determine the grounds for application of remedy upon recognising ownership of newly created construction object, stipulated by Article 392 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The purpose of the study also includes identification of gaps and discrepancies in the legislation of Ukraine and judicial practice, which arise during application of the appropriate remedy for a substantive right, and the development of proposals for their elimination. In this regard, the main method of this study was comparative law, which allowed to identify and analyse different approaches to the legislative consolidation and application of such a remedy as the recognition of property rights. Upon concluding an agreement on sale and purchase of property rights to immovable property, the buyer receives a limited real right, under which it is endowed with certain, but not all rights of the property owner. Nevertheless, in recognising the ownership of newly created real estate, the study proves the feasibility of applying the method of protection stipulated in Article 392 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. It is substantiated that the buyer, who has performed its monetary obligations under the agreement on sale and purchase of real property rights, having fully paid the contractual value, is considered to have committed actions aimed at the occurrence of legal facts necessary and sufficient to obtain the legal claim for the transfer of ownership of the construction object. In this regard, it has been proved that the effectiveness of the remedy stipulated by Article 392 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which is applied upon recognising the ownership of newly created immovable property, is aimed at levelling the possibility of further unlawful actions of third parties in relation to such property, and is achieved through the enforcement of judgement by recognition of ownership of a specific object, and in case of its destruction – by obtaining appropriate compensation. The practical significance of the study of the application of Article 392 of the Civil Code of Ukraine upon recognising the ownership of newly created real estate is that its results are designed to promote further research, to improve the legal regulation of relations, the object of which is newly created real estate, to optimise the implementation of property rights and law enforcement in this area

scholarly journals To the Question of Easement Objects

2019 ◽  
pp. 81-92
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Water Bodies ◽  
Real Property ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hunting And Fishing ◽  
Property Complex

An easement under civil law is the right to use the property of others to meet the needs of others who cannot be otherwise satisfied. The legislator very briefly lists the objects of the easement and allocates positions for them in different norms. The necessity to study easement objects, among which land, their parts, other natural resources, and other real estate is justified. Issues of «other natural resources» in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine, which include water bodies, forests, flora and fauna, subsoil, are investigated. Water bodies can be transferred not only for use, but also for the property of participants of civil legal relations, and, accordingly, the owners can transfer them on the right of easement to other persons. Attention is drawn to the fact that land easements may well include an easement for the purpose of hunting and fishing. The practical necessity of using the subsoil that arises in the participants of civil legal relations, requires the regulation of this kind of easement relations at the legislative level. Ownership of an unfinished construction object is, by law, subject to state registration in the order inserted for state registration of real property rights and is immovable property, and therefore may be an object of easement. Property complexes occupy a special place in the system of civil rights objects. Although the company includes not only immovable, but also movable ones, as well as the right to trademarks and other designations, this property complex is recognized as real estate and may also be object to easement. Attention is drawn to the need of systematization of the rules regarding the objects of the easement and to amend the existing legislation accordingly.

scholarly journals Legal nature of the requirements of the banking legislation of Ukraine to ensure credit operations of banks

2021 ◽  
pp. 297-305
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Babaskin
Keyword(s):  
Credit Card ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Functional Method ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Economic Point ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Right

Іintroduction. Despite the fact that a significant number of scientific publications by well-known Ukrainian authors are devoted to the issues of legal regulation of credit obligations, at the same time separate studies of banking legislation requirements on "acceptability of collateral" have not been conducted in Ukrainian civil science in recent years. This, taking into account the gradual alignment of banking legislation of Ukraine with the standards of Basel III, and Directive 2002/47 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral mechanisms, necessitates such scientific research. The aim of the article. On the basis of the analysis of the legislation of Ukraine, the legislation of the European Union, scientific advances in the sphere of civil law and banking legislation, in the context of the analysis of the banking legislation of Ukraine, it is safe for creditors. In order to achieve this goal: 1. Conduct an analysis of civil and legal species for the protection of crops for the subject of іх possible delivery to “acceptable safety” and vrahuvannya banks when opening a credit card. 2. Significantly "quasi-security", as viewed by the banking legislation in the form of "acceptable security" for credit cards. 3. Zdіysniti analysis of the approaches to the legislation of the EU in the field of protection from credit denominations. Results. The methodological basis of the study is general scientific and special legal methods of scientific knowledge. In particular, the dialectical method, the method of analysis and synthesis, the comparative law method, the functional method, the modeling method, etc. Conclusions. First, the banking legislation does not consider as "acceptable collateral" such types of collateral as penalty, surety, deposit, retention. Secondly, the banking legislation considers as "acceptable collateral" not only those specified in Part 1 of Art. 546 of the Civil Code of Ukraine types of security for performance of obligations (pledge, right of trust ownership, guarantee), and other types of security for performance of obligations provided by law or contract (reserve letter of credit, performing the function of financial guarantee, guarantees of public entities, guarantee payment), but also contractual constructions which do not concern types of maintenance of performance of obligations (repo agreements). Thus, the banking legislation considers collateral in credit operations from the economic point of view, according to which "acceptable collateral" is only such liquid collateral that guarantees the rapid recovery of the property of the creditor bank, which suffered damage due to default or improper performance of the counterparty loan obligation, as well as "quasi-collateral", if such is referred by banking legislation to "acceptable collateral". Third, the existence of rules in the banking legislation on the acceptability of collateral in no way affects the right of banks to use any type of collateral provided by law or contract, if the application of such is possible in credit relations, taking into account the legal nature of the relevant types. software. Fourth, the set of regulations of the National Bank of Ukraine on the acceptability of collateral can be considered as an institution of banking law, which includes as rules of civil law governing the types of collateral, other rules of contract law governing other "quasi-collateral" contractual constructions, as well as public-law special norms of banking legislation, which establish additional regulatory requirements for banks to ensure credit operations and calculate credit risk.

scholarly journals Charakter prawny ograniczeń sposobu korzystania z nieruchomości w związku z ochroną zasobów środowiska – refleksje na temat art. 129 Prawa ochrony środowiska

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1 (3)) ◽  
pp. 185-198
Author(s):  
Sławomir Pawłowski
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Environmental Resources ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right Of Property

The subject of the discussion is the legal nature of restrictions on the use of real estate in relation to the protection of environmental resources. Art. 129 of Environmental Law can have the effect that the use of a property or its part is impossible or substantially reduced. In doctrine, the dominant view is that such public-law interference in the right of property assumes the form of restriction referred to in Art. 64, par. 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Another interpretation is also possible. Since the depth of the interference with property rights can lead to the effect that this property will become, as the Ombudsman has pointed out recently, “useless” to the owner, it would be reasonable to consider whether or not such property is de facto being expropriated. In such a case, the standard of constitutional control would be Art. 21, sec. 2.

scholarly journals NEGATIVE OBLIGATIONS IN CIVIL LAW: PROBLEM STATEMENT

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Detailed Analysis ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Problem Statement ◽  
Freedom Of Contract ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Contractual Relationships ◽  
The Right

The present article touches upon the issue of negative obligation interpretation in civil law. The provisions of foreign civil legislature concerning negative obligations are reviewed in detail. The article gives a detailed analysis of main issues in the scientific literature concerning the legal nature of negative obligations: impossibility of negative obligations delays, impossibility of partial performance, impossibility of negative obligation termination because of failure to perform, impossibility to enforce debt assignment . The opportunity of negative obligation counter-performance is also stressed. It is concluded that negative obligation counter-performance is considered to be possible in case such obligations are interrelated. The author comes to the conclusion that the existence of counter-negative obligations is possible that are also exposed to counter-performance provided they are interrelated. The peculiarities of such negative obligations as distribution agreements and agency contracts are pointed out. The article goes on to say about the possibility of non-concurrence agreements conclusions under civil law of Ukraine. The author states that there are some legal obstacles to it: the correlation with the principle of freedom of contract, the limitations on active civil capacity, termination employment or contractual relationships termination with creditors. Domestic trial practice is given to illustrate the indicated positions. The author draws reader`s attention to the correlation of negative obligation with such definitions as «prohibition», « right restriction» and « waiver of the right». The author justifies that negative obligations can be considered neither as right restriction nor waiver of the right. Taking into account the fact that negative obligations imposes a prohibition on a debtor to commit certain actions but such a prohibition is provided by the agreement and works in favor of creditors it is considered to be a personal prohibition. The author also draws the line between negative obligations and negative servitude that is characterized by the burden of real estate as property rights and not by establishing the commitment in respect of a person.

scholarly journals LEGAL NATURE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR STATE REGISTRATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Ю. М. Щавинська
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Family Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Administrative Duty ◽  
State Organizations ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

The relevance of the article is that the property rights of citizens and businesses are not only the basis of Ukraine's economy - they are based on family relations, they are also the material basis of local governments and state organizations, institutions and enterprises. In other words, without their proper registration and protection, it is impossible to ensure any other sphere of public life. In Ukraine, some attention is paid to the legislative definition of property rights and the problem of their state registration. And if with the first part of the outlined, in our opinion, a certain harmony is reached, then the issue of protection of property rights in today's conditions is acute. Its violations, in particular raids on enterprises and other violations of the property rights of individuals and legal entities, although decreased in number, but such facts have not remained in the past. The leading instrument of administrative legal protection of property rights is the institution of state registration of property rights, which in today's conditions is undergoing a process of further transformation and improvement in the effectiveness of protection of the rights of property rights. The artіcle reveals and descrіbes the legal nature of property rіghts and theіr state regіstratіon. Thіs іs done on the basіs of the theory of natural law, the theory of admіnіstratіve law, the theory of cіvіl law, as well as domestіc legіslatіon. Іt іs proved that the legal nature of the state regіstratіon of real rіghts to іmmovable property іs that іn іts іmplementatіon there are specіfіc admіnіstratіve and legal relatіons of a protectіve nature. It is concluded that the legal nature of state registration of property rights to property rights is that in its implementation there are classic administrative and legal protection relations, which involve applicants or their authorized persons, usually private legal entities, and public ( public) registrars as subjects of power. The content of these relations is: 1) the subjective right of the applicant to receive a kind of public protection in formal form (security document) and in essence - to use the entire public apparatus of protection and state coercion in his case in case of violation of registered property rights; 2) the administrative duty of a special subject of public administration (registrar) is a public obligation to carry out such registration. In turn, the registrar has the right to demand from the applicant provided by the current legislation confirmation of ownership of the property rights submitted for registration. Legal facts in the analyzed area of administrative and legal relations are the entry in the register of decisions on state registration, which directly lead to a change or termination of legal relations. A separate line in this area should be noted administrative-legal, administrative-procedural and economic-procedural legal relations that arise when appealing the decisions of state registrars to refuse registration (registration) of property rights to administrative or (and) judicial authorities.

Vindicatory Action in Protection of Title to Real Property of Legal Persons

10.12737/5501 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Павел Стрельников ◽  
Pavel Strelnikov
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Real Property ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Real Estate ◽  
Debt Collection ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Legal Entities

The question of the protection of property rights of legal entities in a market economy is of particular importance because it is the basis of their economic activities. Particularly acute this problem gives the specifics of the legal regime of the real estate, which has a significant impact on the choice of the means of protecting the violated rights, questioning the use of some of them. One of the methods of protection is indicated by replevin. The question of vindication as a way to protect the property rights of legal entities in the real estate is very controversial, because often put into question the very possibility of vindication property. The arguments for limiting the use of debt collection as a way to protect the rights of ownership of real estate can be divided into two groups. The first related to the essential characteristics of the real estate. The second is based on the legal regime of property, largely determined by the system of state registration of the respective object and deal with them. Based on an analysis of court decisions the author concludes that the feasibility of vindication by prohibiting the use of illegal property owner and the release of land, buildings, structures and premises in them from his property.

scholarly journals Acquisition of Ownership for Unauthorized Construction

2020 ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
Olha BORTNYK
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Free Will ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Building Codes ◽  
Land Plot ◽  
Special Construction ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Will ◽  
Under Construction ◽  
The Right

Legal relations concerning spontaneous construction are a special construction, which is not a classic example of civil relations, which are characterized by legal equality, free will, property independence of their participants, which are collectively considered the fundamental foundations of civil law. The study identifies and reveals the components of the basis for the acquisition of ownership of unauthorized construction, including: ownership can be recognized as a person for the property, which must have certain characteristics, necessary and integral features (characteristics); such property, by its legal nature, must belong to immovable property; construction must be under construction or already built; illegality (illegality) of such construction; constructed real estate or property that is under construction is located on a land plot that has not been allocated for this purpose, property is built or is being built with significant violations of applicable building codes and regulations, etc. Provisions on the understanding of each of the components of the basis for the acquisition of ownership of unauthorized construction are disclosed. Peculiarities of application of norms on unauthorized construction depending on the will of the owner of the land plot on which the unauthorized construction was carried out are stated, as well as attention is paid to the possibility of acquiring ownership of unauthorized construction by a person who did not carry out construction or the land owner. Opinions were expressed regarding the referral of the issue of acquiring the right of ownership for unauthorized construction to judicial jurisdiction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document