Copernicus POD Service - Orbit reprocessing for Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Peter ◽  
Marc Fernández ◽  
Daniel Arnold ◽  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Wim Simons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Synthetic Aperture ◽  
Phase Ambiguity ◽  
Model Update ◽  
Mission Period ◽  
Pod Quality ◽  
High Orbit ◽  
Carrier Phase Ambiguity ◽  
Gps Antenna

<p>The Copernicus Sentinel-1 SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) mission consists of two satellites A and B launched in April 2014 and April 2016, respectively. The Copernicus POD (Precise Orbit Determination) Service is responsible for the generation of precise orbital products of the mission requiring a high orbit accuracy of 5 cm in 3D RMS in the comparison to external processing facilities.</p><p>The operational POD setup at the Copernicus POD Service has passed through several updates during the last years. For instance the ITRF update from ITRF08 to ITRF14 at the end of January 2017, the fundamental background model update in May 2020, and the switch to updated GPS antenna reference point coordinates together with the introduction of carrier phase ambiguity fixing at the end of July 2020 have been done to mention just the major changes in the processing. To provide a homogeneous and up-to-date orbit time series for the two satellites a reprocessing of the full mission period is done.  </p><p>The quality control of the reprocessed Copernicus Sentinel-1 orbits is done by analysing processing metrics and by comparing the results to orbits, which were independently reprocessed by members of the Copernicus POD Quality Working Group (QWG).</p><p>Results from the full Copernicus Sentinel-1 POD reprocessing campaign are presented together with the accuracy and quality assessment of the orbits.</p>

scholarly journals Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellites: sensitivity of antenna offset estimation to orbit and observation modelling

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 87-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Peter ◽  
Jaime Fernández ◽  
Pierre Féménias
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Pressure ◽  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Complex Shape ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Synthetic Aperture ◽  
Solar Arrays ◽  
High Orbit ◽  
Gps Antenna ◽  
Single Receiver

Abstract. The SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellites require a high orbit accuracy of 5 cm in 3D in comparison to external processing facilities. The official orbit products delivered by the Copernicus POD (Precise Orbit Determination) Service fulfil this requirement. Nevertheless, analyses have shown discrepancies in the orbit results for the two satellites Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-1B. Since the satellites are identical in construction estimated orbit parameters like the scale factor for the radiation pressure are expected to be at the same magnitude, which is not the case. Estimation of GPS antenna offsets leads to differences between the two satellites, which might explain the discrepancies in the estimated orbit parameters. Such offset estimations are, however, very sensitive to orbit and observation modelling. It has to be assured that the results are not biased by insufficient models. First of all, stabilisation of the antenna offset estimation is achieved by improving the observation modelling by applying single receiver ambiguity resolution. The Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellites have a very complex shape with the long SAR antenna and the two large solar arrays. Antenna offset estimation based on different satellite models may give results which differ by up to 1.5 cm. The dispersion of the estimates is quite large depending also on eclipse and non-eclipse periods. Consideration of simple assumptions on satellite self-shadowing effects improves the satellite model and also the results of the antenna offset estimation. Finally, more consistent results for the two Sentinel-1 satellites are achieved by applying the antenna offset estimates.

scholarly journals Reduced-Dynamic Precise Orbit Determination of Haiyang-2B Altimetry Satellite Using a Refined Empirical Acceleration Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 3702
Author(s):  
Youcun Wang ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Kecai Jiang ◽  
Wenwen Li ◽  
Geer Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Integer Ambiguity ◽  
Time Variability ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Acceleration Model ◽  
Gps Antenna ◽  
Reduced Dynamic

The Haiyang 2B (HY-2B) satellite requires precise orbit determination (POD) products for geodetic remote sensing techniques. An improved set of reduced-dynamic (RD) orbit solutions was generated from the onboard Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements over a 14-month period using refined strategies and processing techniques. The key POD strategies include a refined empirical acceleration model, in-flight calibration of the GPS antenna, and the resolution of single-receiver carrier-phase ambiguities. In this study, the potential periodicity of empirical acceleration in the HY-2B POD was identified by spectral analysis. In the along-track direction, a noticeable signal with four cycles per revolution (CPR) was significant. A mixed spectrum was observed for the cross-track direction. To better understand the real in-flight environment, a refined empirical acceleration model was used to cope with the time variability of empirical accelerations in HY-2B POD. Three POD strategies were used for the reprocessing for superior orbit quality. Validation using over one year of satellite laser ranging (SLR) measurements demonstrated a 5.2% improvement in the orbit solution of the refined model. Reliable correction for the GPS antenna phase center was obtained from an over-420-day dataset, and a trend in radial offset change was observed. After application of the in-flight calibration of the GPS antenna, a 26% reduction in the RMS SLR residuals was achieved for the RD orbit solution, and the carrier phase residuals were clearly reduced. The integer ambiguity resolution of HY-2B led to strong geometric constraints for the estimated parameters, and a 15% improvement in the SLR residuals could be inferred compared with the float solution.

scholarly journals General relativistic effects acting on the orbits of Galileo satellites

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sośnica ◽  
G. Bury ◽  
R. Zajdel ◽  
K. Kazmierski ◽  
J. Ventura-Traveset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Final Height ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
De Sitter ◽  
Circular Orbits ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Artificial Earth Satellites ◽  
Artificial Earth

AbstractThe first pair of satellites belonging to the European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)—Galileo—has been accidentally launched into highly eccentric, instead of circular, orbits. The final height of these two satellites varies between 17,180 and 26,020 km, making these satellites very suitable for the verification of the effects emerging from general relativity. We employ the post-Newtonian parameterization (PPN) for describing the perturbations acting on Keplerian orbit parameters of artificial Earth satellites caused by the Schwarzschild, Lense–Thirring, and de Sitter general relativity effects. The values emerging from PPN numerical simulations are compared with the approximations based on the Gaussian perturbations for the temporal variations of the Keplerian elements of Galileo satellites in nominal, near-circular orbits, as well as in the highly elliptical orbits. We discuss what kinds of perturbations are detectable using the current accuracy of precise orbit determination of artificial Earth satellites, including the expected secular and periodic variations, as well as the constant offsets of Keplerian parameters. We found that not only secular but also periodic variations of orbit parameters caused by general relativity effects exceed the value of 1 cm within 24 h; thus, they should be fully detectable using the current GNSS precise orbit determination methods. Many of the 1-PPN effects are detectable using the Galileo satellite system, but the Lense–Thirring effect is not.

scholarly journals A Second-Order Time-Difference Position Constrained Reduced-Dynamic Technique for the Precise Orbit Determination of LEOs Using GPS

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3033
Author(s):  
Hui Wei ◽  
Jiancheng Li ◽  
Xinyu Xu ◽  
Shoujian Zhang ◽  
Kaifa Kuang
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Dynamic Models ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Time Difference ◽  
Error Sources ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Unmodeled Dynamic ◽  
Reduced Dynamic

In this paper, we propose a new reduced-dynamic (RD) method by introducing the second-order time-difference position (STP) as additional pseudo-observations (named the RD_STP method) for the precise orbit determination (POD) of low Earth orbiters (LEOs) from GPS observations. Theoretical and numerical analyses show that the accuracies of integrating the STPs of LEOs at 30 s intervals are better than 0.01 m when the forces (<10−5 ms−2) acting on the LEOs are ignored. Therefore, only using the Earth’s gravity model is good enough for the proposed RD_STP method. All unmodeled dynamic models (e.g., luni-solar gravitation, tide forces) are treated as the error sources of the STP pseudo-observation. In addition, there are no pseudo-stochastic orbit parameters to be estimated in the RD_STP method. Finally, we use the RD_STP method to process 15 days of GPS data from the GOCE mission. The results show that the accuracy of the RD_STP solution is more accurate and smoother than the kinematic solution in nearly polar and equatorial regions, and consistent with the RD solution. The 3D RMS of the differences between the RD_STP and RD solutions is 1.93 cm for 1 s sampling. This indicates that the proposed method has a performance comparable to the RD method, and could be an alternative for the POD of LEOs.

Assessment of single-difference and track-to-track ambiguity resolution in LEO precise orbit determination

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingyu Zhou ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Wenlan Fan ◽  
Xiaohui Zhou ◽  
Qusen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Single Difference

scholarly journals Comparisons of CODE and CNES/CLS GPS satellite bias products and applications in Sentinel-3 satellite precise orbit determination

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Urs Hugentobler
Keyword(s):  
Linear Combination ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Fractional Part ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Analysis Center ◽  
Wide Lane ◽  
Total Difference

AbstractTo resolve undifferenced GNSS phase ambiguities, dedicated satellite products are needed, such as satellite orbits, clock offsets and biases. The International GNSS Service CNES/CLS analysis center provides satellite (HMW) Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena bias and dedicated satellite clock products (including satellite phase bias), while the CODE analysis center provides satellite OSB (observable-specific-bias) and integer clock products. The CNES/CLS GPS satellite HMW bias products are determined by the Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena (HMW) linear combination and aggregate both code (C1W, C2W) and phase (L1W, L2W) biases. By forming the HMW linear combination of CODE OSB corrections on the same signals, we compare CODE satellite HMW biases to those from CNES/CLS. The fractional part of GPS satellite HMW biases from both analysis centers are very close to each other, with a mean Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of differences of 0.01 wide-lane cycles. A direct comparison of satellite narrow-lane biases is not easily possible since satellite narrow-lane biases are correlated with satellite orbit and clock products, as well as with integer wide-lane ambiguities. Moreover, CNES/CLS provides no satellite narrow-lane biases but incorporates them into satellite clock offsets. Therefore, we compute differences of GPS satellite orbits, clock offsets, integer wide-lane ambiguities and narrow-lane biases (only for CODE products) between CODE and CNES/CLS products. The total difference of these terms for each satellite represents the difference of the narrow-lane bias by subtracting certain integer narrow-lane cycles. We call this total difference “narrow-lane” bias difference. We find that 3% of the narrow-lane biases from these two analysis centers during the experimental time period have differences larger than 0.05 narrow-lane cycles. In fact, this is mainly caused by one Block IIA satellite since satellite clock offsets of the IIA satellite cannot be well determined during eclipsing seasons. To show the application of both types of GPS products, we apply them for Sentinel-3 satellite orbit determination. The wide-lane fixing rates using both products are more than 98%, while the narrow-lane fixing rates are more than 95%. Ambiguity-fixed Sentinel-3 satellite orbits show clear improvement over float solutions. RMS of 6-h orbit overlaps improves by about a factor of two. Also, we observe similar improvements by comparing our Sentinel-3 orbit solutions to the external combined products. Standard deviation value of Satellite Laser Ranging residuals is reduced by more than 10% for Sentinel-3A and more than 15% for Sentinel-3B satellite by fixing ambiguities to integer values.

scholarly journals A More Reliable Orbit Initialization Method for LEO Precise Orbit Determination Using GNSS

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 3646
Author(s):  
Xuewen Gong ◽  
Jizhang Sang ◽  
Fuhong Wang ◽  
Xingxing Li
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Direct Approach ◽  
Design Matrix ◽  
Reference Orbit ◽  
Stability Analyses ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Orbit Parameter

Precise orbit determination (POD) using GNSS has been rapidly developed and is the mainstream technology for the navigation of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites. The initialization of orbit parameters is a key prerequisite for LEO POD processing. For a LEO satellite equipped with a GNSS receiver, sufficient discrete kinematic positions can be obtained easily by processing space-borne GNSS data, and its orbit parameters can thus be estimated directly in iterative manner. This method of direct iterative estimation is called as the direct approach, which is generally considered highly reliable, but in practical applications it has risk of failure. Stability analyses demonstrate that the direct approach is sensitive to oversized errors in the starting velocity vector at the reference time, which may lead to large errors in design matrix because the reference orbit may be significantly distorted, and eventually cause the divergence of the orbit parameter estimation. In view of this, a more reliable method, termed the progressive approach, is presented in this paper. Instead of estimating the orbit parameters directly, it first fits the discrete kinematic positions to a reference ephemeris in the form of the GNSS broadcast ephemeris, which construct a reference orbit that is smooth and close to the true orbit. Based on the reference orbit, the starting orbit parameters are computed in sufficient accuracy, and then the final orbit parameters are estimated with a high accuracy by using discrete kinematic positions as measurements. The stability analyses show that the design matrix errors are reduced in the progressive approach, which would assure more robust orbit parameter estimation than the direct estimation approach. Various orbit initialization experiments are performed on the KOMPSAT-5 and FY3C satellites. The results have fully verified the high reliability of the proposed progressive approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document