The NASA Operation IceBridge Sea Ice Freeboard, Snow Depth and Thickness Product

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Harbeck ◽  
Nathan Kurtz ◽  
Alek Petty
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Atmospheric Models ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Self Consistent ◽  
Along Track

<p>Over the eleven-year lifetime of NASA’s Operation IceBridge, the Project Science Office has released an along-track sea ice freeboard, snow depth and thickness product in varying forms. Multiple versions of archival products are available for a number of the project’s early years and more recently quicklook versions, rapid-turnaround products primarily produced for summer sea ice forecasting, have been available for Arctic campaigns. During 2020, the mission’s close-out year, we are producing a final archival version of the product that will fill gaps in data availability and incorporate multiple improvements in the processing chain. These improvements include laser altimetry and snow radar pre-processing and ingestion upgrades, improved image analysis, updated tide and atmospheric models, updated gridding methodology and enhanced product outputs. The final result will constitute a state-of-the-art, internally self-consistent data product for all springtime Arctic and Antarctic Operation IceBridge campaigns.</p>

scholarly journals On the retrieval of sea ice thickness and snow depth using concurrent laser altimetry and L-band remote sensing data

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 993-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Shiming Xu ◽  
Jiping Liu ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Microwave Remote Sensing ◽  
Ice Cover ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Passive Remote Sensing ◽  
L Band

Abstract. The accurate knowledge of sea ice parameters, including sea ice thickness and snow depth over the sea ice cover, is key to both climate studies and data assimilation in operational forecasts. Large-scale active and passive remote sensing is the basis for the estimation of these parameters. In traditional altimetry or the retrieval of snow depth with passive microwave remote sensing, although the sea ice thickness and the snow depth are closely related, the retrieval of one parameter is usually carried out under assumptions over the other. For example, climatological snow depth data or as derived from reanalyses contain large or unconstrained uncertainty, which result in large uncertainty in the derived sea ice thickness and volume. In this study, we explore the potential of combined retrieval of both sea ice thickness and snow depth using the concurrent active altimetry and passive microwave remote sensing of the sea ice cover. Specifically, laser altimetry and L-band passive remote sensing data are combined using two forward models: the L-band radiation model and the isostatic relationship based on buoyancy model. Since the laser altimetry usually features much higher spatial resolution than L-band data from the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite, there is potentially covariability between the observed snow freeboard by altimetry and the retrieval target of snow depth on the spatial scale of altimetry samples. Statistically significant correlation is discovered based on high-resolution observations from Operation IceBridge (OIB), and with a nonlinear fitting the covariability is incorporated in the retrieval algorithm. By using fitting parameters derived from large-scale surveys, the retrievability is greatly improved compared with the retrieval that assumes flat snow cover (i.e., no covariability). Verifications with OIB data show good match between the observed and the retrieved parameters, including both sea ice thickness and snow depth. With detailed analysis, we show that the error of the retrieval mainly arises from the difference between the modeled and the observed (SMOS) L-band brightness temperature (TB). The narrow swath and the limited coverage of the sea ice cover by altimetry is the potential source of error associated with the modeling of L-band TB and retrieval. The proposed retrieval methodology can be applied to the basin-scale retrieval of sea ice thickness and snow depth, using concurrent passive remote sensing and active laser altimetry based on satellites such as ICESat-2 and WCOM.

scholarly journals On the Retrieval of Sea Ice Thickness and Snow Depth using Concurrent Laser Altimetry and L-Band Remote Sensing Data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Shiming Xu ◽  
Jiping Liu ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ice Cover ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Passive Remote Sensing ◽  
L Band

Abstract. The accurate knowledge of sea ice parameters, including sea ice thickness and snow depth over the sea ice cover, are key to both climate studies and data assimilation in operational forecasts. Large-scale active and passive remote sensing is the basis for the estimation of these parameters. In traditional altimetry or the retrieval of snow depth with passive microwave sensing, although the sea ice thickness and the snow depth are closely related, the retrieval of one parameter is usually carried out under assumptions over the other. For example, climatological snow depth data or as derived from reanalyses contain large or unconstrained uncertainty, which result in large uncertainty in the derived sea ice thickness and volume. In this study, we explore the potential of combined retrieval of both sea ice thickness and snow depth using the concurrent active altimetry and passive microwave remote sensing of the sea ice cover. Specifically, laser altimetry and L-band passive remote sensing data are combined using two forward models: the L-band radiation model and the isostatic relationship based on buoyancy model. Since the laser altimetry usually features much higher spatial resolution than L-band data from Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite, there is potentially covariability between the observed snow freeboard by altimetry and the retrieval target of snow depth on the spatial scale of altimetry samples. Statistically significant correlation is discovered based on high-resolution observations from Operation IceBridge (OIB), and with a nonlinear fitting the covariability is incorporated in the retrieval algorithm. By using fitting parameters derived from large-scale surveys, the retrievability is greatly improved, as compared with the retrieval that assumes flat snow cover (i.e., no covariability). Verifications with OIB data show good match between the observed and the retrieved parameters, including both sea ice thickness and snow depth. With detailed analysis, we show that the error of the retrieval mainly arises from the difference between the modeled and the observed (SMOS) L-band brightness temperature (TB). The narrow swath and the limited coverage of the sea ice cover by altimetry, as well the uncertainty associated with the radiation model are potential sources of error. The proposed retrieval algorithm (or methodology) can be applied to the basin-scale retrieval of sea ice thickness and snow depth, using concurrent passive remote sensing and active laser altimetry based on satellites such as ICESat and ICESat-2.

scholarly journals Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office’s Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Kathleen Fiedler ◽  
Matthew Martin ◽  
Ed Blockley ◽  
Davi Mignac ◽  
Nicolas Fournier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Sampling Error ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Assimilation Model

Abstract. The feasibility of assimilating SIT (sea ice thickness) observations derived from CryoSat-2 along-track measurements of sea ice freeboard is successfully demonstrated using a 3D-Var assimilation scheme, NEMOVAR, within the Met Office’s global, coupled ocean-sea ice model, FOAM (Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model). The Arctic freeboard measurements are produced by CPOM (Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling) and are converted to SIT within FOAM using modelled snow depth. This is the first time along-track observations of SIT have been used in this way, with other centres assimilating gridded and temporally-averaged observations. The assimilation greatly improves the SIT analysis and forecast fields generated by FOAM, particularly in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic-wide observation-minus-background assimilation statistics show improvements of 0.75 m mean difference and 0.41 m RMSD (root-mean-square difference) in the freeze-up period, and 0.46 m mean difference and 0.33 m RMSD in the ice break-up period, for 2015–2017. Validation of the SIT analysis against independent springtime in situ SIT observations from NASA Operation IceBridge shows improvement in the SIT analysis of 0.61 m mean difference (0.42 m RMSD) compared to a control without SIT assimilation. Similar improvements are seen in the FOAM 5-day SIT forecast. Validation of the SIT assimilation with independent BGEP (Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project) sea ice draft observations does not show an improvement, since the assimilated CryoSat-2 observations compare similarly to the model without assimilation in this region. Comparison with Air-EM (airborne electromagnetic induction) combined measurements of SIT and snow depth shows poorer results for the assimilation compared to the control, which may be evidence of noise in the SIT analysis, sampling error, or uncertainties in the modelled snow depth, the assimilated observations, or the validation observations themselves. The SIT analysis could be improved by upgrading the observation uncertainties used in the assimilation. Despite the lack of CryoSat-2 SIT observations over the summer due to the effect of meltponds on retrievals, it is shown that the model is able to retain improvements to the SIT field throughout the summer months, due to previous SIT assimilation. This also leads to regional improvements in the July SIC (sea ice concentration) of 5 % RMSD in the European sector, due to slower melt of the thicker modelled sea ice.

scholarly journals Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-85
Author(s):  
Emma K. Fiedler ◽  
Matthew J. Martin ◽  
Ed Blockley ◽  
Davi Mignac ◽  
Nicolas Fournier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Forecast Validation ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Assimilation Model

Abstract. The feasibility of assimilating sea ice thickness (SIT) observations derived from CryoSat-2 along-track measurements of sea ice freeboard is successfully demonstrated using a 3D-Var assimilation scheme, NEMOVAR, within the Met Office's global, coupled ocean–sea-ice model, Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM). The CryoSat-2 Arctic freeboard measurements are produced by the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling (CPOM) and are converted to SIT within FOAM using modelled snow depth. This is the first time along-track observations of SIT have been used in this way, with other centres assimilating gridded and temporally averaged observations. The assimilation leads to improvements in the SIT analysis and forecast fields generated by FOAM, particularly in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic-wide observation-minus-background assimilation statistics for 2015–2017 show improvements of 0.75 m mean difference and 0.41 m root-mean-square difference (RMSD) in the freeze-up period and 0.46 m mean difference and 0.33 m RMSD in the ice break-up period. Validation of the SIT analysis against independent springtime in situ SIT observations from NASA Operation IceBridge (OIB) shows improvement in the SIT analysis of 0.61 m mean difference (0.42 m RMSD) compared to a control without SIT assimilation. Similar improvements are seen in the FOAM 5 d SIT forecast. Validation of the SIT assimilation with independent Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project (BGEP) sea ice draft observations does not show an improvement, since the assimilated CryoSat-2 observations compare similarly to the model without assimilation in this region. Comparison with airborne electromagnetic induction (Air-EM) combined measurements of SIT and snow depth shows poorer results for the assimilation compared to the control, despite covering similar locations to the OIB and BGEP datasets. This may be evidence of sampling uncertainty in the matchups with the Air-EM validation dataset, owing to the limited number of observations available over the time period of interest. This may also be evidence of noise in the SIT analysis or uncertainties in the modelled snow depth, in the assimilated SIT observations, or in the data used for validation. The SIT analysis could be improved by upgrading the observation uncertainties used in the assimilation. Despite the lack of CryoSat-2 SIT observations available for assimilation over the summer due to the detrimental effect of melt ponds on retrievals, it is shown that the model is able to retain improvements to the SIT field throughout the summer months due to prior, wintertime SIT assimilation. This also results in regional improvements to the July modelled sea ice concentration (SIC) of 5 % RMSD in the European sector, due to slower melt of the thicker sea ice.

scholarly journals On retrieving sea ice freeboard from ICESat laser altimeter

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2329-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Khvorostovsky ◽  
Pierre Rampal
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Multiyear Ice

Abstract. Sea ice freeboard derived from satellite altimetry is the basis for the estimation of sea ice thickness using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. High accuracy of altimeter measurements and freeboard retrieval procedure are, therefore, required. As of today, two approaches for estimating the freeboard using laser altimeter measurements from Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), referred to as tie points (TP) and lowest-level elevation (LLE) methods, have been developed and applied in different studies. We reproduced these methods for the ICESat observation periods (2003–2008) in order to assess and analyse the sources of differences found in the retrieved freeboard and corresponding thickness estimates of the Arctic sea ice as produced by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Three main factors are found to affect the freeboard differences when applying these methods: (a) the approach used for calculation of the local sea surface references in leads (TP or LLE methods), (b) the along-track averaging scales used for this calculation, and (c) the corrections for lead width relative to the ICESat footprint and for snow depth accumulated in refrozen leads. The LLE method with 100 km averaging scale, as used to produce the GSFC data set, and the LLE method with a shorter averaging scale of 25 km both give larger freeboard estimates comparing to those derived by applying the TP method with 25 km averaging scale as used for the JPL product. Two factors, (a) and (b), contribute to the freeboard differences in approximately equal proportions, and their combined effect is, on average, about 6–7 cm. The effect of using different methods varies spatially: the LLE method tends to give lower freeboards (by up to 15 cm) over the thick multiyear ice and higher freeboards (by up to 10 cm) over first-year ice and the thin part of multiyear ice; the higher freeboards dominate. We show that the freeboard underestimation over most of these thinner parts of sea ice can be reduced to less than 2 cm when using the improved TP method proposed in this paper. The corrections for snow depth in leads and lead width, (c), are applied only for the JPL product and increase the freeboard estimates by about 7 cm on average. Thus, different approaches to calculating sea surface references and different along-track averaging scales from one side and the freeboard corrections as applied when producing the JPL data set from the other side roughly compensate each other with respect to freeboard estimation. Therefore, one may conclude that the difference in the mean sea ice thickness between the JPL and GSFC data sets reported in previous studies should be attributed mostly to different parameters used in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion.

scholarly journals Estimation of sea ice thickness distributions through the combination of snow depth and satellite laser altimetry data

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (C10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan T. Kurtz ◽  
Thorsten Markus ◽  
Donald J. Cavalieri ◽  
Lynn C. Sparling ◽  
William B. Krabill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Altimetry Data ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness

A textural approach to snow depth distribution on Antarctic sea ice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jeffrey Mei ◽  
Ted Maksym
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Snow Surface ◽  
Altimetry Data ◽  
Laser Altimetry ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Surface Morphologies

<p>Understanding the distribution of snow depth on Antarctic sea ice is critical to estimating the sea ice thickness distribution from laser altimetry data, such as from Operation IceBridge or ICESat-2.  One major uncertainty in converting laser altimetry data to ice thickness is knowing the proportion of snow within the surface measurement. Snow redistributed by wind collects around areas of deformed ice, but it is not known how different surface morphologies affect this distribution. Here, we apply a textural segmentation algorithm to classify and group similar textures to infer the distribution of snow-ice ratios using snow surface freeboard measurements from Operation IceBridge (OIB) campaigns over the Weddell Sea. We find that texturally-similar regions have similar snow/ice ratios, but not similar snow depth measurements. This allows for the extrapolation of nadir-looking snow radar data using two-dimensional surface altimetry scans, providing a two-dimensional estimate of the snow depth. Using a convolutional neural network on an in-situ dataset, we find that local (~20 m) snow depth and sea ice thickness can be estimated with errors of < 20%, and that the learned convolutional filters imply that different surface morphologies have different proportions of snow/ice within the measured surface elevation. For the OIB data,  we show that at slightly larger scales (~180 m), snow depths can be estimated using the snow surface texture, and that the learned filters are comparable to standard textural segmentation filters. We also examine the statistical variability in the distribution of snow/ice ratios across different years to determine if snow distribution patterns on sea ice exhibit universal behaviour, or have significant interannual variations. These results suggest that surface morphological information can improve remotely-sensed estimates of snow depth, and hence sea ice thickness, compared to current methods. Such methods may be useful for reducing errors in Antarctic sea ice thickness estimates from ICESat-2.</p>

scholarly journals Retrieval of Snow Depth over Arctic Sea Ice Using a Deep Neural Network

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 2864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiping Liu ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Xiao Cheng ◽  
Yongyun Hu
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Deep Neural Network ◽  
Arctic Basin ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Arctic Sea

The accurate knowledge of spatial and temporal variations of snow depth over sea ice in the Arctic basin is important for understanding the Arctic energy budget and retrieving sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry. In this study, we develop and validate a new method for retrieving snow depth over Arctic sea ice from brightness temperatures at different frequencies measured by passive microwave radiometers. We construct an ensemble-based deep neural network and use snow depth measured by sea ice mass balance buoys to train the network. First, the accuracy of the retrieved snow depth is validated with observations. The results show the derived snow depth is in good agreement with the observations, in terms of correlation, bias, root mean square error, and probability distribution. Our ensemble-based deep neural network can be used to extend the snow depth retrieval from first-year sea ice (FYI) to multi-year sea ice (MYI), as well as during the melting period. Second, the consistency and discrepancy of snow depth in the Arctic basin between our retrieval using the ensemble-based deep neural network and two other available retrievals using the empirical regression are examined. The results suggest that our snow depth retrieval outperforms these data sets.

scholarly journals Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Survey of State-of-the-Art

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Tirivangani Magadza ◽  
Serestina Viriri
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Medical Image ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Medical Image Analysis ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Tumor Segmentation ◽  
Brain Tumor Segmentation

Quantitative analysis of the brain tumors provides valuable information for understanding the tumor characteristics and treatment planning better. The accurate segmentation of lesions requires more than one image modalities with varying contrasts. As a result, manual segmentation, which is arguably the most accurate segmentation method, would be impractical for more extensive studies. Deep learning has recently emerged as a solution for quantitative analysis due to its record-shattering performance. However, medical image analysis has its unique challenges. This paper presents a review of state-of-the-art deep learning methods for brain tumor segmentation, clearly highlighting their building blocks and various strategies. We end with a critical discussion of open challenges in medical image analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document