scholarly journals The importance of transport model uncertainties for the estimation of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks using satellite measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 14737-14769 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Houweling ◽  
I. Aben ◽  
F.-M. Breon ◽  
F. Chevallier ◽  
N. Deutscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Satellite Measurements ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Remote Sensing Technique ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Ppm Level

Abstract. This study presents a synthetic model intercomparison to investigate the importance of transport model errors for estimating the sources and sinks of CO2 using satellite measurements. The experiments were designed for testing the potential performance of the proposed CO2 lidar A-SCOPE, but also apply to other space borne missions that monitor total column CO2. The participating transport models IFS, LMDZ, TM3, and TM5 were run in forward and inverse mode using common CO2 fluxes and initial concentrations. Simulated column averaged CO2 (xCO2) mixing ratios vary between the models by σ=0.5 ppm over the continents and σ=0.27 ppm over sea. A variable, but overall quite encouraging agreement is found in comparison with FTS measurements at Park Falls, Darwin, Spitsbergen, and Bremen. Despite the fact that the models agree on average on the sub-ppm level, these modest differences nevertheless lead to significant discrepancies in the inverted fluxes of 0.1 Pg C/yr per 106 km2 over land and 0.03 Pg C/yr per 106 km2 over the ocean. These transport model induced flux uncertainties exceed the target requirement that was formulated for the A-SCOPE mission of 0.02 Pg C/yr per 106 km2, and could also limit the overall performance of other CO2 missions such as GOSAT. It is concluded that to make use of the remote sensing technique for quantifying the sources and sinks of CO2 not only requires highly accurate satellite instruments, but also puts stringent requirements on the performance of atmospheric transport models. Further development of these models should receive high priority.

scholarly journals The importance of transport model uncertainties for the estimation of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks using satellite measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 9981-9992 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Houweling ◽  
I. Aben ◽  
F.-M. Breon ◽  
F. Chevallier ◽  
N. Deutscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Tracer Transport ◽  
Satellite Measurements ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ppm Level

Abstract. This study presents a synthetic model intercomparison to investigate the importance of transport model errors for estimating the sources and sinks of CO2 using satellite measurements. The experiments were designed for testing the potential performance of the proposed CO2 lidar A-SCOPE, but also apply to other space borne missions that monitor total column CO2. The participating transport models IFS, LMDZ, TM3, and TM5 were run in forward and inverse mode using common a priori CO2 fluxes and initial concentrations. Forward simulations of column averaged CO2 (xCO2) mixing ratios vary between the models by σ=0.5 ppm over the continents and σ=0.27 ppm over the oceans. Despite the fact that the models agree on average on the sub-ppm level, these modest differences nevertheless lead to significant discrepancies in the inverted fluxes of 0.1 PgC/yr per 106 km2 over land and 0.03 PgC/yr per 106 km2 over the ocean. These transport model induced flux uncertainties exceed the target requirement that was formulated for the A-SCOPE mission of 0.02 PgC/yr per 106 km2, and could also limit the overall performance of other CO2 missions such as GOSAT. A variable, but overall encouraging agreement is found in comparison with FTS measurements at Park Falls, Darwin, Spitsbergen, and Bremen, although systematic differences are found exceeding the 0.5 ppm level. Because of this, our estimate of the impact of transport model uncerainty is likely to be conservative. It is concluded that to make use of the remote sensing technique for quantifying the sources and sinks of CO2 not only requires highly accurate satellite instruments, but also puts stringent requirements on the performance of atmospheric transport models. Improving the accuracy of these models should receive high priority, which calls for a closer collaboration between experts in atmospheric dynamics and tracer transport.

scholarly journals The constraint of CO<sub>2</sub> measurements made onboard passenger aircraft on surface-atmosphere fluxes: the impact of transport model errors in vertical mixing

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreeya Verma ◽  
Julia Marshall ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Christian Roedenbeck ◽  
Kai Uwe Totsche
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Inaccurate representation of atmospheric processes by transport models is a dominant source of uncertainty in inverse analyses and can lead to large discrepancies in the retrieved flux estimates. We investigate the impact of uncertainties in vertical transport as simulated by atmospheric transport models on fluxes retrieved using vertical profiles from aircraft as an observational constraint. Our numerical experiments are based on synthetic data with realistic spatial and temporal sampling of aircraft measurements. The impact of such uncertainties on the flux retrieved using the ground-based network with those retrieved using the aircraft profiles are compared. We find that the posterior flux retrieved using aircraft profiles is less susceptible to errors in boundary layer height as compared to the ground- based network. This highlights the benefit of utilizing atmospheric observations made onboard aircraft over surface measurements for flux estimation using inverse methods. We further use synthetic vertical profiles of CO2 in an inversion to estimate the potential of these measurements, which will be made available through the IAGOS (In-Service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project in future, in constraining the regional carbon budget. Our results show that the regions tropical Africa and temperate Eurasia, that are under constrained by the existing surface based network, will benefit the most from these measurements, the reduction of posterior flux uncertainty being about 7 to 10 %.

scholarly journals The constraint of CO<sub>2</sub> measurements made onboard passenger aircraft on surface–atmosphere fluxes: the impact of transport model errors in vertical mixing

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5665-5675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreeya Verma ◽  
Julia Marshall ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Christian Rödenbeck ◽  
Kai Uwe Totsche
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Inaccurate representation of atmospheric processes by transport models is a dominant source of uncertainty in inverse analyses and can lead to large discrepancies in the retrieved flux estimates. We investigate the impact of uncertainties in vertical transport as simulated by atmospheric transport models on fluxes retrieved using vertical profiles from aircraft as an observational constraint. Our numerical experiments are based on synthetic data with realistic spatial and temporal sampling of aircraft measurements. The impact of such uncertainties on the flux retrieved using the ground-based network and those retrieved using the aircraft profiles are compared. We find that the posterior flux retrieved using aircraft profiles is less susceptible to errors in boundary layer height, compared to the ground-based network. This finding highlights a benefit of utilizing atmospheric observations made onboard aircraft over surface measurements for flux estimation using inverse methods. We further use synthetic vertical profiles of CO2 in an inversion to estimate the potential of these measurements, which will be made available through the IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project in the future, in constraining the regional carbon budget. Our results show that the regions of tropical Africa and temperate Eurasia, that are under-constrained by the existing surface-based network, will benefit the most from these measurements, with a reduction of posterior flux uncertainty of about 7 to 10 %.

scholarly journals Characterizing uncertainties in atmospheric inversions of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in California

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2991-3006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Brophy ◽  
Heather Graven ◽  
Alistair J. Manning ◽  
Emily White ◽  
Tim Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Distribution ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Total State ◽  
Pseudo Data ◽  
Atmospheric Inversions

Abstract. Atmospheric inverse modelling has become an increasingly useful tool for evaluating emissions of greenhouse gases including methane, nitrous oxide, and synthetic gases such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Atmospheric inversions for emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion (ffCO2) are currently being developed. The aim of this paper is to investigate potential errors and uncertainties related to the spatial and temporal prior representation of emissions and modelled atmospheric transport for the inversion of ffCO2 emissions in the US state of California. We perform simulation experiments based on a network of ground-based observations of CO2 concentration and radiocarbon in CO2 (a tracer of ffCO2), combining prior (bottom-up) emission models and transport models currently used in many atmospheric studies. The potential effect of errors in the spatial and temporal distribution of prior emission estimates is investigated in experiments by using perturbed versions of the emission estimates used to create the pseudo-data. The potential effect of transport error was investigated by using three different atmospheric transport models for the prior and pseudo-data simulations. We find that the magnitude of biases in posterior total state emissions arising from errors in the spatial and temporal distribution in prior emissions in these experiments are 1 %–15 % of posterior total state emissions and are generally smaller than the 2σ uncertainty in posterior emissions. Transport error in these experiments introduces biases of −10 % to +6 % into posterior total state emissions. Our results indicate that uncertainties in posterior total state ffCO2 estimates arising from the choice of prior emissions or atmospheric transport model are on the order of 15 % or less for the ground-based network in California we consider. We highlight the need for temporal variations to be included in prior emissions and for continuing efforts to evaluate and improve the representation of atmospheric transport for regional ffCO2 inversions.

scholarly journals Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe – Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> signals

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
pp. 3461-3479 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Geels ◽  
M. Gloor ◽  
P. Ciais ◽  
P. Bousquet ◽  
P. Peylin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
High Altitude ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Inverse Methods ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Low Altitude

Abstract. The CO2 source and sink distribution across Europe can be estimated in principle through inverse methods by combining CO2 observations and atmospheric transport models. Uncertainties of such estimates are mainly due to insufficient spatiotemporal coverage of CO2 observations and biases of the models. In order to assess the biases related to the use of different models the CO2 concentration field over Europe has been simulated with five different Eulerian atmospheric transport models as part of the EU-funded AEROCARB project, which has the main goal to estimate the carbon balance of Europe. In contrast to previous comparisons, here both global coarse-resolution and regional higher-resolution models are included. Continuous CO2 observations from continental, coastal and mountain sites as well as flasks sampled on aircrafts are used to evaluate the models' ability to capture the spatiotemporal variability and distribution of lower troposphere CO2 across Europe. 14CO2 is used in addition to evaluate separately fossil fuel signal predictions. The simulated concentrations show a large range of variation, with up to ~10 ppm higher surface concentrations over Western and Central Europe in the regional models with highest (mesoscale) spatial resolution. The simulation – data comparison reveals that generally high-resolution models are more successful than coarse models in capturing the amplitude and phasing of the observed short-term variability. At high-altitude stations the magnitude of the differences between observations and models and in between models is less pronounced, but the timing of the diurnal cycle is not well captured by the models. The data comparisons show also that the timing of the observed variability on hourly to daily time scales at low-altitude stations is generally well captured by all models. However, the amplitude of the variability tends to be underestimated. While daytime values are quite well predicted, nighttime values are generally underpredicted. This is a reflection of the different mixing regimes during day and night combined with different vertical resolution between models. In line with this finding, the agreement among models is increased when sampling in the afternoon hours only and when sampling the mixed portion of the PBL, which amounts to sampling at a few hundred meters above ground. The main recommendations resulting from the study for constraining land carbon sources and sinks using high-resolution concentration data and state-of-the art transport models through inverse methods are given in the following: 1) Low altitude stations are presently preferable in inverse studies. If high altitude stations are used then the model level that represents the specific sites should be applied, 2) at low altitude sites only the afternoon values of concentrations can be represented sufficiently well by current models and therefore afternoon values are more appropriate for constraining large-scale sources and sinks in combination with transport models, 3) even when using only afternoon values it is clear that data sampled several hundred meters above ground can be represented substantially more robustly in models than surface station records, which emphasize the use of tower data in inverse studies and finally 4) traditional large scale transport models seem not sufficient to resolve fine-scale features associated with fossil fuel emissions, as well as larger-scale features like the concentration distribution above the south-western Europe. It is therefore recommended to use higher resolution models for interpretation of continental data in future studies.

scholarly journals Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models

Nature ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 415 (6872) ◽  
pp. 626-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Robert Gurney ◽  
Rachel M. Law ◽  
A. Scott Denning ◽  
Peter J. Rayner ◽  
David Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Regional Estimates

scholarly journals Characterizing Uncertainties in Atmospheric Inversions of Fossil Fuel CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions in California

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Brophy ◽  
Heather Graven ◽  
Alistair J. Manning ◽  
Emily White ◽  
Tim Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Distribution ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Pseudo Data ◽  
Atmospheric Inversions

Abstract. Atmospheric inverse modelling has become an increasingly useful tool for evaluating emissions of greenhouse gases including methane, nitrous oxide and synthetic gases such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Atmospheric inversions for emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion (ffCO2) are currently being developed. The aim of this paper is to investigate potential errors and uncertainties related to the spatial and temporal prior representation of emissions and modelled atmospheric transport for the inversion of ffCO2 emissions in the U.S. state of California. We perform simulation experiments based on a network of ground-based observations of CO2 concentration and radiocarbon in CO2 (a tracer of ffCO2), combining prior (bottom-up) emission models and transport models currently used in many atmospheric studies. The potential effect of errors in the spatial and temporal distribution of prior emission estimates is investigated in experiments by using perturbed versions of the emissions estimates used to create the pseudo data. The potential effect of transport error was investigated by using three different atmospheric transport models for the prior and pseudo data simulations. We find that the magnitude of biases in posterior state-total emissions arising from errors in the spatial and temporal distribution in prior emissions in these experiments are 1–15 % of posterior state-total emissions, and generally smaller than the 2-σ uncertainty in posterior emissions. Transport error in these experiments introduces biases of −10 % to +6 % in posterior state-total emissions. Our results indicate that uncertainties in posterior state-total ffCO2 estimates arising from the choice of prior emissions or atmospheric transport model are on the order of 15 % or less for the ground-based network in California we consider. We highlight the need for temporal variations to be included in prior emissions, and for continuing efforts to evaluate and improve the representation of atmospheric transport for regional ffCO2 inversions.

scholarly journals Improving measurements of SF<sub>6</sub> for the study of atmospheric transport and emissions

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 2441-2451 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Hall ◽  
G. S. Dutton ◽  
D. J. Mondeel ◽  
J. D. Nance ◽  
M. Rigby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Sulfur Hexafluoride ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Electron Capture Detection ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
Economic Output ◽  
World Economic ◽  
Atmospheric Tracer ◽  
Global Emissions

Abstract. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is a potent greenhouse gas and useful atmospheric tracer. Measurements of SF6 on global and regional scales are necessary to estimate emissions and to verify or examine the performance of atmospheric transport models. Typical precision for common gas chromatographic methods with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) is 1–2%. We have modified a common GC-ECD method to achieve measurement precision of 0.5% or better. Global mean SF6 measurements were used to examine changes in the growth rate of SF6 and corresponding SF6 emissions. Global emissions and mixing ratios from 2000–2008 are consistent with recently published work. More recent observations show a 10% decline in SF6 emissions in 2008–2009, which seems to coincide with a decrease in world economic output. This decline was short-lived, as the global SF6 growth rate has recently increased to near its 2007–2008 maximum value of 0.30±0.03 pmol mol−1 (ppt) yr−1 (95% C.L.).

scholarly journals Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe. Part 1: Mapping the CO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric signals

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 3709-3756 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Geels ◽  
M. Gloor ◽  
P. Ciais ◽  
P. Bousquet ◽  
P. Peylin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
High Altitude ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Concentration Data ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Low Altitude

Abstract. The CO2 source and sink distribution across Europe can be estimated in principle through inverse methods by combining CO2 observations and atmospheric transport models. Uncertainties of such estimates are mainly due to insufficient spatiotemporal coverage of CO2 observations and biases of the models. In order to assess the biases related to the use of different models the CO2 concentration field over Europe has been simulated with five different Eulerian atmospheric transport models as part of the EU-funded AEROCARB project, which has the main goal to estimate the carbon balance of Europe. In contrast to previous comparisons, here both global coarse-resolution and regional higher-resolution models are included. Continuous CO2 observations from continental, coastal and mountain in-situ atmospheric stations as well as flask samples sampled on aircrafts are used to evaluate the models' ability to capture the spatiotemporal variability and distribution of lower troposphere CO2 across Europe. 14CO2 is used in addition to evaluate separately fossil fuel signal predictions. The simulated concentrations show a large range of variation, with up to ~10 ppm higher surface concentrations over Western and Central Europe in the regional models with highest (mesoscale) spatial resolution. The simulation – data comparison reveals that generally high-resolution models are more successful than coarse models in capturing the amplitude and phasing of the observed short-term variability. At high-altitude stations the magnitude of the differences between observations and models and in between models is less pronounced, but the timing of the diurnal cycle is not well captured by the models. The data comparisons show also that the timing of the observed variability on hourly to daily time scales at low-altitude stations is generally well captured by all models. However, the amplitude of the variability tends to be underestimated. While daytime values are quite well predicted, nighttime values are generally underpredicted. This is a reflection of the different mixing regimes during day and night combined with different vertical resolution between models. In line with this finding, the agreement among models is increased when sampling in the afternoon hours only and when sampling the mixed portion of the PBL, which amounts to sampling at a few hundred meters above ground. Main recommendations resulting from the study for constraining land carbon sources and sinks using high-resolution concentration data and state-of-the art transport models are therefore: 1) low altitude stations are preferable over high altitude stations as these locations are difficult to represent in state-of-the art models, 2) at low altitude stations only afternoon values can be represented sufficiently well to be used to constrain large-scale sources and sinks in combination with transport models, 3) even when using only afternoon values it is clear that data sampled several hundred meters above ground can be represented substantially more robust in models than surface station records, and finally 4) traditional large scale transport models seem not sufficient to resolve CO2 distributions over regions of the size of for example Spain and thus seem too coarse for interpretation of continental data.

scholarly journals Impact of transport model errors on the global and regional methane emissions estimated by inverse modelling

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 10961-11021
Author(s):  
R. Locatelli ◽  
P. Bousquet ◽  
F. Chevallier ◽  
A. Fortems-Cheney ◽  
S. Szopa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Methane Emissions ◽  
Inverse Modelling ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Inverse Systems ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. A modelling experiment has been conceived to assess the impact of transport model errors on the methane emissions estimated by an atmospheric inversion system. Synthetic methane observations, given by 10 different model outputs from the international TransCom-CH4 model exercise, are combined with a prior scenario of methane emissions and sinks, and integrated into the PYVAR-LMDZ-SACS inverse system to produce 10 different methane emission estimates at the global scale for the year 2005. The same set-up has been used to produce the synthetic observations and to compute flux estimates by inverse modelling, which means that only differences in the modelling of atmospheric transport may cause differences in the estimated fluxes. In our framework, we show that transport model errors lead to a discrepancy of 27 Tg CH4 per year at the global scale, representing 5% of the total methane emissions. At continental and yearly scales, transport model errors have bigger impacts depending on the region, ranging from 36 Tg CH4 in north America to 7 Tg CH4 in Boreal Eurasian (from 23% to 48%). At the model gridbox scale, the spread of inverse estimates can even reach 150% of the prior flux. Thus, transport model errors contribute to significant uncertainties on the methane estimates by inverse modelling, especially when small spatial scales are invoked. Sensitivity tests have been carried out to estimate the impact of the measurement network and the advantage of higher resolution models. The analysis of methane estimated fluxes in these different configurations questions the consistency of transport model errors in current inverse systems. For future methane inversions, an improvement in the modelling of the atmospheric transport would make the estimations more accurate. Likewise, errors of the observation covariance matrix should be more consistently prescribed in future inversions in order to limit the impact of transport model errors on estimated methane fluxes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document