GPM DPR Profile Classification Algorithm: Enhancement from V6X to V7

Author(s):  
Chandrasekar V Chandra ◽  
Minda Le

<p>The profile classification module in GPM DPR level-2 algorithm outputs various products  such as rain type classification, melting layer  detection and  identification of  surface snowfall , as well as presence of graupel and hail. Extensive evaluation and validation activities have been performed on these products and have illustrated excellent performance. The latest version of these products is 6X.  With increasing interests  on severe weather  such as hail and  extreme precipitation, in  the next version (version 7), we development a flag to identify hail along the vertical profile using  precipitation type index (PTI).</p><p>Precipitation type index (PTI) plays an important role in a couple of algorithms in the profile classification module. PTI is a value calculated for each dual-frequency profile with precipitation observed by GPM DPR.   DFRm slope, the maximum value of the Zm(Ku) , and  storm top height  are used in calculating PTI. PTI is effective in separating snow and Graupel/Hail  profiles. In version 7, we zoom in further into PTI for  Graupel/ hail profiles and separate  them into graupel and hail profiles with different PTI thresholds. A new Boolean product of “flagHail” is a hail only identifier for each vertical profile.  This hail product will be validated with ground radar products and other DPR products from Trigger module of DPR level-2 algorithm.   In version 7, we make improvements of the surface snowfall algorithm. An adjustment is made accounting for global variability of storm top profiles.. A storm top normalization is introduced to obtain a smooth transition of surface snowfall identification algorithm along varying latitudes globally.</p>

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 2699-2716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minda Le ◽  
V. Chandrasekar ◽  
Sounak Biswas

AbstractThe Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on board the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory has reflectivity measurements at two different frequencies: Ku and Ka bands. The dual-frequency ratio from the measurements has been used to perform rain type classification and microphysics retrieval in the current DPR level 2 algorithm. The dual-frequency classification module is a new module in the GPM level 2 algorithm. The module performs rain type classification and melting region detection using the vertical profile of the dual-frequency ratio. This paper presents an evaluation of the performance of the GPM dual-frequency classification module after launch. The evaluation process includes a comparison between the dual-frequency classification results and the TRMM legacy single-frequency results, as well as validation with ground radars.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minda Le ◽  
V. Chandrasekar

AbstractExtensive evaluations have been performed on the dual-frequency classification module in the Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) level-2 algorithm. Both rain type classification and melting-layer detection continue to show promising results in the validations. Surface snowfall identification is a feature newly added in the classification module to the recently released version to provide a surface snowfall flag for each qualified vertical profile. This algorithm is developed upon vertical features of Ku- and Ka-band reflectivity and dual-frequency ratio from DPR. In this paper, we validate this surface snowfall identification algorithm with ground radars including NEXRAD, NASA Polarimetric Radar (NPOL), and CSU–CHILL radar during concurrent precipitation events and GPM validation campaign Olympic Mountain Experiment (OLYMPEX). Other ground truth such as Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP) and ground report is also included in the validation. Based on 16 validation cases in the years 2014–18, the average match ratio between surface snowfall flag from space radar and ground radar is around 87.8%. Promising agreements are achieved with different validation sources. Algorithm limitation and potential improvement are discussed.


Author(s):  
Chris Alexander

This paper provides details on a study performed for a liquids pipeline operator to evaluate the effects of ovality on the mechanical integrity of pipe bends in their 16-inch pipe system. Prior to this study, a caliper tool was run that indicated unacceptable ovality was present in the bends relative to the requirements set forth in ASME B31.4. An engineering investigation was performed based on the methodology of API 579 Fitness for Service. This standard provides guidance on evaluating defects using a multi-level assessment approach (Levels 1, 2, and 3) that rewards rigorous evaluation efforts by reducing the required design margins. Therefore, an extensive evaluation was performed that involved making field measurements of the bends in the ditch. Using these ovality measurements, calculations were performed using the closed-form equations in API 579 for Level 2 assessment. The ovality of several of the bends in the field was deemed unacceptable based on in-field measurements. Consequently, a Level 3 assessment was completed using finite element analysis (FEA). The results of this more rigorous analysis, coupled with more favorable design margins, resulted in this particular bend being acceptable. A tool was developed to permit a general assessment of pipe bends having ovality and was validated by performing a full-scale burst test.


2019 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 05005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mokhamad Nur Cahyadi ◽  
Almas Nandityo Rahadyan ◽  
Buldan Muslim

Ionosphere is part of the atmospheric layer located between 50 to 1000 km above the earth's surface which consists of electrons that can influence the propagation of electromagnetic waves in the form of additional time in signal propagation, this depends on Total Electron Content (TEC) in the ionosphere and frequency GPS signal. In high positioning precision with GPS, the effect of the ionosphere must be estimated so that ionospheric correction can be determined to eliminate the influence of the ionosphere on GPS observation. Determination of ionospheric correction can be done by calculating the TEC value using dual frequency GPS data from reference stations or models. In making the TEC model, a polynomial function is used for certain hours. The processing results show that the maximum TEC value occurs at noon at 2:00 p.m. WIB for February 13, 2018 with a value of 35,510 TECU and the minimum TEC value occurs in the morning at 05.00 WIB for February 7, 2018 with a value of 2,138 TECU. The TEC model spatially shows the red color in the area of Surabaya and its surroundings for the highest TEC values during the day around 13.00 WIB to 16.00 WIB.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Suzuki ◽  
Rimpei Kamamoto ◽  
Tetsuya Kawano ◽  
Katsuhiro Nakagawa ◽  
Yuki Kaneko

<p>Two products from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) algorithms, a flag of intense solid precipitation above the –10°C height (“flagHeavyIcePrecip”), and a classification of precipitation type (“typePrecip”) were validated quantitatively from the viewpoint of microphysics using ground-based in-situ hydrometeor measurements and X-band multi-parameter (X-MP) radar observations of snow clouds that occurred on 4 February 2018. The distribution of the “flagHeavyIcePrecip” footprints was in good agreement with that of the graupel-dominant pixels classified by the X-MP radar hydrometeor classification. In addition, the vertical profiles of X-MP radar reflectivity exhibited significant differences between footprints flagged and unflagged by “flagHeavyPrecip”. We confirmed the effectiveness of “flagHeavyIcePrecip”, which is built into “typePrecip” algorithm, for detecting intense ice precipitation and concluded that "flagHeavyIcePrecip" is appropriate to useful for determining convective clouds.</p><p>It is well known that the lightning activity is closely related to the convection. We examined the lightning activity using GPM DPR product flagHeavyIcePrecip that indicates the existence of graupel in the upper cloud. On 20 June 2016, we experienced heavy rain with active lightning during Baiu monsoon rainy season, while the GPM DPR passed over Kyushu region in Japan. The distribution of “flagHeavyIcePrecip” obtained from the GPM DPR well corresponded to the CG/IC lightning concentration. On 4 September 2019, isolated thunder clouds observed by the GPM DPR was also similar to the “flagHeavyIcePrecip” distribution. However, partially there was IC lightning without “flagHeavyIcePrecip”, which was positive lightning. It was suggested to have been produced in the upper clouds in which positive ice crystals were dominant.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-268
Author(s):  
Ravidho Ramadhan ◽  
. Marzuki ◽  
. Harmardi

The climatology of the vertical profile of raindrops size distribution (DSD) over Sumatra Region (10° S – 10° N, 90° E – 110° E) has been investigated using Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) level 2 data from January 2015 to June 2018. DSD's vertical profile was observed through a vertical profile of corrected radar reflectivity (Ze) and two parameters of normalized gamma DSD, i.e., mass-weight mean diameter (Dm) and total drops concentration (Nw). Land-ocean contrast and rain type dependence of DSD over Sumatra were clearly observed. The values of Dm and Nw were larger in the land than in the ocean. Negative and positive gradients of Dm toward the surface were dominant during stratiform and convective rains, respectively, consistent with the Z gradient. Moreover, the negative gradient of stratiform rain in the ocean is larger than in land. Thus, the depletion of large drops is dominant over the ocean, which is due to the break-up process that can be observed from the increase of Nw. Raindrop growth of convective rains is more robust over the ocean than land that can be seen from a larger value of Dmgradient. The BB strength is slightly larger over land and coastal region than over the ocean, indicating that the riming process is more dominant over land and coastal regions than the ocean. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01274 Full Text: PDF


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document