scholarly journals Comparisons of CODE and CNES/CLS GPS satellite bias products and applications in Sentinel-3 satellite precise orbit determination

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Urs Hugentobler
Keyword(s):  
Linear Combination ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Fractional Part ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Analysis Center ◽  
Wide Lane ◽  
Total Difference

AbstractTo resolve undifferenced GNSS phase ambiguities, dedicated satellite products are needed, such as satellite orbits, clock offsets and biases. The International GNSS Service CNES/CLS analysis center provides satellite (HMW) Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena bias and dedicated satellite clock products (including satellite phase bias), while the CODE analysis center provides satellite OSB (observable-specific-bias) and integer clock products. The CNES/CLS GPS satellite HMW bias products are determined by the Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena (HMW) linear combination and aggregate both code (C1W, C2W) and phase (L1W, L2W) biases. By forming the HMW linear combination of CODE OSB corrections on the same signals, we compare CODE satellite HMW biases to those from CNES/CLS. The fractional part of GPS satellite HMW biases from both analysis centers are very close to each other, with a mean Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of differences of 0.01 wide-lane cycles. A direct comparison of satellite narrow-lane biases is not easily possible since satellite narrow-lane biases are correlated with satellite orbit and clock products, as well as with integer wide-lane ambiguities. Moreover, CNES/CLS provides no satellite narrow-lane biases but incorporates them into satellite clock offsets. Therefore, we compute differences of GPS satellite orbits, clock offsets, integer wide-lane ambiguities and narrow-lane biases (only for CODE products) between CODE and CNES/CLS products. The total difference of these terms for each satellite represents the difference of the narrow-lane bias by subtracting certain integer narrow-lane cycles. We call this total difference “narrow-lane” bias difference. We find that 3% of the narrow-lane biases from these two analysis centers during the experimental time period have differences larger than 0.05 narrow-lane cycles. In fact, this is mainly caused by one Block IIA satellite since satellite clock offsets of the IIA satellite cannot be well determined during eclipsing seasons. To show the application of both types of GPS products, we apply them for Sentinel-3 satellite orbit determination. The wide-lane fixing rates using both products are more than 98%, while the narrow-lane fixing rates are more than 95%. Ambiguity-fixed Sentinel-3 satellite orbits show clear improvement over float solutions. RMS of 6-h orbit overlaps improves by about a factor of two. Also, we observe similar improvements by comparing our Sentinel-3 orbit solutions to the external combined products. Standard deviation value of Satellite Laser Ranging residuals is reduced by more than 10% for Sentinel-3A and more than 15% for Sentinel-3B satellite by fixing ambiguities to integer values.

scholarly journals Validation of the EGSIEM-REPRO GNSS Orbits and Satellite Clock Corrections

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 2322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreja Sušnik ◽  
Andrea Grahsl ◽  
Daniel Arnold ◽  
Arturo Villiger ◽  
Rolf Dach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Gps Satellites ◽  
Glonass Satellite ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gravity Recovery ◽  
First Time

In the framework of the European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM) project, consistent sets of state-of-the-art reprocessed Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) orbits and satellite clock corrections have been generated. The reprocessing campaign includes data starting in 1994 and follows the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) processing strategy, in particular exploiting the extended version of the empirical CODE Orbit Model (ECOM). Satellite orbits are provided for Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites since 1994 and for Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema (GLONASS) since 2002. In addition, a consistent set of GPS satellite clock corrections with 30 s sampling has been generated from 2000 and with 5 s sampling from 2003 onwards. For the first time in a reprocessing scheme, GLONASS satellite clock corrections with 30 s sampling from 2008 and 5 s from 2010 onwards were also generated. The benefit with respect to earlier reprocessing series is demonstrated in terms of polar motion coordinates. GNSS satellite clock corrections are validated in terms of completeness, Allan deviation, and precise point positioning (PPP) using terrestrial stations. In addition, the products herein were validated with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) precise orbit determination (POD) and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR). The dataset is publicly available.

scholarly journals LEO-Constellation-Augmented BDS Precise Orbit Determination Considering Spaceborne Observational Errors

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3189
Author(s):  
Min Li ◽  
Tianhe Xu ◽  
Haibo Ge ◽  
Meiqian Guan ◽  
Honglei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Leo Satellites ◽  
Solar Storm ◽  
Observational Errors

The precise orbit determination (POD) accuracy of the Chinese BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) is still not comparable to that of the Global Positioning System because of the unfavorable geometry of the BDS and the uneven distribution of BDS ground monitoring stations. Fortunately, low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, serving as fast moving stations, can efficiently improve BDS geometry. Nearly all studies on Global Navigation Satellite System POD enhancement using large LEO constellations are based on simulations and their results are usually overly optimistic. The receivers mounted on a spacecraft or an LEO satellite are usually different from geodetic receivers and the observation conditions in space are more challenging than those on the ground. The noise level of spaceborne observations needs to be carefully calibrated. Moreover, spaceborne observational errors caused by space weather events, i.e., solar geomagnetic storms, are usually ignored. Accordingly, in this study, the actual spaceborne observation noises are first analyzed and then used in subsequent observation simulations. Then, the observation residuals from the actual-processed LEO POD during a solar storm on 8 September 2017 are extracted and added to the simulated spaceborne observations. The effect of the observational errors on the BDS POD augmented with different LEO constellation configurations is analyzed. The results indicate that the noise levels from the Swarm-A, GRACE-A, and Sentinel-3A satellites are different and that the carrier-phase measurement noise ranges from 2 mm to 6 mm. Such different noise levels for LEO spaceborne observations cause considerable differences in the BDS POD solutions. Experiments calculating the augmented BDS POD for different LEO constellations considering spaceborne observational errors extracted from the solar storm indicate that these errors have a significant influence on the accuracy of the BDS POD. The 3D root mean squares of the BDS GEO, IGSO, and MEO satellite orbits are 1.30 m, 1.16 m, and 1.02 m, respectively, with a Walker 2/1/0 LEO constellation, and increase to 1.57 m, 1.72 m, and 1.32 m, respectively, with a Walker 12/3/1 constellation. When the number of LEO satellites increases to 60, the precision of the BDS POD improves significantly to 0.89 m, 0.77 m, and 0.69 m for the GEO, IGSO, and MEO satellites, respectively. While 12 satellites are sufficient to enhance the BDS POD to the sub-decimeter level, up to 60 satellites can effectively reduce the influence of large spaceborne observational errors, i.e., from solar storms.

Simulation of Orbit Determination of HaiYang-2 Satellite on DORIS

2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 3456-3459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Li Kong ◽  
Jin Yun Guo ◽  
Li Tao Han
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
The World ◽  
Space Geodetic Techniques ◽  
Orbit Tracking ◽  
The Relationship

DORIS is a kind of advanced space-geodetic techniques applied in satellite orbit tracking and measuring. As the first ocean dynamic environmental satellite in China, the HY-2 satellite is equipped with the Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite (DORIS) tracking system for the precise orbit determination. In particular, the investigation of our work has focused on accuracy analysis of orbit determination using simulated DORIS data given different observation noises, besides the relationship is investigated between accuracy and computation time and the number of ground beacons evenly distributed around the world. Experiment results show that observation noises can affect the accuracy of orbit determination directly, and the number of DORIS ground beacons decides the accuracy and computation time of obit determination in the condition of ground beacons are evenly distributed around the world, therefore, during the process of obit determination, we should optimize the ground beacon station distribution to achieve the best accuracy of obit determination using DORIS tracking data.

scholarly journals Research on Attitude Models and Antenna Phase Center Correction for Jason-3 Satellite Orbit Determination

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2408
Author(s):  
Mingming Liu ◽  
Yunbin Yuan ◽  
Jikun Ou ◽  
Yanju Chai
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Event File ◽  
Phase Center ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Antenna Phase ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Phase Center Variation ◽  
Antenna Phase Center

We focused on the researches of two models used for Jason-3 precise orbit determination (POD)—Jason-3 attitude modes and receiver phase center variation (PCV) model. A combined attitude mode for the Jason-3 satellite is designed based on experimental analysis used in some special cases, such as in the absence of quaternions or when inconvenient to use. We researched the linking of satellite attitude with antenna phase center. Specially, to verify the validity of the combined attitude, we analyzed the effects of different attitude modes on receiver phase center offset (PCO) estimation, PCO correction and POD. Meanwhile, the difference analysis of PCO correction based on attitude modes also contains the combined attitude modeling processes. The POD results showed that the orbital accuracies with the combined attitude are slightly more stable than those with attitude event file. By introducing receiver PCVs into POD, the mean residuals root-mean-square (RMS) is reduced by 1.9 mm and orbital 3D-RMS position difference is improved by 5.7 mm. The eight schemes were designed to integratedly verify the effectiveness of different attitude modes and receiver PCVs model. The results conclude that the accuracy using the combined attitude is higher than that of event file, which also prove the feasibility of the combined attitude in integrated POD and it can be as a revision of attitude event file. Using all mentioned attitude modes, the orbital accuracy by introducing PCVs can be improved by the millimeter level. The integrated effects of attitude modes and receiver PCVs on POD are almost consistent with the effects of a single variable. The optimal results of Jason-3 POD indicate that orbital mean radial RMS is close to 1 cm, and the 3D-RMS position difference is within 3 cm.

scholarly journals Effects of New Level-1B Data on GRACE Temporal Gravity Field Models and Precise Orbit Determination Solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 4119
Author(s):  
Nannan Guo ◽  
Xuhua Zhou ◽  
Kai Li
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Field Model ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Temporal Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Models

The quality of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation is the prerequisite for obtaining the high-precision GRACE temporal gravity field model. To study the influence of new-generation GRACE Level-1B Release 03 (RL03) data and the new atmosphere and ocean de-aliasing (AOD1B) products on recovering temporal gravity field models and precise orbit determination (POD) solutions, we combined the global positioning system and K-band ranging-rate (KBRR) observations of GRACE satellites to estimate the effect of different data types on these solutions. The POD and monthly gravity field solutions are obtained from 2005 to 2010 by SHORDE software developed by the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory. The post-fit residuals of the KBRR data were decreased by approximately 10%, the precision of three-direction positions of the GRACE POD was improved by approximately 5%, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the monthly gravity field model was enhanced. The improvements in the new release of monthly gravity field model and POD solutions can be attributed to the enhanced Level-1B KBRR data and the AOD1B model. These improvements were primarily due to the enhanced of KBRR data; the effect of the AOD1B model was not significant. The results also showed that KBRR data slightly improve the satellite orbit precision, and obviously enhance the precision of the gravity field model.

scholarly journals Investigating the GALILEO and BeiDou orbit accuracy derived from rapid products

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 316-321
Author(s):  
Sermet Ogutcu ◽  
Salih Alcay ◽  
Omer Faruk Atiz
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Solar Radiation Pressure ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Yaw Attitude ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Cross Track ◽  
Mean Square Errors

In recent years, the advances of the new Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) constellations including, Galileo and BeiDou (BDS), have undergone dramatic changes. Some analysis centers (ACs) produce precise orbit and clock products of Galileo and BeiDou constellations. Currently, three types of Galileo and BeiDou satellite orbit and clock products are available – namely, precise, rapid and ultra-rapid products –. Ultra-rapid and rapid products are generally used for time-constrained applications. Precise orbit determination (POD) of Galileo and BeiDou is much challenging compared with GPS and GLONASS constellations due to the officially undetermined receiver phase center offset (PCO), variations (PCV) of Galileo and BeiDou constellations and, also some other not well-defined factors such as yaw-attitude models and solar radiation pressure. In this study, GALILEO orbit accuracy is investigated using rapid products produced by Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WUHAN), while GFZ and WUHAN rapid products are used for BeiDou constellation only. One month (January) of data in 2020 is used to compute errors of radial, along-track, and cross-track components of Galileo and BeiDou orbit derived by rapid products compared with the CODE final Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) product which is assumed as the reference product. The results show that no significant differences between the products are found for Galileo orbit. For BeiDou orbit, WUHAN rapid product produced the smaller root mean square errors (RMSEs) of orbit components compared with the GFZ rapid product.

Potential of VLBI observations to satellites for precise orbit determination

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicat Mammadaliyev ◽  
Patrick Schreiner ◽  
Susanne Glaser ◽  
Karl Hans Neumayer ◽  
Rolf Koenig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Error Sources ◽  
Interferometric Technique ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Vlbi Observations ◽  
Low Earth Orbits ◽  
Earth Orbits

<p>Besides the natural extra-galactic radio sources, observing an artificial Earth-orbiting radio source with the Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) permits to extend the geodetic and geodynamic applications of this highly accurate interferometric technique. Furthermore, combining aforementioned observations provides a promising method to determine the satellite orbit and delivers the new type of observations such as group delay and delay rate which might be employed to validate the orbit independent of other space geodetic techniques.</p><p>In this research, the potential of the interferometric satellite tracking for the Precise Orbit Determination (POD) has been explored based on simulated observations for different scenarios with various VLBI networks, satellite orbits (eccentric low Earth orbits or circular medium Earth orbits) and error sources. POD of the Earth-orbiting satellites is studied on the basis of daily VLBI sessions where satellite observations are scheduled together with the quasar observation for regionally or globally distributed legacy as well as next generation VLBI station networks. In order to simulate VLBI to satellite observations, the influence of the most prominent random error sources in VLBI as well as mismodelling of different force models acting on the satellite are utilized. This study indicates that POD is feasible with VLBI observations and the accuracy mainly depends on the observation geometry.</p>

scholarly journals A Three-Step Method for Determining Unhealthy Time Period of GPS Satellite Orbit in Broadcast Ephemeris and Its Preliminary Applications for Precise Orbit Determination

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Ye ◽  
Yunbin Yuan ◽  
Baocheng Zhang ◽  
Bingfeng Tan ◽  
Jikun Ou
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Traditional Method ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Broadcast Ephemeris ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Time Periods

Abnormal information of satellite orbits inevitably appears in the broadcast ephemeris. Failure to obtain unhealthy information on GPS satellite orbits in precise orbit determination (POD) degrades GPS service performance. At present, the reliable unhealthy information published by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) is usually used, but it has at least one-day latency, and the current level of unhealthy information cannot fully meet the requirements of rapid and real-time geodetic applications, especially for non-IGS (International global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) Service) analysis centers and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) users. Furthermore, the unhealthy orbit information detected by the traditional method, which is based on the synchronized pseudo-range residuals and regional observation network, cannot meet the requirement of setting separate sub-arcs in POD. In view of these problems, we propose a three-step method for determining unhealthy time periods of GPS satellite orbit in broadcast ephemeris during POD to provide reliable unhealthy information in near-real time. This method is a single-epoch solution, and it can detect unhealthy time periods in each sampling of observation in theory. It was subsequently used to detect unhealthy time periods for satellites G09 and G01 based on the 111 globally distributed tracking stations in the IGS. The performance of the new method was evaluated using cross-validation. Based on the test results, it detected an orbital leap for G09 in the broadcast ephemeris from 09:59:42 to 14:00:42 on 25 August 2017. Compared to the traditional method, the unhealthy start time using the three-step method was in better agreement with the information provided by CODE’s satellite crux files. G01 did not appear to have an orbital leap on the specified date, but it was misjudged by the traditional method. Furthermore, compared to the traditional method, the three-step method can perform unhealthy time period detection for a satellite all day long. In addition, precise orbit determination for unhealthy satellites is realized successfully with the unhealthy orbit arc information identified in this study. Compared to the CODE orbit, the root mean square and standard deviation of the new method for G09 are less than 2 cm, and the three-step method shows an improvement in accuracy compared with the traditional method. From the above results, it can be seen that this study can provide a feasible approach to meet the real-time unhealthy time period detection requirements of a satellite orbit in a broadcast ephemeris during POD. Furthermore, compared to waiting for updates of CODE’s satellite crux files or for accumulating delayed observation data, it has the potential to provide additional information in the process of generating ultra-rapid/real-time orbits.

A discussion on orbital analysis - A brief survey of satellite orbit determination

1967 ◽  
Vol 262 (1124) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Accurate Determination ◽  
Solar Radiation Pressure ◽  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Dynamical Theory ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Perturbation Techniques ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Orbital Analysis

The accurate determination of satellite orbits depends on an adequate accumulation of observations, a sound dynamical theory and a fairly sophisticated sequence of numerical computations. The particular patterns of observation, theory and computation are considered in relation to the objectives of orbit determination. Factors to be taken into account are the type, accuracy and spread of observations; perturbations of the orbit due to air drag, attraction of the Earth, Moon, and Sun, and solar radiation pressure; and the speed and cost of available computers. These factors, together with the overall objectives, determine the main features of the computation; whether to use special or general perturbation techniques, what length of orbit arc to use, what parameters to determine and how to present the results.

Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan-nan Guo ◽  
Xu-hua Zhou ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
Bin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Sampling Interval ◽  
Satellite Clock ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Clock Error ◽  
Leo Satellites ◽  
Satellite Clock Error

Abstract With the successful use of GPS-only-based POD (precise orbit determination), more and more satellites carry onboard GPS receivers to support their orbit accuracy requirements. It provides continuous GPS observations in high precision, and becomes an indispensable way to obtain the orbit of LEO satellites. Precise orbit determination of LEO satellites plays an important role for the application of LEO satellites. Numerous factors should be considered in the POD processing. In this paper, several factors that impact precise orbit determination are analyzed, namely the satellite altitude, the time-variable earth’s gravity field, the GPS satellite clock error and accelerometer observation. The GRACE satellites provide ideal platform to study the performance of factors for precise orbit determination using zero-difference GPS data. These factors are quantitatively analyzed on affecting the accuracy of dynamic orbit using GRACE observations from 2005 to 2011 by SHORDE software. The study indicates that: (1) with the altitude of the GRACE satellite is lowered from 480 km to 460 km in seven years, the 3D (three-dimension) position accuracy of GRACE satellite orbit is about 3∼4 cm based on long spans data; (2) the accelerometer data improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 1 cm; (3) the accuracy of zero-difference dynamic orbit is about 6 cm with the GPS satellite clock error products in 5 min sampling interval and can be raised to 4 cm, if the GPS satellite clock error products with 30 s sampling interval can be adopted. (4) the time-variable part of earth gravity field model improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 0.5∼1.5 cm. Based on this study, we quantitatively analyze the factors that affect precise orbit determination of LEO satellites. This study plays an important role to improve the accuracy of LEO satellites orbit determination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document