passive remote sensing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

278
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

25
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Kan Wu ◽  
Qimin He ◽  
Yibo He ◽  
Yuanyuan Gu ◽  
...  

For the accurate and high-precision measurement of the deformation field in mining areas using different data sources, the probability integral model was used to process deformation data obtained from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), Differential InSAR (DInSAR), and Small Baseline Subset InSAR (SBAS-InSAR) to obtain the complete deformation field. The SBAS-InSAR, DInSAR, and UAV can be used to obtain small-scale, mesoscale, and large-scale deformations, respectively. The three types of data were all superimposed by the Kriging interpolation, and the deformation field was integrated using the probability integral model to obtain the complete high-precision deformation field with complete time series in the study area. The study area was in the WangJiata mine in Western China, where mining was carried out from 12 July 2018 to 25 October 2018, on the 2S201 working face. The first observation was made in June 2018, and steady-state observations were made in April 2019, totaling four UAV observations. During this period, the Canadian Earth Observation Satellite of Radarsat-2 (R2) was used to take 10 SAR images, the surface subsidence mapping was undertaken using DInSAR and SBAS-InSAR techniques, and the complete deformation field of the working face during the 106-day mining period was obtained by using the UAV technique. The results showed that the subsidence basin gradually expanded along the mining direction as the working face advanced. When the mining advance was greater than 1.2–1.4 times the coal seam burial depth, the supercritical conditions were reached, and the maximum subsidence stabilized at the value of 2.780 m. The subsidence rate was basically maintained at 0.25 m/d. Finally, the accuracy of the method was tested by the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, and the medium error of the strike was 0.103 m. A new method is reached by the fusion of active and passive remote sensing data to construct efficient, complete and high precision time-series subsidence basins with high precision.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 4924
Author(s):  
Gaia Vaglio Laurin ◽  
Nicola Puletti ◽  
Clara Tattoni ◽  
Carlotta Ferrara ◽  
Francesco Pirotti

Windstorms are a major disturbance factor for European forests. The 2018 Vaia storm, felled large volumes of timber in Italy causing serious ecological and financial losses. Remote sensing is fundamental for primary assessment of damages and post-emergency phase. An explicit estimation of the timber loss caused by Vaia using satellite remote sensing was not yet undertaken. In this investigation, three different estimates of timber loss were compared in two study sites in the Alpine area: pre-existing local growing stock volume maps based on lidar data, a recent national-level forest volume map, and an novel estimation of AGB values based on active and passive remote sensing. The compared datasets resemble the type of information that a forest manager might potentially find or produce. The results show a significant disagreement in the different biomass estimates, related to the methods used to produce them, the study areas characteristics, and the size of the damaged areas. These sources of uncertainty highlight the difficulty of estimating timber loss, unless a unified national or regional European strategy to improve preparedness to forest hazards is defined. Considering the frequent impacts on forest resources that occurred in the last years in the European Union, remote sensing-based surveys targeting forests is urgent, particularly for the many European countries that still lack reliable forest stocks data.


Author(s):  
Yuting Zhou ◽  
K. Colton Flynn ◽  
Prasanna H. Gowda ◽  
Pradeep Wagle ◽  
Shengfang Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3875
Author(s):  
Chunyi Zhong ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Delu Pan

Phytoplankton, as the foundation of primary production, is of great significant for the marine ecosystem. The vertical distribution of phytoplankton contains key information about marine ecology and the optical properties of water bodies related to remote sensing.The common methods to detect subsurface phytoplankton biomass are often in situ measurements and passive remote sensing; however, the bio-argo measurement is discrete and costly, and the passive remote sensing measurement is limited to obtain the vertical information. As a component of active remote sensing, lidar technology has been proved as an effective method for mapping the vertical distribution of phytoplankton. In the past years, there have been few studies on the phytoplankton layer extraction method for lidar data. The existing subsurface layer extraction algorithms are often non-automatic, which need manual intervention or empirical parameters to set the layer extraction threshold. Hence, an improved adaptive subsurface phytoplankton layer detection method was proposed, which incorporates a curve fitting method and a robust estimation method to determine the depth and thickness of subsurface phytoplankton scattering layer. The combination of robust estimation method can realize automatic calculation of layer detection threshold according to the characteristic of each lidar signal, instead of an empirical fixed value used in previous works. In addition, the noise jamming signal can also be effectively detected and removed. Lidar data and in situ spatio-temporal matching Chlorophyll-a profile data obtained in Sanya Bay in 2018 was used for algorithm verification. The example result of step-by-step process illustrates that the improved method is available for adaptive threshold determination for layer detection and redundant noise signals elimination. Correlation analysis and statistical hypothesis testing shows the retrieved subsurface phytoplankton maximum depth by the improved method and in situ measurement is highly relevant. The absolute difference of layer maximum depth between lidar data and in situ data for all stations is less than 0.75 m, and mean absolute difference of layer thickness difference is about 1.74 m. At last, the improved method was also applied to the lidar data obtained near Wuzhizhou Island seawater, which proves that the method is feasiable and robust for various sea areas.


2021 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 112522
Author(s):  
Vít Kašpar ◽  
Lucia Hederová ◽  
Martin Macek ◽  
Jana Müllerová ◽  
Jiří Prošek ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ahmed El-Shirbeny ◽  
Samir Mahmoud Saleh

The importance of active and passive remote sensing data integration appears strongly on cloudy days. The lack of passive remote sensing data on cloudy days prevents the benefit of large-scale satellite data in cloudy areas, while the advantage of active remote sensing, it could penetrate the cloud and collect data underneath the cloud. The main objective of this paper is to determine the benefits of combining active and passive remote sensing data to detect actual evapotranspiration (ETa). Sentinel-1 radar data represents active data, while Landsat-8 represents passive data. Multi-date data for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-1 were used during the 2016 summer season. The characteristic soil texture in the study region is clay. The meteorological data were used to estimate ETo based on the FAO-Penman-Monteith (FPM) process, while the Lysimeter data were used to test the estimated ETa. Landsat-8 data are used to measure the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). Crop Coefficient (Kc) is calculated on the basis of NDVI. The CWSI, Kc, and ETo were then used to determine ETa. Backscattering (dB) C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data extracted from the Sentinel-1 satellite was correlated with Kc and used to estimate ETa. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) reported relevant results for active and passive satellite data separately and the combination process. For Sentinel-1, Landsat-8 and combination methods, the RMSE reported 0.89, 0.24, and 0.31 (mm/day) respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document